It is currently Mon May 12, 2025 6:36 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 10:09 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29550
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
KDdidit wrote:
Going into the 2024 season the bears had the 4th easiest strength of schedule based on 2023 results. At the end of the season they had played the 2nd hardest schedule, a difference of 27 spots. Preseason SoS talk is one of those things that moves meters in the off season, but doesn't mean that much when they kick off for real.


So you're saying that the outcomes of games played in 2024 won't determine the outcomes of games played in 2025? Good to know!

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 10:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 25258
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Tall Midget wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Going into the 2024 season the bears had the 4th easiest strength of schedule based on 2023 results. At the end of the season they had played the 2nd hardest schedule, a difference of 27 spots. Preseason SoS talk is one of those things that moves meters in the off season, but doesn't mean that much when they kick off for real.


So you're saying that the outcomes of games played in 2024 won't determine the outcomes of games played in 2025? Good to know!


I'd say the games played in 2025 will be more important than the SoS based on 2024 standings, hth.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 10:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7265
Brick wrote:
I'd say then you should take the under on the 5 wins discussion.


A lot of things would have to go wrong to be under 5 wins. 8-9 wins sounds correct, given the young unproven talent on the offense mixed with the old vets on the line. I am not thrilled at how they ignored the defensive line in the draft. Colston better be a game changer to justify passing up both of the lines.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13124
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Which was the exact same projection that they provided last season with Eberflus as coach. Which strongly suggests that Vegas doesn't believe that Eberflus wasn't nearly the problem that MANY claimed that he happened to be.
You think the Bears are going to win 5 games or less next year?

Brick before you go full bore with "just asking questions" i will simply say this. It is surprising that the preseason prognostication is exactly the same this year as it was last season. Particularly so given the fact that there was universal agreement around here that the previous coach sucked. The win total prediction should be bumped for no other reason than this alone.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 12:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13124
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Tall Midget wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Which was the exact same projection that they provided last season with Eberflus as coach. Which strongly suggests that Vegas doesn't believe that Eberflus wasn't nearly the problem that MANY claimed that he happened to be.
You think the Bears are going to win 5 games or less next year?


The Bears have the second-toughest schedule in the NFL for 2025 (based on the 2024 winning percentages of their opponents).

5 wins isn't out of the question.


Yep.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94633
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Which was the exact same projection that they provided last season with Eberflus as coach. Which strongly suggests that Vegas doesn't believe that Eberflus wasn't nearly the problem that MANY claimed that he happened to be.
You think the Bears are going to win 5 games or less next year?

Brick before you go full bore with "just asking questions" i will simply say this. It is surprising that the preseason prognostication is exactly the same this year as it was last season. Particularly so given the fact that there was universal agreement around here that the previous coach sucked. The win total prediction should be bumped for no other reason than this alone.

But Vegas was wrong. It may have been because the coach performed worse than they thought. He did blow at least two wins.

A 5 win team being over/under of 8.5 means they are predicted to be improved.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 12:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13124
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Which was the exact same projection that they provided last season with Eberflus as coach. Which strongly suggests that Vegas doesn't believe that Eberflus wasn't nearly the problem that MANY claimed that he happened to be.
You think the Bears are going to win 5 games or less next year?

Brick before you go full bore with "just asking questions" i will simply say this. It is surprising that the preseason prognostication is exactly the same this year as it was last season. Particularly so given the fact that there was universal agreement around here that the previous coach sucked. The win total prediction should be bumped for no other reason than this alone.

But Vegas was wrong. It may have been because the coach performed worse than they thought. He did blow at least two wins.

A 5 win team being over/under of 8.5 means they are predicted to be improved.


This has nothing to do with the point.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 12:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94633
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Which was the exact same projection that they provided last season with Eberflus as coach. Which strongly suggests that Vegas doesn't believe that Eberflus wasn't nearly the problem that MANY claimed that he happened to be.
You think the Bears are going to win 5 games or less next year?

Brick before you go full bore with "just asking questions" i will simply say this. It is surprising that the preseason prognostication is exactly the same this year as it was last season. Particularly so given the fact that there was universal agreement around here that the previous coach sucked. The win total prediction should be bumped for no other reason than this alone.

But Vegas was wrong. It may have been because the coach performed worse than they thought. He did blow at least two wins.

A 5 win team being over/under of 8.5 means they are predicted to be improved.


This has nothing to do with the point.

It has everything to do with it. Vegas thought they were good enough last year to be .500. The coach underperforming may have been why they weren't.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7265
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Which was the exact same projection that they provided last season with Eberflus as coach. Which strongly suggests that Vegas doesn't believe that Eberflus wasn't nearly the problem that MANY claimed that he happened to be.
You think the Bears are going to win 5 games or less next year?

Brick before you go full bore with "just asking questions" i will simply say this. It is surprising that the preseason prognostication is exactly the same this year as it was last season. Particularly so given the fact that there was universal agreement around here that the previous coach sucked. The win total prediction should be bumped for no other reason than this alone.


Vegas had the Jets at 10.5 wins last year with Rodgers at QB and a poor head coach. This year Vegas has them at 5.5 wins with Fields at QB and a new head coach. Shouldn't the upgrade at QB, new coach and focus on offense in the draft kept them at 10 wins? They fell all the way down to 5 wins :lol:

Why is that, I wonder?

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 1:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32354
pizza_Place: Milano's
i think Bears will go o8.5, but it feels like the line is set properly at that .

it certainly wouldn't be surprising if they went 6 or 7 . But i think 8-9 is reasonable .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13124
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
It has everything to do with it. Vegas thought they were good enough last year to be .500. The coach underperforming may have been why they weren't.

It has nothing to do with it. My point pertains specifically to prognostications. Not outcomes.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13124
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juiced wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Which was the exact same projection that they provided last season with Eberflus as coach. Which strongly suggests that Vegas doesn't believe that Eberflus wasn't nearly the problem that MANY claimed that he happened to be.
You think the Bears are going to win 5 games or less next year?

Brick before you go full bore with "just asking questions" i will simply say this. It is surprising that the preseason prognostication is exactly the same this year as it was last season. Particularly so given the fact that there was universal agreement around here that the previous coach sucked. The win total prediction should be bumped for no other reason than this alone.


Vegas had the Jets at 10.5 wins last year with Rodgers at QB and a poor head coach. This year Vegas has them at 5.5 wins with Fields at QB and a new head coach. Shouldn't the upgrade at QB, new coach and focus on offense in the draft kept them at 10 wins? They fell all the way down to 5 wins :lol:

Why is that, I wonder?


"Whatabout the Jets" :lol: :lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 1:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13124
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Bagels wrote:
i think Bears will go o8.5, but it feels like the line is set properly at that .

it certainly wouldn't be surprising if they went 6 or 7 . But i think 8-9 is reasonable .


I'm taking the under. Just as i did last season.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7265
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juiced wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Which was the exact same projection that they provided last season with Eberflus as coach. Which strongly suggests that Vegas doesn't believe that Eberflus wasn't nearly the problem that MANY claimed that he happened to be.
You think the Bears are going to win 5 games or less next year?

Brick before you go full bore with "just asking questions" i will simply say this. It is surprising that the preseason prognostication is exactly the same this year as it was last season. Particularly so given the fact that there was universal agreement around here that the previous coach sucked. The win total prediction should be bumped for no other reason than this alone.


Vegas had the Jets at 10.5 wins last year with Rodgers at QB and a poor head coach. This year Vegas has them at 5.5 wins with Fields at QB and a new head coach. Shouldn't the upgrade at QB, new coach and focus on offense in the draft kept them at 10 wins? They fell all the way down to 5 wins :lol:

Why is that, I wonder?


"Whatabout the Jets" :lol: :lol:


Your argument that the Bears should have a better projected record then last year doesn't hold up when you introduce other similar situations. You can't say the Bears should be better then last year and deflect explaining why the Jets are projected to win half as many games as last year in a similar situation.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 3:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13124
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juiced wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juiced wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Which was the exact same projection that they provided last season with Eberflus as coach. Which strongly suggests that Vegas doesn't believe that Eberflus wasn't nearly the problem that MANY claimed that he happened to be.
You think the Bears are going to win 5 games or less next year?

Brick before you go full bore with "just asking questions" i will simply say this. It is surprising that the preseason prognostication is exactly the same this year as it was last season. Particularly so given the fact that there was universal agreement around here that the previous coach sucked. The win total prediction should be bumped for no other reason than this alone.


Vegas had the Jets at 10.5 wins last year with Rodgers at QB and a poor head coach. This year Vegas has them at 5.5 wins with Fields at QB and a new head coach. Shouldn't the upgrade at QB, new coach and focus on offense in the draft kept them at 10 wins? They fell all the way down to 5 wins :lol:

Why is that, I wonder?


"Whatabout the Jets" :lol: :lol:


Your argument that the Bears should have a better projected record then last year doesn't hold up when you introduce other similar situations. You can't say the Bears should be better then last year and deflect explaining why the Jets are projected to win half as many games as last year in a similar situation.


I have yet to compare Justin Fields to Aaron Rodgers. So why are you?

You however have always made Eberflus the problem. You also pined incessantly for this particular coach and QB. Ok now they have both and the predictions are exactly the same as last season. Which is ptecisely why you are playing "whatabout Justin Fields/Jets "currently.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 4:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94633
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
It has everything to do with it. Vegas thought they were good enough last year to be .500. The coach underperforming may have been why they weren't.

It has nothing to do with it. My point pertains specifically to prognostications. Not outcomes.

Vegas thinks the Bears will be 3 to 4 games better this year after firing Eberflus. Do you not get that?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 4:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2816
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
They got worse after firing Matt Eberflus last year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 4:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11320
pizza_Place: Depends
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
It has everything to do with it. Vegas thought they were good enough last year to be .500. The coach underperforming may have been why they weren't.

It has nothing to do with it. My point pertains specifically to prognostications. Not outcomes.

Vegas thinks the Bears will be 3 to 4 games better this year after firing Eberflus. Do you not get that?


vegas had o/u around the same before 2024 season started. too bad i didnt have a time machine because under 6 wins would have been a hell of a bet through 5.99 games played.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13124
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
It has everything to do with it. Vegas thought they were good enough last year to be .500. The coach underperforming may have been why they weren't.

It has nothing to do with it. My point pertains specifically to prognostications. Not outcomes.

Vegas thinks the Bears will be 3 to 4 games better this year after firing Eberflus. Do you not get that?


The attempt at spin isn't working dude. Feel free to continue amusing yourself however

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7265
The Doctor Of Style wrote:

I have yet to compare Justin Fields to Aaron Rodgers. So why are you?

You however have always made Eberflus the problem. You also pined incessantly for this particular coach and QB. Ok now they have both and the predictions are exactly the same as last season. Which is ptecisely why you are playing "whatabout Justin Fields/Jets "currently.


Vegas compared Justin Fields to an old washed up Aaron Rodgers to the tune of 5 wins this year. :lol:

My point is the Vegas numbers are designed to hook you in to bet the over or under on your favorite team. 8.5 is what they think will get people to bet one way or another. There are too many unknown factors to say the Bears will win 10 games or 5 games. People would pound the under at 10 or the over at 5. Are they an 8 win team, probably not. Are they are 10 win team. Most likely not. It's all about the odds.

Last year Vegas knew Eberflus, the O-Line and the D-Line was not good but Caleb, Rome and the new offensive coordinator was the unknowns. They predicted 8 wins and when the offensive coordinator failed with Caleb and Rome it went South fast.

Hopefully this year, Johnson and Co. correct the mistakes from last year and the unknown turns into 10+ wins instead of 5 wins from the 8 Vegas started at.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13124
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juiced wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:

I have yet to compare Justin Fields to Aaron Rodgers. So why are you?

You however have always made Eberflus the problem. You also pined incessantly for this particular coach and QB. Ok now they have both and the predictions are exactly the same as last season. Which is ptecisely why you are playing "whatabout Justin Fields/Jets "currently.


Vegas compared Justin Fields to an old washed up Aaron Rodgers to the tune of 5 wins this year. :lol:

My point is the Vegas numbers are designed to hook you in to bet the over or under on your favorite team. 8.5 is what they think will get people to bet one way or another. There are too many unknown factors to say the Bears will win 10 games or 5 games. People would pound the under at 10 or the over at 5. Are they an 8 win team, probably not. Are they are 10 win team. Most likely not. It's all about the odds.

Last year Vegas knew Eberflus, the O-Line and the D-Line was not good but Caleb, Rome and the new offensive coordinator was the unknowns. They predicted 8 wins and when the offensive coordinator failed with Caleb and Rome it went South fast.

Hopefully this year, Johnson and Co. correct the mistakes from last year and the unknown turns into 10+ wins instead of 5 wins from the 8 Vegas started at.


They can't just throw frivolous numbers out however or else they lose credibility as a service. And no one can predict with certainty with sports because there are too many variables. But it is clear that the Johnson hire wasn't viewed as enthusisticaly by them as it was viewed by "us" or else there would be an actual bump from last season

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 5:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2023 3:52 pm
Posts: 536
pizza_Place: not Pequod's
The new coach is the main reason the number is as high as it is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 5:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94633
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
It has everything to do with it. Vegas thought they were good enough last year to be .500. The coach underperforming may have been why they weren't.

It has nothing to do with it. My point pertains specifically to prognostications. Not outcomes.

Vegas thinks the Bears will be 3 to 4 games better this year after firing Eberflus. Do you not get that?


The attempt at spin isn't working dude. Feel free to continue amusing yourself however

It's not spin. Vegas is saying the Bears are better than last year. How can that be?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 13124
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
It has everything to do with it. Vegas thought they were good enough last year to be .500. The coach underperforming may have been why they weren't.

It has nothing to do with it. My point pertains specifically to prognostications. Not outcomes.

Vegas thinks the Bears will be 3 to 4 games better this year after firing Eberflus. Do you not get that?


The attempt at spin isn't working dude. Feel free to continue amusing yourself however

It's not spin. Vegas is saying the Bears are better than last year. How can that be?


The prognostications are exactly the same. How can that be if they have a vastly superior coach?

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 12, 2025 5:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94633
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
It has everything to do with it. Vegas thought they were good enough last year to be .500. The coach underperforming may have been why they weren't.

It has nothing to do with it. My point pertains specifically to prognostications. Not outcomes.

Vegas thinks the Bears will be 3 to 4 games better this year after firing Eberflus. Do you not get that?


The attempt at spin isn't working dude. Feel free to continue amusing yourself however

It's not spin. Vegas is saying the Bears are better than last year. How can that be?


The prognostications are exactly the same. How can that be if they have a vastly superior coach?

Because we have evidence that lets us know exactly how good they were last year and this year they are predicted to improve.

You think they win 5 or less next year?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group