Chicago Fanatics Message Board • View topic

View unanswered posts | View active topics

Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Bears v. Saints

Page 16 of 16

[ 459 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

Frank Coztansa

Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:18 am

100000 CLUB

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's

I think given the makeshift line that he had in front of them, Montgomery's performance was acceptable.

I do like the commitment that the Bears seemed to have to the running game. It's just unfortunate that when they needed to make a couple of throws, Foles either held the ball too long or made bad throws. And then Graham and Miller dropped very catchable passes at crucial times.

_________________

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

It's more fun to be a victim

Caller Bob wrote:

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

Top

good dolphin

Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:37 am

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82255

The two yard passes to Graham have to stop. He isn't getting you any YAC so a two yard pass will only be a two yard gain...if he catches the ball.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.

Top

veganfan21

Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:40 am

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's

good dolphin wrote:

The two yard passes have to stop.

Fixed

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY

Top

Regular Reader

Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:44 am

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"

Frank Coztansa wrote:

I think given the makeshift line that he had in front of them, Montgomery's performance was acceptable..

I agree with the quality of the effort, but there is no talent there. Unlike with Mooney and Robinson who I was afraid of going in. I have no idea how we passed on the local kid Mooney.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.

Top

Frank Coztansa

Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:47 am

100000 CLUB

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's

Regular Reader wrote:

Frank Coztansa wrote:

I think given the makeshift line that he had in front of them, Montgomery's performance was acceptable..

I agree with the quality of the effort, but there is no talent there. Unlike with Mooney and Robinson who I was afraid of going in. I have no idea how we passed on the local kid Mooney.

I am not saying he is all pro, but behind a better offensive line he would be a serviceable back. It seems there are MANY carries a game where he gets to the line of scrimmage and is immediately surrounded by opposition jerseys.

_________________

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:

It's more fun to be a victim

Caller Bob wrote:

There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.

Top

FavreFan

Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:52 am

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis

The long run by Monty was pretty funny because you knew immediately he wasn't breaking away from anybody.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul

Top

Regular Reader

Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 11:52 am

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"

Frank Coztansa wrote:

Regular Reader wrote:

Frank Coztansa wrote:

I think given the makeshift line that he had in front of them, Montgomery's performance was acceptable..

I agree with the quality of the effort, but there is no talent there. Unlike with Mooney and Robinson who I was afraid of going in. I have no idea how we passed on the local kid Mooney.

Agreed, he's serviceable. The no talent charge is really for the o linemen.

I have no idea why Nagy didn't go downfield more, especially before our d line woke up late.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.

Top

billypootons

Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 1:17 pm

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11008
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store

Regular Reader wrote:

Frank Coztansa wrote:

Regular Reader wrote:

Frank Coztansa wrote:

I think given the makeshift line that he had in front of them, Montgomery's performance was acceptable..

I agree with the quality of the effort, but there is no talent there. Unlike with Mooney and Robinson who I was afraid of going in. I have no idea how we passed on the local kid Mooney.

Agreed, he's serviceable. The no talent charge is really for the o linemen.

I have no idea why Nagy didn't go downfield more, especially before our d line woke up late.

he's too busy calling 5 yard man beaters against zone defenses

Top

KDdidit

Post subject: Re: Bears v. Saints

Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2020 2:06 pm

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23858
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese

The best are continued 5 yard completions in the 2 minute drill in the middle off the field that take 25 seconds each. Kmet's almost fumble was on a useless 3 yard completion where he was stuffed inbounds, stop throwing those.

Top

Page 16 of 16

[ 459 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

Bears v. Saints

Who is online