It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 7:32 am

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 7 of 7
  [ 189 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
good dolphin
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
No QB in 16!

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.
Top
 Profile  
 
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48801
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Dignified Rube wrote:
Are we supposed to believe Hub or Pace that said not too long ago that they will take the best available at 11, even if that's a QB?


The best available player at 11 won't be a QB. That doesn't mean I still wouldn't take one.

There's a couple ways they could go that I'd be OK with. I'd like a LT or QB.

I don't want Elliott. I think he'll be an OK back. But his marginal utility over somebody like Henry or others that you could get in the 2nd or 3rd or 4th, even, is much lower than somebody like Lynch, where the dropoff behind him is precipitous to Cook or Hackenberg.

_________________
You know me like that.
Top
 Profile  
 
312player
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 4:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Dignified Rube wrote:
Are we supposed to believe Hub or Pace that said not too long ago that they will take the best available at 11, even if that's a QB?


The best available player at 11 won't be a QB. That doesn't mean I still wouldn't take one.

There's a couple ways they could go that I'd be OK with. I'd like a LT or QB.

I don't want Elliott. I think he'll be an OK back. But his marginal utility over somebody like Henry or others that you could get in the 2nd or 3rd or 4th, even, is much lower than somebody like Lynch, where the dropoff behind him is precipitous to Cook or Hackenberg.






Listening to Waddle-Silverman... The bears have worked out 10 qbs this draft, second only to the cowgirls @ 11...sounds like they are definitely grabbing a qb ...I'm hoping its Cardale Jones.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.
Top
 Profile  
 
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 7:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10108
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
I keep on thinking that if Lynch is at 11, the Bears will trade Cutler to the Jets and take Lynch.

I still don't know if I like that or not. I don't think the Bears' can win a Super Bowl on Cutler's current contract, but I don't know anything about Lynch because I don't watch college football.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal
Top
 Profile  
 
Peoria Matt
PostPosted: Wed Apr 27, 2016 7:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
I keep on thinking that if Lynch is at 11, the Bears will trade Cutler to the Jets and take Lynch.

I still don't know if I like that or not. I don't think the Bears' can win a Super Bowl on Cutler's current contract, but I don't know anything about Lynch because I don't watch college football.


That would be something. Really looking forward to watching this.
Top
 Profile  
 
good dolphin
PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2016 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
good dolphin wrote:
I would be OK if they took Lynch. The guy has a lot of desirable skills and they have the ability to wait for him.

I am very high on Elliott. It's just a different era for RB in the NFL.'

A trade back would get me to the guy I'd really like to see on the Bears, Jackson III or possibly Spence

This draft is kind of like last year, where I don't think I could be disappointed with the pick. Conklin or Stanley are fine by me. Lynch or Elliott are good. Lawson, Buckner, Jack, etc. same.

I don't want Floyd.

A really great draft would be an offensive player followed by Chris Jones or Ogbah, if he falls.

I and the Bears are locked in on Jones in the second.


:cry:

The draft really was set to fall the way I wanted. Tunsil would have been there at 11. Then they would have had the ammo to move up for Jones in Rd 2. All reports are that he was a guy they wanted and traded out of the pick when he was gone.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.
Top
 Profile  
 
good dolphin
PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2016 4:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82222
Overall, I think this was a nice draft. I think they got a starting quality players at OG, DE, and RB. I think they got some really interesting guys in the secondary who are special teams stars (Carson blocked 7 kicks last year).

I will set my sites low on Floyd. Be Mark Anderson as he was in year 1 and I will be pleased as punch. I don't even care if he gets better from there. Rush the passer as well as Anderson and that is worthy of a top 10 pick.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.
Top
 Profile  
 
RFDC
PostPosted: Mon May 02, 2016 10:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
good dolphin wrote:
Overall, I think this was a nice draft. I think they got a starting quality players at OG, DE, and RB.

I agree. I think the ILB they got of WV could be starting quality down the road as well.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."

Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.
Top
 Profile  
 
Tall Midget
PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2016 10:28 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
RFDC wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Overall, I think this was a nice draft. I think they got a starting quality players at OG, DE, and RB.

I agree. I think the ILB they got of WV could be starting quality down the road as well.


This will prove to be the best Bears draft since 2000 or 2003. possibly since the early 80s.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 7 of 7
  [ 189 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group