It is currently Tue Nov 12, 2024 7:22 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 266 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2022 6:36 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Officially eliminated from the playoffs before their bye, lol. Might be a first in NFL history.

Also lost their title of most wins in NFL history, now owned by Packers.


That was a great stat. They've had the most wins every year until this season.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2022 6:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41373
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Officially eliminated from the playoffs before their bye, lol. Might be a first in NFL history.

Also lost their title of most wins in NFL history, now owned by Packers.


Is there a worse coach in football than Eberlose? No wonder this is a dead ass team, look at him on the sideline! He just stands there emotionless. Why didn't we hire Daboll?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2022 8:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7292
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Caller Bob wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Officially eliminated from the playoffs before their bye, lol. Might be a first in NFL history.

Also lost their title of most wins in NFL history, now owned by Packers.


Is there a worse coach in football than Eberlose? No wonder this is a dead ass team, look at him on the sideline! He just stands there emotionless. Why didn't we hire Daboll?

All is not rosy when it comes to Daboll recently. I’m not down on him too bad because of the roster he has to work with but this giants fan is starting to scratch my head on some in-game decisions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2022 10:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
I thought it was a good game a higher draft pick outcome

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2022 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Fields looked good too. The guy is gonna be a winner.

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Sun Dec 04, 2022 10:17 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38232
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
man of few opinions wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Jaw Breaker wrote:
Officially eliminated from the playoffs before their bye, lol. Might be a first in NFL history.

Also lost their title of most wins in NFL history, now owned by Packers.


Is there a worse coach in football than Eberlose? No wonder this is a dead ass team, look at him on the sideline! He just stands there emotionless. Why didn't we hire Daboll?

All is not rosy when it comes to Daboll recently. I’m not down on him too bad because of the roster he has to work with but this giants fan is starting to scratch my head on some in-game decisions.


He runs six different plays out of about six different sets.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 6:51 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4031
pizza_Place: Lino's
Does seem that there was some type of discussion, likely from Poles, to limit the QB run plays because there were very few called QB runs.

Bad teams find a way to lose, but the Pack looked like they were ready to tap out until the Claypool fumble, that completely changed momentum and is the type of play bad teams make on the road to a top five draft pick.

Did like seeing Fields make the D pay for stacking the box by hitting a couple long throws, but then they got away from the run, so it didn't make any difference, not sure why Getsy just doesn't keep feeding Montgomery when the run game gets into a rhythm?

When teams need to get the running game going, they run right at #55, he looks like a safety playing DE and either vacates his gap by jumping inside to avoid getting bitch slapped by a OT, TE, or FB, or gets blown out of his gap by a OT, TE, or RB.

Could plainly see Eberflus saying, "what happened", after the blocked FG, well it was evident to anyone watching the game, the kicker tried to drive the ball low because the wind was altering kicks making any FG over 30 yards problematic. He still has a lot to learn about kicking in Soldier Field, the guy is really scuffling here in the second half of the season with game management.

Were still on track to trade down and get Jalen Carter while picking up extra picks, they are likely right on target for what Poles wants out of the season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:08 am
Posts: 7152
Location: Section 433
pizza_Place: 1. Homemade 2. Jewels
FrankDrebin wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Chicago_Bears_season

"Owner- Aaron Rodgers"

:lol: :evil:


Image

_________________
"I honestly don't see a good bet on the board here."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 8:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 31495
pizza_Place: What??
That's awesome.

_________________
Wattabout Kodak Black?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 9:56 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
I'm bothered by Fields throwing St. Brown under the bus. Yes, St. Brown could have made a better attempt to come back to the ball or become a defender. He doesn't have the cachet as a passer to throw anyone under the bus. Claypool didn't complain about Fields not throwing him the ball when he was open in the end zone for like the 3rd time. Other receivers aren't complaining about Fields repeatedly overthrowing them by 10 yards. STFU and be a leader.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 10:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
I'm more interested in Alexander on the Packers throwing Brown under the bus, also called him a scrub as well. Damn, that's cold.

I agree with you on Fields.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 10:08 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
veganfan21 wrote:
I'm more interested in Alexander on the Packers throwing Brown under the bus, also called him a scrub as well. Damn, that's cold.

I agree with you on Fields.


Yeah, that did sound personal.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Nas wrote:
I'm bothered by Fields throwing St. Brown under the bus. Yes, St. Brown could have made a better attempt to come back to the ball or become a defender. He doesn't have the cachet as a passer to throw anyone under the bus. Claypool didn't complain about Fields not throwing him the ball when he was open in the end zone for like the 3rd time. Other receivers aren't complaining about Fields repeatedly overthrowing them by 10 yards. STFU and be a leader.


i needed a Claypool score to hit on a pretty crazy parlay (i know )


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 11:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 3:49 pm
Posts: 4491
pizza_Place: Rosati's
veganfan21 wrote:
I'm more interested in Alexander on the Packers throwing Brown under the bus, also called him a scrub as well. Damn, that's cold.




Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
10 second clips


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 12:11 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Waddle blames St. Brown and Fields. He said Fields stared down St. Brown and should have seen Alexander was sitting on that route. He also blames St. Brown for kinda going through the motions on the route. He didn't sell to Alexander that he was doing anything except for running a "9" route.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30277
Jaire should shut his mouth, he has been terrible all year.

Go Pack!!!

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57185
Nas wrote:
Waddle blames St. Brown and Fields. He said Fields stared down St. Brown and should have seen Alexander was sitting on that route. He also blames St. Brown for kinda going through the motions on the route. He didn't sell to Alexander that he was doing anything except for running a "9" route.

That is probably fair. There is blame on both sides, but St Brown has to be quicker on that.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 12:44 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:17 pm
Posts: 102656
pizza_Place: Vito & Nick's
Nas wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
It’s kind of a damn shame that this team is so devoid of talent. They’re playing above their heads for each other.

Next season should be intriguing.
That's coaching.
YUP
+1
Right.

The secondary yesterday was largely scrap heap and practice squad guys, some of whom were making their NFL debut against a surefire HOF QB. Teams have feasted on the Bears defensive backs this at different times this season, yet there seemed to be a good gameplan in place and the defensive backfield held their own for the most part despite having to cover guys for 4-5-8 seconds per play since there was absolutely zero pass rush.

But yeah, lets fire the coach who clearly helped those kids play well yesterday :lol: :lol:

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It's more fun to be a victim
Caller Bob wrote:
There will never be an effective vaccine. I'll never get one anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 12:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:11 pm
Posts: 3611
Location: Home of Dick Tracy Days
pizza_Place: Georgio's--Crystal Lake
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
It’s kind of a damn shame that this team is so devoid of talent. They’re playing above their heads for each other.

Next season should be intriguing.
That's coaching.
YUP
+1
Right.

The secondary yesterday was largely scrap heap and practice squad guys, some of whom were making their NFL debut against a surefire HOF QB. Teams have feasted on the Bears defensive backs this at different times this season, yet there seemed to be a good gameplan in place and the defensive backfield held their own for the most part despite having to cover guys for 4-5-8 seconds per play since there was absolutely zero pass rush.

But yeah, lets fire the coach who clearly helped those kids play well yesterday :lol: :lol:


It makes you wonder about whether or not the staff believes the Cover-2 is the model going forward, or if that's what their doing based on the talent they have.

_________________
An unjust law is no law at all--St. Augustine of Hippo

Cause tried and true
I see the light in you
Oh, can you dig in my soul?
Could you smell my whole...
life?--Gener and Deaner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 12:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57185
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
It’s kind of a damn shame that this team is so devoid of talent. They’re playing above their heads for each other.

Next season should be intriguing.
That's coaching.
YUP
+1
Right.

The secondary yesterday was largely scrap heap and practice squad guys, some of whom were making their NFL debut against a surefire HOF QB. Teams have feasted on the Bears defensive backs this at different times this season, yet there seemed to be a good gameplan in place and the defensive backfield held their own for the most part despite having to cover guys for 4-5-8 seconds per play since there was absolutely zero pass rush.

But yeah, lets fire the coach who clearly helped those kids play well yesterday :lol: :lol:

:lol: hard to argue.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41373
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Harvard Dan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:
Nas wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
It’s kind of a damn shame that this team is so devoid of talent. They’re playing above their heads for each other.

Next season should be intriguing.
That's coaching.
YUP
+1
Right.

The secondary yesterday was largely scrap heap and practice squad guys, some of whom were making their NFL debut against a surefire HOF QB. Teams have feasted on the Bears defensive backs this at different times this season, yet there seemed to be a good gameplan in place and the defensive backfield held their own for the most part despite having to cover guys for 4-5-8 seconds per play since there was absolutely zero pass rush.

But yeah, lets fire the coach who clearly helped those kids play well yesterday :lol: :lol:


It makes you wonder about whether or not the staff believes the Cover-2 is the model going forward, or if that's what their doing based on the talent they have.


The "Tampa Terrible" aka "Cover-Who" defense hasn't been relevant in the NFL in over a decade. They need to shit can the entire scheme. I would love to seem them hire Gym Shorts as the defensive coordinator for next season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6836
Nas wrote:
I'm bothered by Fields throwing St. Brown under the bus. Yes, St. Brown could have made a better attempt to come back to the ball or become a defender. He doesn't have the cachet as a passer to throw anyone under the bus. Claypool didn't complain about Fields not throwing him the ball when he was open in the end zone for like the 3rd time. Other receivers aren't complaining about Fields repeatedly overthrowing them by 10 yards. STFU and be a leader.


I have no issues with Fields holding others to a higher standard. They probably ran that play all week and St. Brown dogged it on that play to lose the game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:19 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Nas wrote:
Waddle blames St. Brown and Fields. He said Fields stared down St. Brown and should have seen Alexander was sitting on that route. He also blames St. Brown for kinda going through the motions on the route. He didn't sell to Alexander that he was doing anything except for running a "9" route.


He was incredibly slow in breaking back to the ball, which consequently would have been intercepted regardless of what Fields was doing. Is there video showing Fields "stare down" of St. Brown?

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:21 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Juiced wrote:
Nas wrote:
I'm bothered by Fields throwing St. Brown under the bus. Yes, St. Brown could have made a better attempt to come back to the ball or become a defender. He doesn't have the cachet as a passer to throw anyone under the bus. Claypool didn't complain about Fields not throwing him the ball when he was open in the end zone for like the 3rd time. Other receivers aren't complaining about Fields repeatedly overthrowing them by 10 yards. STFU and be a leader.


I have no issues with Fields holding others to a higher standard. They probably ran that play all week and St. Brown dogged it on that play to lose the game.


I don't have an issue with Fields' comments either. It's becoming clear that he has taken over the locker room, and I've heard that his teammates have a lot of respect for him due to his work ethic, toughness, unselfish attitude, and talent.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41373
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
I would love to literally throw ESB under a bus, then kidnap his brother and throw a Bears jersey on him, seriously, all the good sperm went to the younger sibling



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41373
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
And Packer Fan Seacrest RAVED about ESB's blocking :lol: :lol: :lol:




Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 7:11 pm
Posts: 3611
Location: Home of Dick Tracy Days
pizza_Place: Georgio's--Crystal Lake
Caller Bob wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:

But yeah, lets fire the coach who clearly helped those kids play well yesterday :lol: :lol:


It makes you wonder about whether or not the staff believes the Cover-2 is the model going forward, or if that's what their doing based on the talent they have.


The "Tampa Terrible" aka "Cover-Who" defense hasn't been relevant in the NFL in over a decade. They need to shit can the entire scheme. I would love to seem them hire Gym Shorts as the defensive coordinator for next season.


I'm not debating the irrelevancy of the Tampa-2 Bob. I'm saying it's being used because it is seen by the current staff as the best way NOT to get torched worse than they have been based on the talent pool.

_________________
An unjust law is no law at all--St. Augustine of Hippo

Cause tried and true
I see the light in you
Oh, can you dig in my soul?
Could you smell my whole...
life?--Gener and Deaner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41373
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Harvard Dan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:

But yeah, lets fire the coach who clearly helped those kids play well yesterday :lol: :lol:


It makes you wonder about whether or not the staff believes the Cover-2 is the model going forward, or if that's what their doing based on the talent they have.


The "Tampa Terrible" aka "Cover-Who" defense hasn't been relevant in the NFL in over a decade. They need to shit can the entire scheme. I would love to seem them hire Gym Shorts as the defensive coordinator for next season.


I'm not debating the irrelevancy of the Tampa-2 Bob. I'm saying it's being used because it is seen by the current staff as the best way NOT to get torched worse than they have been based on the talent pool.


At 25.6 PPG (it's even worse when you break down the numbers after the trade deadline) they are already getting torched, playing this stupid scheme. If they kept the 3-4 in place, I'd hazard a guess they would be at least a bit better, even if they still traded Roquan, Quinn, etc. I know Jaylon Johnson has been way worse in this defense.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Packers @ Bears
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 1:28 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Harvard Dan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Harvard Dan wrote:
Frank Coztansa wrote:

But yeah, lets fire the coach who clearly helped those kids play well yesterday :lol: :lol:


It makes you wonder about whether or not the staff believes the Cover-2 is the model going forward, or if that's what their doing based on the talent they have.


The "Tampa Terrible" aka "Cover-Who" defense hasn't been relevant in the NFL in over a decade. They need to shit can the entire scheme. I would love to seem them hire Gym Shorts as the defensive coordinator for next season.


I'm not debating the irrelevancy of the Tampa-2 Bob. I'm saying it's being used because it is seen by the current staff as the best way NOT to get torched worse than they have been based on the talent pool.


Eberflus ran the Cover 2 in Indy with substantially more talent.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 266 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jaw Breaker and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group