It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 4:16 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2019 7:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
...or maybe not

https://www.dailyherald.com/sports/2019 ... last-years

Quote:
Interestingly, though, the facts suggest there are more similarities between this year and last than differences.

The Bears got to 3-1 a year ago by doing more to lose the opener to the Packers than what Green Bay did to beat them, and then putting together lackluster wins over Seattle and Arizona before exploding in what was the most dominant win of the season over the Bucs.

This year has been almost a carbon copy, with a similar loss to the Packers, ugly wins at Denver and Washington and then one of their best performances in years thrashing the Vikings.

Last season, the bye came in Week 4 and they came out of it with their worst performance of the year, losing at Miami with the defense giving up 31 points and 541 yards of offense to a bad Dolphins team.

A week later, just like the visit from the Saints Sunday, the NFL's best team (New England) came in and hung 38 points and another 381 yards on the defense.

I have no idea what's next, but last year's 3-3 and this year's are eerily similar.


Hub's not wrong

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:14 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Record wise, ok it's similar. But there are a lot of differences and you cannot call this a carbon copy. First, the offense was actually able to move the ball. Hub fails to mention that the Bears scored 31 points against the Pats, and were a yard short of tying the game after Kevin White caught a Hail Mary at the 1. The Bears defense has their worst 2nd half against Miami, but they still put up 28 points in regulation and were a Parkey FG away from winning that one.

The Bears looked like they had an offense last year. Outside of one quarter against the hapless Redskins, they haven't looked like an NFL offense all year. Also, the Bears were a lot healthier and the Packers were not running away with the division last year. In week 7 last year, the Packers 3-2-1 and the Vikings were 4-2-1. The Bears were 3-3 and two of those were AFC losses so they did not have to chase 2 and 3 games like they are going to have to do this year.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2019 9:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 14922
pizza_Place: Grazianos
sjboyd0137 wrote:
...or maybe not

https://www.dailyherald.com/sports/2019 ... last-years

Quote:
Interestingly, though, the facts suggest there are more similarities between this year and last than differences.

The Bears got to 3-1 a year ago by doing more to lose the opener to the Packers than what Green Bay did to beat them, and then putting together lackluster wins over Seattle and Arizona before exploding in what was the most dominant win of the season over the Bucs.

This year has been almost a carbon copy, with a similar loss to the Packers, ugly wins at Denver and Washington and then one of their best performances in years thrashing the Vikings.

Last season, the bye came in Week 4 and they came out of it with their worst performance of the year, losing at Miami with the defense giving up 31 points and 541 yards of offense to a bad Dolphins team.

A week later, just like the visit from the Saints Sunday, the NFL's best team (New England) came in and hung 38 points and another 381 yards on the defense.

I have no idea what's next, but last year's 3-3 and this year's are eerily similar.


Hub's not wrong


He isn't wrong. There is just a different feel about it, though, because last season there really wasn't a lot of hope going into the season like there was this year. I still cannot figure out really who to blame the 3-3 record on but I keep coming back to how terrible the offensive line is. But then again, a good offensive coordinator can scheme around a bad offensive line.

What I do know, though, is that it is up to NAGY to get the offense going because there is talent on the offense and good coaches need to get the ball in the hands of guys to have them make plays. This is Nagy's coaching test and he needs to step up and prove himself.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2019 9:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
The Hawk wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
...or maybe not

https://www.dailyherald.com/sports/2019 ... last-years

Quote:
Interestingly, though, the facts suggest there are more similarities between this year and last than differences.

The Bears got to 3-1 a year ago by doing more to lose the opener to the Packers than what Green Bay did to beat them, and then putting together lackluster wins over Seattle and Arizona before exploding in what was the most dominant win of the season over the Bucs.

This year has been almost a carbon copy, with a similar loss to the Packers, ugly wins at Denver and Washington and then one of their best performances in years thrashing the Vikings.

Last season, the bye came in Week 4 and they came out of it with their worst performance of the year, losing at Miami with the defense giving up 31 points and 541 yards of offense to a bad Dolphins team.

A week later, just like the visit from the Saints Sunday, the NFL's best team (New England) came in and hung 38 points and another 381 yards on the defense.

I have no idea what's next, but last year's 3-3 and this year's are eerily similar.


Hub's not wrong


He isn't wrong. There is just a different feel about it, though, because last season there really wasn't a lot of hope going into the season like there was this year. I still cannot figure out really who to blame the 3-3 record on but I keep coming back to how terrible the offensive line is. But then again, a good offensive coordinator can scheme around a bad offensive line.

What I do know, though, is that it is up to NAGY to get the offense going because there is talent on the offense and good coaches need to get the ball in the hands of guys to have them make plays. This is Nagy's coaching test and he needs to step up and prove himself.


I completely agree that it feels different. At this point, I'm trying to find a bright spot to look at because I'd rather spend the next 2 months watching this team and trying to be optimistic.

As far as the OC goes, I get the feeling that Nagy doesn't let Helfrich do much of anything, and maybe that's something that needs to change.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2019 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
sjboyd0137 wrote:
...or maybe not

https://www.dailyherald.com/sports/2019 ... last-years

Quote:
Interestingly, though, the facts suggest there are more similarities between this year and last than differences.

The Bears got to 3-1 a year ago by doing more to lose the opener to the Packers than what Green Bay did to beat them, and then putting together lackluster wins over Seattle and Arizona before exploding in what was the most dominant win of the season over the Bucs.

This year has been almost a carbon copy, with a similar loss to the Packers, ugly wins at Denver and Washington and then one of their best performances in years thrashing the Vikings.

Last season, the bye came in Week 4 and they came out of it with their worst performance of the year, losing at Miami with the defense giving up 31 points and 541 yards of offense to a bad Dolphins team.

A week later, just like the visit from the Saints Sunday, the NFL's best team (New England) came in and hung 38 points and another 381 yards on the defense.

I have no idea what's next, but last year's 3-3 and this year's are eerily similar.


Hub's not wrong

Calling the Vikings game one of their best performances in years is a pretty huge stretch.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2019 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38635
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
FavreFan wrote:
sjboyd0137 wrote:
...or maybe not

https://www.dailyherald.com/sports/2019 ... last-years

Quote:
Interestingly, though, the facts suggest there are more similarities between this year and last than differences.

The Bears got to 3-1 a year ago by doing more to lose the opener to the Packers than what Green Bay did to beat them, and then putting together lackluster wins over Seattle and Arizona before exploding in what was the most dominant win of the season over the Bucs.

This year has been almost a carbon copy, with a similar loss to the Packers, ugly wins at Denver and Washington and then one of their best performances in years thrashing the Vikings.

Last season, the bye came in Week 4 and they came out of it with their worst performance of the year, losing at Miami with the defense giving up 31 points and 541 yards of offense to a bad Dolphins team.

A week later, just like the visit from the Saints Sunday, the NFL's best team (New England) came in and hung 38 points and another 381 yards on the defense.

I have no idea what's next, but last year's 3-3 and this year's are eerily similar.


Hub's not wrong

Calling the Vikings game one of their best performances in years is a pretty huge stretch.


I think the intent is that it was never really close. The defense ate Cousins up that day. The offense looked really good until Gabriel got hurt.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2019 12:29 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
I agree it feels different because at 3-3 last year we were like "holy crap, they're not awful" and then they went 11-1.

So, that was the standard/expectations for this season. The problem is that they look like shit so far this season.

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 24, 2019 12:36 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
doug - evergreen park wrote:
then they went 11-1.
2005.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: conns7901, FrankDrebin, Hawg Ass, NME, RFDC, The Doctor Of Style, The Man, USA and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group