It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 6:37 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 281 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13260
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
NME wrote:
Also, he rebuilt in Carolina like others have said.
Does he also get credit for blowing that team up?

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
all this bickering really shows that a coach is only as good as his players.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:14 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
After 2003 they missed on pretty much every draft.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:16 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hatchetman wrote:
all this bickering really shows that a coach is only as good as his players.


Players matter but the elite coaches will find a way to be good. Fox is an average coach though. Obviously that's an upgrade over Trestman and Tucker but normally you need more to win.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 8:31 pm
Posts: 232
pizza_Place: whatever
Nas wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
all this bickering really shows that a coach is only as good as his players.


Players matter but the elite coaches will find a way to be good. Fox is an average coach though. Obviously that's an upgrade over Trestman and Tucker but normally you need more to win.


Joe Gibbs. 3 different QBs, 3 SBs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
I don't think Gibbs is looking for a gig, but I'm all for it if he's interested.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Fox hasn't done anything over the past 3 years that leads me to believe he is the right guy for this Bears team.
I'd say coaching in the Super Bowl less than one calendar year ago is a good thing.

He took over a 1-15 Carolina team and had them in the Super Bowl two seasons later. That Carolina team had started the year 1-0 then dropped the rest of the games that season. They were the second team in the NFL history to lost 15 in a row.
He also followed a 12-4 season with an 8-8 & then a 2-14. How many "good" coaches have a 2-14 season on their resume?

Jimmy Johnson was 1-15


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
Nas wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
all this bickering really shows that a coach is only as good as his players.


Players matter but the elite coaches will find a way to be good. Fox is an average coach though. Obviously that's an upgrade over Trestman and Tucker but normally you need more to win.


I don't think he is elite but his production is already beyond average.

I am normally one who advocates for taking a shot at great rather than settling for the known good. I don't think that was the best course of action for the Bears at this time. Unlike others, I think they have the offensive horses to be competitive today. They lacked direction. This hire should change that condition.

I am much more bullish on the Bears for next year than the general public.

If I am wrong, well, everything will be easily disassembled in another couple of years.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:31 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
all this bickering really shows that a coach is only as good as his players.


Players matter but the elite coaches will find a way to be good. Fox is an average coach though. Obviously that's an upgrade over Trestman and Tucker but normally you need more to win.


I don't think he is elite but his production is already beyond average.

I am normally one who advocates for taking a shot at great rather than settling for the known good. I don't think that was the best course of action for the Bears at this time. Unlike others, I think they have the offensive horses to be competitive today. They lacked direction. This hire should change that condition.

I am much more bullish on the Bears for next year than the general public.

If I am wrong, well, everything will be easily disassembled in another couple of years.


I think 81-79 (before Manning) is pretty average. Offensively the Bears still have talent but defensively this team is beyond awful. I think a guy like Fox was the perfect replacement for Lovie. I don't expect Fox to turn our defense into a top 15 unit overnight. That's his expertise.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Marshall & Forte are in decline mode and they are your best players. who cares if they go 8-8 next year. they have a tough schedule. Blow this bitch up and build a team that can compete year-in year-out.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82260
Nas wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Nas wrote:
Hatchetman wrote:
all this bickering really shows that a coach is only as good as his players.


Players matter but the elite coaches will find a way to be good. Fox is an average coach though. Obviously that's an upgrade over Trestman and Tucker but normally you need more to win.


I don't think he is elite but his production is already beyond average.

I am normally one who advocates for taking a shot at great rather than settling for the known good. I don't think that was the best course of action for the Bears at this time. Unlike others, I think they have the offensive horses to be competitive today. They lacked direction. This hire should change that condition.

I am much more bullish on the Bears for next year than the general public.

If I am wrong, well, everything will be easily disassembled in another couple of years.


I think 81-79 (before Manning) is pretty average. Offensively the Bears still have talent but defensively this team is beyond awful. I think a guy like Fox was the perfect replacement for Lovie. I don't expect Fox to turn our defense into a top 15 unit overnight. That's his expertise.


Your analysis of 81-79 lacks any nuance but we have been through this before.

I say he took over a 1 win team and lead them to a super bowl. You say it was the talent. When those talented teams didn't win it was because of the coaching.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:46 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
good dolphin wrote:

Your analysis of 81-79 lacks any nuance but we have been through this before.

I say he took over a 1 win team and lead them to a super bowl. You say it was the talent. When those talented teams didn't win it was because of the coaching.


He inherited a great young roster in Carolina. They had a draft in 2002 that we could only dream about in Chicago. Every elite player that was on their SB team was there before he arrived. After that success in his 2nd season their drafts sucked and those Carolina teams underachieved in just about every other season. A good to elite coach would never have a 2 win season well into his tenure as head coach. An average coach would.

Denver was different. They had a few pieces before he arrived but they weren't a great team. Peyton Manning's arrival changed that. Every signing or trade was made so the team could "win now". There was no building up the roster. Many of us thought those teams would win a SB. They didn't. You could say Manning was responsible for that but I believe it also falls on the coach.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65801
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Fox really isn't going to matter much. There's waaay too much for the GM to do first.
You get a couple high quality picks and a couple decent free agents and maybe they're competitive. You don't get the picks and they won't be. It's going to take 2-3 years to get this team ready to compete in this division no matter who the coach is.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 3:12 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Darkside wrote:
Fox really isn't going to matter much. There's waaay too much for the GM to do first.
You get a couple high quality picks and a couple decent free agents and maybe they're competitive. You don't get the picks and they won't be. It's going to take 2-3 years to get this team ready to compete in this division no matter who the coach is.


You're right. The Bears need a great draft. If they can do what the Panthers did in 2002 they'll be on their way.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 3:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10795
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
I agree that John Fox is less than perfect. There are holes to question. Given right now, I still think he's the best option.

He will need a lot of help from Pace on draft picks.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 3:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
I'm worried about this Dennis Allen guy as DC. His biggest claim to fame seems to be having worked for Sean Payton.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
Fox was spotted at O'Hare baggage. Surprised Bears didn't send him on Southwest.

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 3:20 pm
Posts: 49
pizza_Place: John's Pizza
So Fox flew in to O'Hare, yesterday, around 1ish? Got to Halas Hall mid-late after noon right? The interview ended around 7ish, flies back out to Denver, only to return sometime again this afternoon to make it official. Does that make any sense?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:47 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102657
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Stupid username.

It might not make sense to us. But he certainly has a home, a family, and maybe even pets back in Dinver that he needed to care of. Its not like you just blink your eyes and boom your moved from one NFL city to another.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13260
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
rogers park bryan wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Fox hasn't done anything over the past 3 years that leads me to believe he is the right guy for this Bears team.
I'd say coaching in the Super Bowl less than one calendar year ago is a good thing.

He took over a 1-15 Carolina team and had them in the Super Bowl two seasons later. That Carolina team had started the year 1-0 then dropped the rest of the games that season. They were the second team in the NFL history to lost 15 in a row.
He also followed a 12-4 season with an 8-8 & then a 2-14. How many "good" coaches have a 2-14 season on their resume?

Jimmy Johnson was 1-15
Good point - although he came into a mess and John fox left one.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 5:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Patrick McNeil wrote:
So Fox flew in to O'Hare, yesterday, around 1ish? Got to Halas Hall mid-late after noon right? The interview ended around 7ish, flies back out to Denver, only to return sometime again this afternoon to make it official. Does that make any sense?


I really don't like your username, fwiw.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 5:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 3:20 pm
Posts: 49
pizza_Place: John's Pizza
Bucky Chris wrote:
Patrick McNeil wrote:
So Fox flew in to O'Hare, yesterday, around 1ish? Got to Halas Hall mid-late after noon right? The interview ended around 7ish, flies back out to Denver, only to return sometime again this afternoon to make it official. Does that make any sense?


I really don't like your username, fwiw.


What's your beef?
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5120
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Nas wrote:
NME wrote:
I always looked at many of those 'talented' players in Carolina as being good fits for the scheme more so than top tier talent. Sure there were a handful of guys that could play on any team and look good like Steve Smith, but those Carolina teams were not as stacked as you're trying to make them out to be Nas.


Also, he rebuilt in Carolina like others have said.


I'm not saying Fox is a terrible coach. I just think he's an average coach. IMO he would have been a good fit to replace Lovie. He would have had the respect of the locker room and would have gotten whatever was left out of that team. They definitely would have made the playoffs in 2013 if he was the coach.

Here are a few of the players he inherited in Carolina:

Julius Peppers
DeShaun Foster
Will Witherspoon
Dante Wesley
Kris Jenkins
John Kasay
Dan Morgan
Muhsin Muhammad
Mike Rucker
Steve Smith
Deon Grant
Jordan Gross

That's a pretty good core to start with IMO.



Dude, there are really only 2 elite players on that list in Peppers and Steve Smith, many of the rest of those guys are a perfect example of what I already said in that they benefitted from the coaching and scheming more than anything else.

And every team has role players, this list doesn't mean much in debating my point.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5120
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
NME wrote:
Also, he rebuilt in Carolina like others have said.
Does he also get credit for blowing that team up?



You misunderstood my post. Nas said Fox isn't a coach you rebuild with, I pointed out that others have mentioned he took over a Carolina team that was in the rebuilding process and did fine.

To your point; I suppose how much credit he would deserve on that front would depend on what his actual influence was on Carolina's drafting as well as bringing in free agents -and I don't have the answer to those questions.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Hatchetman wrote:
I'm worried about this Dennis Allen guy as DC. His biggest claim to fame seems to be having worked for Sean Payton.
Yeah. One year as a DC in Denver and the Allen/Tarver combo in Oakland really looked awful, especially when it came to 2nd half adjustments.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:25 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
NME wrote:
Nas wrote:
NME wrote:
I always looked at many of those 'talented' players in Carolina as being good fits for the scheme more so than top tier talent. Sure there were a handful of guys that could play on any team and look good like Steve Smith, but those Carolina teams were not as stacked as you're trying to make them out to be Nas.


Also, he rebuilt in Carolina like others have said.


I'm not saying Fox is a terrible coach. I just think he's an average coach. IMO he would have been a good fit to replace Lovie. He would have had the respect of the locker room and would have gotten whatever was left out of that team. They definitely would have made the playoffs in 2013 if he was the coach.

Here are a few of the players he inherited in Carolina:

Julius Peppers
DeShaun Foster
Will Witherspoon
Dante Wesley
Kris Jenkins
John Kasay
Dan Morgan
Muhsin Muhammad
Mike Rucker
Steve Smith
Deon Grant
Jordan Gross

That's a pretty good core to start with IMO.



Dude, there are really only 2 elite players on that list in Peppers and Steve Smith, many of the rest of those guys are a perfect example of what I already said in that they benefitted from the coaching and scheming more than anything else.

And every team has role players, this list doesn't mean much in debating my point.


So you don't know most of the players on this list? Just say that next time.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 18493
Location: end of lonely street
pizza_Place: Obbies
Where would the Bears be if the Broncos won? On shit street that's where.

_________________
I'm going to bounce from the spot for awhile but I will be back at some point to argue with you about this hoops stuff again. Playoffs have been great this season. See ya up the road.

I'm out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65801
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Where would the Bears be if the Broncos won? On shit street that's where.

From what I understand, Fox would be quitting... knowing that with Manning on the downslide he knew that Dinver was going to be a turrible place to be coaching for the next several years.
Then again, dude didn't want to coach a loser, or so the narrative goes... what the hell is he doing here?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5120
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Nas wrote:
NME wrote:
Nas wrote:
NME wrote:
I always looked at many of those 'talented' players in Carolina as being good fits for the scheme more so than top tier talent. Sure there were a handful of guys that could play on any team and look good like Steve Smith, but those Carolina teams were not as stacked as you're trying to make them out to be Nas.


Also, he rebuilt in Carolina like others have said.


I'm not saying Fox is a terrible coach. I just think he's an average coach. IMO he would have been a good fit to replace Lovie. He would have had the respect of the locker room and would have gotten whatever was left out of that team. They definitely would have made the playoffs in 2013 if he was the coach.

Here are a few of the players he inherited in Carolina:

Julius Peppers
DeShaun Foster
Will Witherspoon
Dante Wesley
Kris Jenkins
John Kasay
Dan Morgan
Muhsin Muhammad
Mike Rucker
Steve Smith
Deon Grant
Jordan Gross

That's a pretty good core to start with IMO.



Dude, there are really only 2 elite players on that list in Peppers and Steve Smith, many of the rest of those guys are a perfect example of what I already said in that they benefitted from the coaching and scheming more than anything else.

And every team has role players, this list doesn't mean much in debating my point.


So you don't know most of the players on this list? Just say that next time.



It's funny this is your response because after reading your list, I was wondering if you had any idea who most of them were yourself, and I'll be honest here, I'm not sure you do.


I'll give you 1 example: you have DeShaun Foster on your list, the same Deshaun Foster that never once rushed for over 1000 yards.

And Nas, he never even rushed for over 900 yards either. Infact, wanna know his best rushing TD total ever for an entire season?

3.. In back to back seasons no less.

Move over Walter Payton.

Again, anyone can google search a roster from whenever the fuck and toss names up. I get that there are a couple of guys on that list that went to a few pro bowls, but outside of Peppers and Smith that list is meh, at best.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: John Fox
PostPosted: Thu Jan 15, 2015 6:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:33 pm
Posts: 16484
Location: Chicago, Illinois
pizza_Place: Salernos, Oak Park
Hatchetman wrote:
I'm worried about this Dennis Allen guy as DC. His biggest claim to fame seems to be having worked for Sean Payton.


I would much prefer Jim Schwartz as DC.

_________________
CSFMB 2014 Nascar Pick 'em Champion

We don’t have a trillion-dollar debt because we haven’t taxed enough; we have a trillion-dollar debt because we spend too much. — Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 281 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jaw Breaker and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group