veganfan21 wrote:
You're missing the forest for the trees here. We've been through this before with Trubinsky - against Dallas and a few other teams last year, etc. He seemingly balls out and makes people like you go "hey, wait a minute here, if Nagy just does this or that, and if Trubinsky still does this or that, and if Robinson just does that, then we might have a competetent QB here! Yay!"
I'm not missing anything. We get an extra year of looking at (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky for free this year based on how his contract is. That's it. He gets credit when he has a good game and he did yesterday. At the end of the year, we can analyze his whole season and decide if he deserves to come back.
veganfan21 wrote:
Meanwhile, fans less emotionally attached to Trubinsky realize that he's just a highly erratic QB who's impressive peaks aren't representative of him just as his terrible valleys aren't necessariy representative of him either. You have to take the highs and lows together, not just zero in on the highs and dream. That's what you're doing, you're fundamentally a dreamer when you talk about "glimmer of hope" this far into the guy's career. Cutting your losses is most definitely the right move.
What does this even mean? Who is ignoring his lows?
I would tend towards cutting your losses at the end of the year too at this point, but it was completely wrong to not want him to come back this year on a free tryout to see if he does improve enough. Even if it's a 1% chance of that. Add in the fact that he won the QB competition against a guy who was worthy of spending a 4th round pick for and it's even better.
Your problem is that you seem to think because people think (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky has a chance to be good based on some of the good things he does that people think (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky is a future hall of famer. I'm going to enjoy it when (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky plays well and give him credit for it.