It is currently Wed May 21, 2025 11:43 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 409 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13342
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Quinn- will demand more attention than Floyd did, but doesn't provide the ability to cover the field like Floyd did.
Foles- Has played in Nagy's system and is reunited with some coaches he has worked with in the past. He'll be the starting QB.
Graham- Not a fan anymore, but he might be the best option right now.

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 1:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 58065
FrankDrebin wrote:
Graham- Not a fan anymore, but he might be the best option right now.


There is no way he was the best option right now.

Ebron signed with the Steelers today for less money and he is younger. They are pretty much the same player right now.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72600
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RFDC wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
Graham- Not a fan anymore, but he might be the best option right now.


There is no way he was the best option right now.

Ebron signed with the Steelers today for less money and he is younger. They are pretty much the same player right now.

:lol: No they aren't. Eric Ebron is significantly better

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 58065
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
Graham- Not a fan anymore, but he might be the best option right now.


There is no way he was the best option right now.

Ebron signed with the Steelers today for less money and he is younger. They are pretty much the same player right now.

:lol: No they aren't. Eric Ebron is significantly better

I was basing that on production last year. They were pretty similar.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72600
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RFDC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
Graham- Not a fan anymore, but he might be the best option right now.


There is no way he was the best option right now.

Ebron signed with the Steelers today for less money and he is younger. They are pretty much the same player right now.

:lol: No they aren't. Eric Ebron is significantly better

I was basing that on production last year. They were pretty similar.

Now do 2018

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 2:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 58065
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
Graham- Not a fan anymore, but he might be the best option right now.


There is no way he was the best option right now.

Ebron signed with the Steelers today for less money and he is younger. They are pretty much the same player right now.

:lol: No they aren't. Eric Ebron is significantly better

I was basing that on production last year. They were pretty similar.

Now do 2018

TDs were way more...but other than that they were pretty similar

I agree with you in the big picture. Ebron is the better player and the Bears were stupid for signing Graham to a contract for more money

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 2:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13342
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
RFDC wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
Graham- Not a fan anymore, but he might be the best option right now.


There is no way he was the best option right now.

Ebron signed with the Steelers today for less money and he is younger. They are pretty much the same player right now.


Best option on the Bears.

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 3:01 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 39304
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
FavreFan wrote:
RFDC wrote:
FrankDrebin wrote:
Graham- Not a fan anymore, but he might be the best option right now.


There is no way he was the best option right now.

Ebron signed with the Steelers today for less money and he is younger. They are pretty much the same player right now.

:lol: No they aren't. Eric Ebron is significantly better


When he shows up to play.

Which is infrequent at best over his career.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2020 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 83642
Ebron has all sorts of warts in his personality and play. Still, at least there is a chance that he can be great and he was cheaper and he might block once in a while.

Still Ebron has such a low catch percentage, even in his best years, that you have to feed him the ball just to be viable.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2020 6:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:51 am
Posts: 785
Location: Chicago, IL
pizza_Place: Favorite Pizza Place
I think Graham is the better short term play right now. Ebron hasn't really proven much outside of 2018 where Andrew Luck threw for 40 TDs. Ebron would get lost in the mix and wouldn't expect much out of him playing with (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky or even Foles. Graham and Ebron are both bad plays, but for the short term, I would take Graham.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2020 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
I'd be surprised if Quinn doesn't have at least 12 sacks.

:lol:

I love this board


What do you predict sacks to be for Mack and Quinn?

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2020 8:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:51 am
Posts: 785
Location: Chicago, IL
pizza_Place: Favorite Pizza Place
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
I'd be surprised if Quinn doesn't have at least 12 sacks.

:lol:

I love this board


What do you predict sacks to be for Mack and Quinn?


If they both stay healthy and play all 16 games, I would predict 16 for Mack, 10 for Quinn.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2020 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I'm thinking if both play 16 games.

Mack- 17
Quinn-14

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2020 9:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
Graham doesn't block, which is a much bigger deal than anyone seems to realize. Even if he is the same player he was seven years, which he clearly is not, that version of Jimmy Graham is not as valuable now as it was then. He does not to help the run game.

It was a terrible signing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2020 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
PortageP_Chi wrote:
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
I'd be surprised if Quinn doesn't have at least 12 sacks.

:lol:

I love this board


What do you predict sacks to be for Mack and Quinn?


If they both stay healthy and play all 16 games, I would predict 16 for Mack, 10 for Quinn.


I hated Floyd so much, dude was virtually useless. He was in the best position to look good and was unable. I hated the " he's good in coverage" horseshit almost as much, every team that played the bears got rid of the ball so quickly it wasn't much to ask to cover a guy for 5 yards when you give him a 3 yard cushion. Mack impacts the game so many ways that never show up on a stat sheet..watch a competent defender clean up playing on the other side of him.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2020 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:51 am
Posts: 785
Location: Chicago, IL
pizza_Place: Favorite Pizza Place
312player wrote:
PortageP_Chi wrote:
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
I'd be surprised if Quinn doesn't have at least 12 sacks.

:lol:

I love this board


What do you predict sacks to be for Mack and Quinn?


If they both stay healthy and play all 16 games, I would predict 16 for Mack, 10 for Quinn.


I hated Floyd so much, dude was virtually useless. He was in the best position to look good and was unable. I hated the " he's good in coverage" horseshit almost as much, every team that played the bears got rid of the ball so quickly it wasn't much to ask to cover a guy for 5 yards when you give him a 3 yard cushion. Mack impacts the game so many ways that never show up on a stat sheet..watch a competent defender clean up playing on the other side of him.


Not saying its directly related, but notice how Macks stats in his first year here in 2018, and first half of the season in 2019, took a huge drop especially in sacks when Akiem Hicks was injured in the 2nd half of 2019.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2020 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Hicks is a hell of a player, last year Mack was game planned against every week.. they ran away from him or rolled out the other way, they did mostly 3 step drops.. adding Quinn is going to change everything. A healthy Hicks puts us the best D in the NFL.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2020 12:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 15189
pizza_Place: Grazianos
PortageP_Chi wrote:
312player wrote:
PortageP_Chi wrote:
312player wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
312player wrote:
I'd be surprised if Quinn doesn't have at least 12 sacks.

:lol:

I love this board


What do you predict sacks to be for Mack and Quinn?


If they both stay healthy and play all 16 games, I would predict 16 for Mack, 10 for Quinn.


I hated Floyd so much, dude was virtually useless. He was in the best position to look good and was unable. I hated the " he's good in coverage" horseshit almost as much, every team that played the bears got rid of the ball so quickly it wasn't much to ask to cover a guy for 5 yards when you give him a 3 yard cushion. Mack impacts the game so many ways that never show up on a stat sheet..watch a competent defender clean up playing on the other side of him.


Not saying its directly related, but notice how Macks stats in his first year here in 2018, and first half of the season in 2019, took a huge drop especially in sacks when Akiem Hicks was injured in the 2nd half of 2019.


Thats absolutely true about Hicks. When they lost him, they were able to double and sometimes triple team Mack. Just getting back a healthy Hicks will mean a lot to the Bear's defense. I still worry about the defensive backfield. Dix gets slammed a lot but he is a good db and they need to find someone somewhere to fill his spot.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2020 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72600
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
312player wrote:
I'm thinking if both play 16 games.

Mack- 17
Quinn-14

:lol:

I’ll say

Mack - 12
Quinn - 8

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2020 5:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
FF is probably about right. Mack simply isn't the player he was in 2018 anymore and Quinn is one of the most obvious "fall of a cliff" candidates in the whole NFL. But, the Bears still boast one of the best coverage units in the league so someone will pick up a few sacks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 6:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:51 am
Posts: 785
Location: Chicago, IL
pizza_Place: Favorite Pizza Place
Antarctica wrote:
FF is probably about right. Mack simply isn't the player he was in 2018 anymore and Quinn is one of the most obvious "fall of a cliff" candidates in the whole NFL. But, the Bears still boast one of the best coverage units in the league so someone will pick up a few sacks.


I think Mack rebounds this year and has another 15+ sack pro bowl season. If Mack and Hicks stay healthy all year, Quinn will be average at worst.... or he could put up numbers similar to Mack. It would be hard for Quinn to "fall of a cliff" as you say while playing in this defense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 6:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 11485
pizza_Place: Dino's
Not really. Quinn had big sack numbers in a contract year.

_________________
Sex isn't dirty, sex isn't a crime. It's a loving act between two or more consenting adults.

-Hank Kingsley


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 7:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:51 am
Posts: 785
Location: Chicago, IL
pizza_Place: Favorite Pizza Place
Furious Styles wrote:
Not really. Quinn had big sack numbers in a contract year.


Yes.... he had 12 sacks in 14 games last year. While I would not expect him to duplicate that rate this year, I still think he will be productive. If he plays all 16 games, 10-12 sacks is realistic.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 8:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4391
pizza_Place: Lino's
Most of the Quinn sacks look to be on outside speed rushes teams will not be able to slide protection or put a TE on his side with Mack playing opposite. This should really open opportunities inside for games and LB/S blitzers should be able to come free, hopefully Pagano will be creative this year. Too bad there isn't cap room to bring in an interior guy like Suh to rush from the inside on passing downs. However, it all gets down to the offenses ability to at least put together longer drives which will keep the rapidly aging D fresh and allow Quinn and Mack to put up 8-10 sacks each.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 8:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:36 pm
Posts: 6715
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
None of this matters if Charles Leno and Bobbie Massie are starting at the tackles.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2020 10:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 83642
I expect 20-25 combined sacks from them. But they will also cause an increase of sack numbers from the dt group

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 11036
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Antarctica wrote:
None of this matters if Charles Leno and Bobbie Massie are starting at the tackles.

yep. This has been my position all off-season. it looks like the Bears have done everything in their power to ensure those 2 turnstyles remain starters. woof.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2020 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Pace fucked us, he restructured leno deal last year and gave Massie a 4 year year deal last season.. I think both will be a bit better this year but neither deserved new deals.. we we're stuck with these guys.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2020 11:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 15189
pizza_Place: Grazianos
BigW72 wrote:
Antarctica wrote:
None of this matters if Charles Leno and Bobbie Massie are starting at the tackles.

yep. This has been my position all off-season. it looks like the Bears have done everything in their power to ensure those 2 turnstyles remain starters. woof.


YOu guys are absolutely right. Pace and the Bears really screwed the Bears and their offense with those contracts they gave to two worthless tubs of goo. I wonder what if any input Nagy had on those two decisions?

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2020 11:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11336
pizza_Place: Depends
Clawmaster wrote:
Most of the Quinn sacks look to be on outside speed rushes teams will not be able to slide protection or put a TE on his side with Mack playing opposite. This should really open opportunities inside for games and LB/S blitzers should be able to come free, hopefully Pagano will be creative this year. Too bad there isn't cap room to bring in an interior guy like Suh to rush from the inside on passing downs. However, it all gets down to the offenses ability to at least put together longer drives which will keep the rapidly aging D fresh and allow Quinn and Mack to put up 8-10 sacks each.


hicks averaged 7.5 sacks during his first 3 years with the bears. as long as all these 30+ year old defenders stay on the field the defense will be elite! and we all know having to significantly rely on 30+ year old NFL players always ends well !


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 409 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group