cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
Now we have Rick throwing out baseless accusations that Rex doesn't prepare for games. If anything the stories are that Orton doesn't work as hard as Rex does.
It is not a baseless accusation. Did you not watch how he performed in the game that Orton got injured? It was crystal clear that he barely knew what was going on in that game. Any Bears fan could see that he was completely unprepared to play that day. When they showed him on the bench, he barely seemed to be paying attention. We saw that was true in that game.
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
In fact in Bourbonnais Orton was kissing media patootie while rex was taking extra work with the coaches.
Can you stop making stuff up please? It makes it hard to take you seriously.
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
I'm so sick of hearing he was handed the job on a silver platter. He was the best QB according to the coaches in camp and during HIS FIRST FULL YEAR as a starter they went to the Super Bowl. Next season he had 3 whole games before being benched.
He was the best QB because they never had any competition brought in because Rex was "there guy". Angelo's inability to bring in a decent backup cost us games and possibly a Super Bowl. Take a look at Kurt Warner in Arizona. He's just one example of a QB the Bears could have had but they refused to tell them they could compete for the starting job.
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
If anything Orton was handed the job this year. He did not outperform Rex there was obviously no competition he had a whole better half in one preseason game.
He outperformed him. He's better than him. How did Rex perform when he got actual playing time this year? He's not a good QB. Maybe it was injuries. Maybe it was he mentally couldn't handle it. Maybe he is too short and can't see over people. 99% of the people on this board have figured it out.
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
Orton has nearly the same TO percentage despite his first season asked to manage the offense and do everything you can to avoid turnovers.
What does his rookie season have to do with who is better now? Orton was supposed to be holding a clipboard all year and his rookie season is about as important now as the six game stretch that Rex was good. It's 2008 and almost 2009.
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
It just dawned on me Boilermaker means Purdue so no wonder Rick is in love with Orton.
You are a quick one. Let me guess, you like the Cubs and are a girl.
I'm also not in love with Orton. Even when he was playing good pre-injury I wanted the Bears to take a QB in the first four rounds next year and have a real competition. Personally, I would like to see Orton do well because I like him but if he keeps playing like he did the past 4 games then I'll have no problem calling for him to be benched just like I did with Rex for a few years. I'm a Bears fan #1 and I just want them to win. I also won't complain about him being booed or Bears fans getting what they deserve if he goes somewhere and does good. Kyle Orton is the best QB on the Bears roster and until he's not he's my guy.
By the way, I've pretty much been right on in the Orton vs. Rex debate the whole time I've been posting here. I thought Orton should have been benched as a rookie. I started to buy into Rex Grossman when he played awesome but I wasn't totally sold and I was calling for him to be benched when it was clear that he couldn't stop himself from making dumb throws(by the way, if Orton continues to make dumb throws I'll do the same for him). The fact that you still think Rex is a better option means you've been wrong for at least a year.
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
And by the way he never hit free agency last season so there's no telling if there would be a better option out there. Lovie and turner lied to him about being given a chance to compete for the job going into the 08 season.
If there was a better option out there, Rex would have taken it. He found little to no interest in him and returned to the Bears. The fact he didn't wait until the start of free agency to resign doesn't mean he didn't somehow gauge other teams interest.
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
Smith and Turner wanted to play it safe. The safe option is Orton. It won't get you to the Super Bowl but you'll probably win 9 or 10 games and lose in the first round of the playoffs if you make it.
You don't honestly think Rex Grossman is the reason the Bears made the Super Bowl do you? The fact that he found a way not to turn the ball over 3 or 4 times in a few playoff games doesn't mean he got us there.
cubbiegirlshamus wrote:
Smith and Turner also listened to the media and idiot fans. That's why they should be fired. The day any decision is made based on the media and the fans the coaches should be fired.
[/quote]
This will be the 6th year where Rex Grossman started a game for the Bears or was the starter in the preseason. I don't think the idiot fans are the one that have given up on him. Let's go over it one more time. Rex Grossman started a game for the Bears in every season for half a decade and failed to establish himself as the starter. He was then beat out by a fourth round pick game manager who went on to play better than Rex Grossman had since the six game stretch where he somehow found a way to play well.
Smith and Turner will be in Chicago longer than Rex will and they'll both be in the league longer than Rex.