It is currently Tue Apr 01, 2025 6:46 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 345 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12612
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
The Bad thing for Caleb supporters is that he doesn't even fare well when you play the game on their terms. His Stats suck too.

Now in terms of Johnson. He's a play action guy and Caleb sucks at play action and playing under center. I'm not nearly the guru that I used to be, but usually that is something that is not easily corrected from what I remember.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12612
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juiced wrote:
RFDC wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
RFDC wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I guess he doesn't agree with the assessment of Caleb by some of the board notables

I wouldn't exactly consider that to be a positive.

The best coaching candidate of the last 2 years picks the Bears job and there is no doubt a huge reason he picked it is because of Williams. He disagrees with your assessment. We will see who is right.


That "WE" will. But I expect the excuse making to start as soon as the games actually begin. "New Coach" "Rookie Coach" "3rd HC in 1+seasons" "Ownership" "GM" Yadda Yadda Yadda. One thing is for sure as "WE" well know. He whom is considered by CFMB posters to be the savior in January will undoubtedly be viewed by MANY to be the pariah by November. That much "WE" know.

There is going to be that happening either way it goes. If Williams and Johnson do a good job there will be excuses to try and show they really are not doing a good job.


If Caleb does well, Justin CULT will say, "He is nothing more than a system QB. Would be a bust without Johnson." If Caleb struggles, " Even Johnson couldn't unlock his "generational" talents." blah blah blah. Meanwhile, Justin will be bench warming for some team or starting for the Browns/Jets or some shit show franchise that want to punt the season for a real QB in 2026 draft. No way T.Brady wants Justin in LV.


Have you no shame? This dude was the Grand Poobah when it came to making excuses. Even after whining about people making excuses :lol: :lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Last edited by The Doctor Of Style on Tue Jan 21, 2025 12:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12612
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
But to answer your question, overall Caleb's passer rating was not great.


Yours Truly. Brick McCarver. There is nothing which suggests that Caleb played "very well" last season. Which is the point. He's closer to Anthony Richardson than he is Mahomes. That should scare the shit out of anyone that is a Bears fan. Which I am.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 12:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94208
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
But to answer your question, overall Caleb's passer rating was not great.


Yours Truly. Brick McCarver. There is nothing which suggests that Caleb played "very well" last season. Which is the point. He's closer to Anthony Richardson than he is Mahomes. That should scare the shit out of anyone that is a Bears fan. Which I am.

The Doctor Of Misquotes. Overall, Caleb didn't play "very well" last season but I haven't seen anyone argue he did. He had many very good games and many very bad games.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 12:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 25046
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12612
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
But to answer your question, overall Caleb's passer rating was not great.


Yours Truly. Brick McCarver. There is nothing which suggests that Caleb played "very well" last season. Which is the point. He's closer to Anthony Richardson than he is Mahomes. That should scare the shit out of anyone that is a Bears fan. Which I am.

The Doctor Of Misquotes. Overall, Caleb didn't play "very well" last season but I haven't seen anyone argue he did. He had many very good games and many very bad games.


Need just a bit more to go off than Passer Rating Brick. He went nearly 5 games in which he didn't throw a touchdown. Were those "very good games" too? How about all of the games in which he failed to throw or produce a TD?

Because I never remember you using Justin Fields passer rating as an example of his "playing very well". In fact his passer rating was 93 for the season. In 5 of the 6 games that he started his rating was greater than 91. Hardly and example of your thinking that he "played well" as I recall.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 12:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94208
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Need just a bit more to go off than Passer Rating Brick. He went nearly 5 games in which he didn't throw a touchdown. Were those "very good games" too? How about all of the games in which he failed to throw or produce a TD?
He threw a touchdown in all the games he had a 95 or better passer rating besides the Packers game they lost but should have won and he completed 75 percent of his passes in that game.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 1:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 25046
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
KDdidit wrote:

lol it got deleted

Let's hear it for Bluesky

https://bsky.app/profile/bearsfan4life1 ... bezptack2n


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 1:55 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57845
Has there been any word on when a press conference will be?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4391
pizza_Place: Lino's
Caleb is one of many offensive players that need to be evaluated. Wondering if the launching of the analytics guy was a condition of Johnson taking the job, but it is painfully obvious that whoever was in charge of evaluating offensive talent and defensive front seven guys players needed to be replaced.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 31000
RFDC wrote:
Has there been any word on when a press conference will be?

11:00 tomorrow

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 33564
pizza_Place: What??
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Need just a bit more to go off than Passer Rating Brick. He went nearly 5 games in which he didn't throw a touchdown. Were those "very good games" too? How about all of the games in which he failed to throw or produce a TD?
He threw a touchdown in all the games he had a 95 or better passer rating besides the Packers game they lost but should have won and he completed 75 percent of his passes in that game.

That is a pathetic post. It reminds me of a Sox scoreboard fun fact in '83.

"Julio Cruz is hitting .279 in 13 of his last 19 games."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12612
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Need just a bit more to go off than Passer Rating Brick. He went nearly 5 games in which he didn't throw a touchdown. Were those "very good games" too? How about all of the games in which he failed to throw or produce a TD?
He threw a touchdown in all the games he had a 95 or better passer rating besides the Packers game they lost but should have won and he completed 75 percent of his passes in that game.


In 2 of the games in which you claimed that he played "very well" he threw for less than 160 yards. You've previously used 200 yards as evidence that someone played well. Why has this not been used in this instance? Just Asking A Question

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Last edited by The Doctor Of Style on Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12612
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Clawmaster wrote:
Caleb is one of many offensive players that need to be evaluated. Wondering if the launching of the analytics guy was a condition of Johnson taking the job, but it is painfully obvious that whoever was in charge of evaluating offensive talent and defensive front seven guys players needed to be replaced.


Yeah I probably wouldn't resign Keenan Allen. Though he wasn't a liability this past season he wasn't as good as advertised. Looked old and slow. Grab a Quality 3rd and even 4th receiver and you're likely to get better production at a cheaper price.

Swift looks like a 3rd down back masquerading as a lead back. I'd probably seek out a guy that can get between the tackles and power run a little more.

They also need a better backup in the event that Caleb sucks again. You cannot have an inexperienced QB as his backup next year. If Caleb cannot move the offense by game 3 or 4 bench his ass.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4391
pizza_Place: Lino's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Caleb is one of many offensive players that need to be evaluated. Wondering if the launching of the analytics guy was a condition of Johnson taking the job, but it is painfully obvious that whoever was in charge of evaluating offensive talent and defensive front seven guys players needed to be replaced.


Yeah I probably wouldn't resign Keenan Allen. Though he wasn't a liability this past season he wasn't as good as advertised. Looked old and slow. Grab a Quality 3rd and even 3th receiver and you're likely to get better production at a cheaper price.

Swift looks like a 3rd down back masquerading as a lead back. I'd probably seek out a guy that can get between the tackles and power run a little more.

They also need a better backup in the event that Caleb sucks again. You cannot have an inexperienced QB as his backup next year. If Caleb cannot move the offense by game 3 or 4 bench his ass.


If you go back and watch the Lions games you will see that they always come out and try to establish the run. Plenty of early carries for Montgomery between the tackles, that then sets up the play action game later. Interesting to see the name Najee Harris mentioned as a possible FA signing, he would fit the bill as a big back that can run between the tackles. Do think they either draft or sign another RB.

It is blatantly obvious that they need to upgrade the interior of the offensive line, likely bring in a veteran center and guard, maybe draft a guard and tackle, but if you are going to try to start two rookies on the line you need solid vets to teach them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94208
Location: To the left of my post
Nardi wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Need just a bit more to go off than Passer Rating Brick. He went nearly 5 games in which he didn't throw a touchdown. Were those "very good games" too? How about all of the games in which he failed to throw or produce a TD?
He threw a touchdown in all the games he had a 95 or better passer rating besides the Packers game they lost but should have won and he completed 75 percent of his passes in that game.

That is a pathetic post. It reminds me of a Sox scoreboard fun fact in '83.

"Julio Cruz is hitting .279 in 13 of his last 19 games."
I was simply answering Dr. Styles question.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94208
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Need just a bit more to go off than Passer Rating Brick. He went nearly 5 games in which he didn't throw a touchdown. Were those "very good games" too? How about all of the games in which he failed to throw or produce a TD?
He threw a touchdown in all the games he had a 95 or better passer rating besides the Packers game they lost but should have won and he completed 75 percent of his passes in that game.


In 2 of the games in which you claimed that he played "very well" he threw for less than 160 yards. You've previously used 200 yards as evidence that someone played well. Why has this not been used in this instance? Just Asking A Question

I never used it as an example of playing well to throw for 200 yards. I did point out that we cheered when Justin Fields hit 200 yards passing.

This is stupid though. If you have a 95 rating in a close game you played well. This shouldn't even be an argument.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10991
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Add me to the list of people shocked this got done. I don't know if Ben Johnson is good Head Coach, but we can honestly say this was NOT a stupid decision. I can't fault them for this hire. Just as I cannot fault them for taking Caleb 1 overall last year. Caleb may end up being a bust, but a sizable majority of expert and teams thought Caleb was the clear #1 pick.

Yet....the McCaskeys still own and run the Bears. I can acknowledge them making the correct decision, while fully knowing they will make a whole lot of other STUPID decisions. I would love to be wrong, but Ben Johnson maxes out at 3 seasons and will get fired.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12612
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Need just a bit more to go off than Passer Rating Brick. He went nearly 5 games in which he didn't throw a touchdown. Were those "very good games" too? How about all of the games in which he failed to throw or produce a TD?
He threw a touchdown in all the games he had a 95 or better passer rating besides the Packers game they lost but should have won and he completed 75 percent of his passes in that game.


In 2 of the games in which you claimed that he played "very well" he threw for less than 160 yards. You've previously used 200 yards as evidence that someone played well. Why has this not been used in this instance? Just Asking A Question

I never used it as an example of playing well to throw for 200 yards. I did point out that we cheered when Justin Fields hit 200 yards passing.

This is stupid though. If you have a 95 rating in a close game you played well. This shouldn't even be an argument.

Justin Fields hit that # in 4 of 6 games and you repeatedly claimed that he played poorly.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10991
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Need just a bit more to go off than Passer Rating Brick. He went nearly 5 games in which he didn't throw a touchdown. Were those "very good games" too? How about all of the games in which he failed to throw or produce a TD?
He threw a touchdown in all the games he had a 95 or better passer rating besides the Packers game they lost but should have won and he completed 75 percent of his passes in that game.


In 2 of the games in which you claimed that he played "very well" he threw for less than 160 yards. You've previously used 200 yards as evidence that someone played well. Why has this not been used in this instance? Just Asking A Question

I never used it as an example of playing well to throw for 200 yards. I did point out that we cheered when Justin Fields hit 200 yards passing.

This is stupid though. If you have a 95 rating in a close game you played well. This shouldn't even be an argument.

Justin Fields hit that # in 4 of 6 games and you repeatedly claimed that he played poorly.

I'm here to remind you the Justin Fields is not a very good NFL QB. The evidence is there for everyone to see. Love ya, Dr. Style!

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94208
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Justin Fields hit that # in 4 of 6 games and you repeatedly claimed that he played poorly.
What 4 out of 6 games are you talking about?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12612
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
BigW72 wrote:
. Caleb may end up being a bust, but a sizable majority of expert and teams thought Caleb was the clear #1 pick.
.
But Poles is the only one in charge of drafting him. As a,talent evaluator the only opinion that matters are his and the people he pays to evaluate. If he is basing his opinion on what Todd McShay or Mel Kiper says then he shouldn't have the job. He should have did a helluva lot more vetting of this kid than he did.
He clearly bought into the bluster regarding this kid being "Generational" based on the way that he approached the day. Hopefully Johnson can "fix" this kid and turn him into a quality QB. I wouldn't hold my breath on him turning him into a top 5 QB however or top 10 either.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Last edited by The Doctor Of Style on Tue Jan 21, 2025 3:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11253
pizza_Place: Depends
again.... with the justin fields talk.... the last thing on my mind is justin fields right now. i'd suggest you move on... maybe if fields actually starts somewhere and makes the playoffs you can actually pine for him as the one that got away.

they got the best offensive coach available to be HC. they are giving caleb the best chance possible to succeed in chicago (knowing the limitations of this franchise). that is all i care about moving forward


Last edited by billypootons on Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12612
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Justin Fields hit that # in 4 of 6 games and you repeatedly claimed that he played poorly.
What 4 out of 6 games are you talking about?


This year he had a 95 or better passer rating in 4 games out of the 6 that he started. His rating for the year was 93. Likely higher before they started using him as a "secret weapon"

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12612
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
billypootons wrote:
again.... with the justin fields talk.... the last thing on my mind is justin fields right now. i'd suggest you move on... maybe if fields actually starts somewhere and makes the playoffs you can actually pine for him as the one that got away.

they got the best offensive coach available to be HC. they are giving caleb the best chance possible to succeed here. that is all i care about moving forward


He'll likely be Pittsburgh's starting QB next season and the Bears are on the schedule. Saddle Up Boys! :lol: :lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94208
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Justin Fields hit that # in 4 of 6 games and you repeatedly claimed that he played poorly.
What 4 out of 6 games are you talking about?


This year he had a 95 or better passer rating in 4 games out of the 6 that he started. His rating for the year was 93. Likely higher before they started using him as a "secret weapon"

None of these numbers match with reality. Is this in Pittsburgh?

In Pittsburgh, he passed for more than 200 yards twice in six starts.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 3:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12612
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Justin Fields hit that # in 4 of 6 games and you repeatedly claimed that he played poorly.
What 4 out of 6 games are you talking about?


This year he had a 95 or better passer rating in 4 games out of the 6 that he started. His rating for the year was 93. Likely higher before they started using him as a "secret weapon"

None of these numbers match with reality. Is this in Pittsburgh?

In Pittsburgh, he passed for more than 200 yards twice in six starts.


What happened to 95 passer rating being the "very well" playing metric

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11253
pizza_Place: Depends
glad justin fields is the main topic of the ben johnson HC thread. very relevant.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94208
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Justin Fields hit that # in 4 of 6 games and you repeatedly claimed that he played poorly.
What 4 out of 6 games are you talking about?


This year he had a 95 or better passer rating in 4 games out of the 6 that he started. His rating for the year was 93. Likely higher before they started using him as a "secret weapon"

None of these numbers match with reality. Is this in Pittsburgh?

In Pittsburgh, he passed for more than 200 yards twice in six starts.


What happened to 95 passer rating being the "very well" playing metric

Now that we've established that your stats that were wrong in multiple ways are referring to his time as a starter in Pittsburgh we can continue.

I don't think I said that he played poorly in Pittsburgh. I am happy to let you post a quote though as I don't completely remember.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Fire Ben Johnson
PostPosted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 12612
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
billypootons wrote:
glad justin fields is the main topic of the ben johnson HC thread. very relevant.

I'm sorry that I don't get "moist" when discussing coaching hires. Or personnel moves in general. We are cheerleading a hire in the hopes that it would lead us back to mediocrity. Which is how 99% of Bears discussions on here and the score tend to be. If not this then the incessant Packer fan trolling even as we get curbstomped every year.

One of the reasons that this season was an utter disaster is because MANY pf the same guys that are now "Moist" were moist this time last year for Caleb. I'm not interested in "winning" offseasons or "press conferences". Again so "Score like" in philosophy. You win games on the field. And Rookie Unproven coaches coupled with a bad, unproven QB is usually a recipe for disaster.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 345 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group