It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:43 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Still taking Peyton Manning over Rodgers. :wink:

:lol:

Yeah, and Brady and Brees too!

me too but i really like the one i have

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:19 pm
Posts: 980
It isn't about blaming coaches for the fuck of it. Or misplaced anger. The pitiful mistakes are one thing. Year after year this guy makes rookie mistakes, terrible clock management, etc, but where the was o-gameplan? The whole talk last week was that the Packers can be run on, what the fuck happened to that?

The inherent mismatches that you can eat up the 3-4 with, which despite running a hybrid like the Bears, is the Packers base defense, those mismatches and blown coverages only come when the running game is a factor. And they never gave it a chance.

The Bears passing game is hinged upon the play-action pass. It is where Cutler is at his best. It is where the big play happens. And to not stick with the running game, or really even commit to it in the first place, is unforgivable.

If your QB is obviously struggling, to the point the throws two passes into the hands of the Packers secondary, that should have been picked off, why would you continue to force the pass, until he finally throws in the INT? Calm the situation. Run the ball. And maybe you end up kicking, but it is a lot better to not force the issue, and maybe the kid settles in. Instead, the Packers ended up with 100+ INT return yards.

_________________
"Mattress technology has come a long way"

- Dan Bernstein, 2016


Last edited by mrgoodkat on Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:35 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Tall Midget wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
Yeah, but your defense just held the Packers to 13 points or so (the first TD was after they got the ball on the 3). Besides, I've been reading on this board for years now how overrated Urlacher is. So it should be no big deal, at least to those people, right?

Yeah, but the Packers started a right tackle who doesn't belong in the NFL, which explains Ogunleye's success rushing the qb. The rest of the defensive line was invisible on the pass rush. Tommie Harris may very well be done.

I was on board for cutting him before last season.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:34 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Irish Boy wrote:
I think everyone should step off the fucking ledge.


Why? This doesn't look good for the Bears.

The defense is headed towards another season of suck, and I've never been that impressed by Forte or Olsen. Cutler will throw some TDs, but he's going to be running for his life pretty frequently if the offensive line doesn't regain its quickness off the ball. This is depressing....talk me off the ledge, IB. :(

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Tall Midget wrote:
Irish Boy wrote:
I think everyone should step off the fucking ledge.


Why? This doesn't look good for the Bears.

The defense is headed towards another season of suck, and I've never been that impressed by Forte or Olsen. Cutler will throw some TDs, but he's going to be running for his life pretty frequently if the offensive line doesn't regain its quickness off the ball. This is depressing....talk me off the ledge, IB. :(


Maybe I was watching a different game, but the pass protection was pretty decent. Run-blocking was the problem, especially on the inside, but the pass protection was OK for the amount of blitzing GB was doing. The offense left 11 points in the red zone, and they handed the Packers their first TD. The defense something like 225 yards of total offense, 50 of which was on the one unfortunate play; GB isn't a great rushing team, but they really couldn't do anything. Some of those things are going to regress, especially on defense, in absence or Urlacher, but you just played a game where the QB threw three INTs, including a functional pick-6, on the road against one of the better teams in the NFC and you were leading with a minute and a half to play. And, as Tillman and Bowman get healthier and can play full games (assuming they stay healthy, which might be a big assumption) the defensive backfield will improve.

The things that were bad tend to be high-variance, fluky types of things (turnover, red-zone production), and the things they did well are more significant over time.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
I thought the rookie safety Afalalalala looked good.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
RFDC wrote:
I thought the rookie safety Afalalalala looked good.


I thought so as well. Kevin Payne is still terrible, however.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
the defense played a bad line but dominated the gaps and overall the secondary played well against a great set of recievers. Cutler will play better obviously and i thought bennett looked decent. I think the bears are a good team if they can get average play from hunter the rest of the season

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Isn't the Lovie Smith experiment just about over? Now that the Bears finally have a legitimate pro bowl QB, it is about time the Bears act like a big time organization & hire a proven head coach who can put together a staff of assistants, a game plan, & someone who doesnt treat the fans like they are dumb fucks.
Why do the Bears always hire first time head coaches? Wanny, Jauron, Lovie...I am sick of it.

The Bears deserve one of the following coaches:

Bill Cowher
Jon Gruden
Mike Shanahan

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
I would gladly take Cowher.

But no thanks on Shanny. Lovie's record over the last few years was better than his and he basically did nothing after losing Elway and Davis.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33813
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
The routes all look the same to me. They did not stack the tight ends as much as I thought they should. They could have tried play action sets. He is slow to make adjustments/no counter to the blitz. It was like Cutler was flinging it up with no strategy of how to beat the defense until towards the end of the game. A lot of what goodkat said is true. This is not new and it is coaching. Turner is terrible.

I don't know if GB was having an off game but their offense didn't do much. The defense deserves credit for this game and I hope it continues. Maybe Marinelli is way better than babich because the talent is not as good as it was the last few years.

Ugeuth, when Brady was injured last year was NE as successful as they were because Cassel was that good or did the coaching staff help?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:46 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38348
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
I expect a big day for Bears special teams.


Thanks a**hole

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
RFDC wrote:
I would gladly take Cowher.

But no thanks on Shanny. Lovie's record over the last few years was better than his and he basically did nothing after losing Elway and Davis.


Shanny knows Offense. I would gladly take Shanny right now.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
Scorehead wrote:
RFDC wrote:
I would gladly take Cowher.

But no thanks on Shanny. Lovie's record over the last few years was better than his and he basically did nothing after losing Elway and Davis.


Shanny knows Offense. I would gladly take Shanny right now.


It sure did not show in his last few years in Denver. Look at the records and the playoff appearances. Lovie trumps him in both.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
Hank Baskett is available for scraps. Any interest there?

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 4:53 pm
Posts: 7823
Location: Gai Paree
pizza_Place: Pisa Pizza, Countryside
did anyone else get pissed off when Lovie said:

"Our defense didn't perform well, 0 takeaways, you guys[the media] focus too much on total yards allowed"


It's consistent with what he's been saying throughout his tenure as head coach, but to place the entire burden of success on takeaways seems a bit meatballish to me...

_________________
team Mully & Hanley
team Meatpants


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 8:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 9:59 pm
Posts: 11512
pizza_Place: *
crosscheck wrote:
did anyone else get pissed off when Lovie said:

"Our defense didn't perform well, 0 takeaways, you guys[the media] focus too much on total yards allowed"


It's consistent with what he's been saying throughout his tenure as head coach, but to place the entire burden of success on takeaways seems a bit meatballish to me...


No, guess being pissed off would mean that I actually expected a good thought from him,typical Lovie! You are right, he has been all about the takeaways, but for him to think that's the whole of it, is just a joke.

_________________
You never miss your wealth, till your well went dry
Seem like only yesterday, you were here smiling
Now you gone away, but I know you in a better place
No traces of you, what can I do?
Alone and confused


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
crosscheck wrote:
did anyone else get pissed off when Lovie said:

"Our defense didn't perform well, 0 takeaways, you guys[the media] focus too much on total yards allowed"


It's consistent with what he's been saying throughout his tenure as head coach, but to place the entire burden of success on takeaways seems a bit meatballish to me...


I'm of two minds on this:

I think turnovers, for the most part, are highly random. There's no real controlling when they happen in a lot of instances, besides from reinforcing players to strip the ball when appropriate, etc. However, nothing has a bigger impact than turnovers. I don't think the focus is meatballish, but maybe Sisyphean.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Scorehead wrote:
Isn't the Lovie Smith experiment just about over? Now that the Bears finally have a legitimate pro bowl QB, it is about time the Bears act like a big time organization & hire a proven head coach who can put together a staff of assistants, a game plan, & someone who doesnt treat the fans like they are dumb fucks.
Why do the Bears always hire first time head coaches? Wanny, Jauron, Lovie...I am sick of it.

The Bears deserve one of the following coaches:

Bill Cowher
Jon Gruden
Mike Shanahan

So your new obsession is Lovie Smith?
Are you gonna post it all over the board in every thread a la MEatPAnts?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
crosscheck wrote:
did anyone else get pissed off when Lovie said:

"Our defense didn't perform well, 0 takeaways, you guys[the media] focus too much on total yards allowed"


It's consistent with what he's been saying throughout his tenure as head coach, but to place the entire burden of success on takeaways seems a bit meatballish to me...


I dont give a shit how many turnovers the Defense gets, as long as the D holds the opposing Offense in yardage & points & we win the game. Lovie is the only head coach who's primary game plan seems to be getting turnovers on Defense. The Bears D should focus more on tackling technique rather than turnovers. Turnovers are ramdom events, & most of the time they happen not because the D player caused the turnover, but rather the ballcarrier just loses the handle.
The Bears Defense played a pretty good game against Green Bay, yet Lovie isn't happy because they didnt get any turnovers, & he takes a shot at the media.
What a dumb ass...

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
spanky wrote:
Hank Baskett is available for scraps. Any interest there?


I posted this before I read this thread. I would be interested.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Scorehead wrote:
Turnovers are ramdom events, & most of the time they happen not because the D player caused the turnover, but rather the ballcarrier just loses the handle.
.



Wow. :shock:

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
Northside_Dan wrote:
Scorehead wrote:
Turnovers are ramdom events, & most of the time they happen not because the D player caused the turnover, but rather the ballcarrier just loses the handle.
.



Wow. :shock:


Believe it or not, that's actually mostly true.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
Irish Boy wrote:

Believe it or not, that's actually mostly true.


I guess it depends on your definition on losing the handle. I might have taken JohnKirk's point to literally.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:32 pm
Posts: 11750
pizza_Place: ***
There's very little correlation in certain types of turnovers. No teams recover fumbles better than others, regardless of what you hear. The QB has a bigger impact on INTs than the defense does. The one area that actually does make a difference is causing footballs, which the Bears actually do reinforce and have been good at for quite some time.

Nevertheless, if you're going to focus on one thing, turnovers might not be the worst thing to do it, as even a slight improvement can have drastic effects for your team.

_________________
Fire Phil Emery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
spmack wrote:
spanky wrote:
Hank Baskett is available for scraps. Any interest there?


I posted this before I read this thread. I would be interested.

It's faster if you just type "Damn, Spanky wins".

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
spanky wrote:
spmack wrote:
spanky wrote:
Hank Baskett is available for scraps. Any interest there?


I posted this before I read this thread. I would be interested.

It's faster if you just type "Damn, Spanky wins".


Not really. More people posted to my thread. Mine is bigger than yours.* :wink:

*Yes, fully aware of mult ramification.....

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:26 pm 
spmack wrote:
Not really. More people posted to my thread. Mine is bigger than yours.* :wink:

*Yes, fully aware of mult ramification.....

STFU Mult, You need to get a hobby Kid!


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
spwack wrote:
spmack wrote:
Not really. More people posted to my thread. Mine is bigger than yours.* :wink:

*Yes, fully aware of mult ramification.....

STFU Mult, You need to get a hobby Kid!


Yes, Kid does need to get a hobby. :thumbdown:

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bears Game 1/16
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
spmack wrote:
spwack wrote:
spmack wrote:
Not really. More people posted to my thread. Mine is bigger than yours.* :wink:

*Yes, fully aware of mult ramification.....

STFU Mult, You need to get a hobby Kid!


Yes, Kid does need to get a hobby. :thumbdown:

pizza place: mulitple is pretty good though


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 158 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: The Doctor Of Style, USA and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group