It is currently Mon Mar 31, 2025 5:42 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 10:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 94176
Location: To the left of my post
City of Fools wrote:
Brick wrote:
Would have been nice if Poles hadn't stupidly accepted a 6th round pick for Fields instead of the 4th. But Justin Fields feelings were too important.

this is the first I've heard this. What idiotic team was willing to give a fourth for Fields?

The Steelers were willing to give it up if he played 50% of the snaps. Tell them that is the deal or the Bears wait it out. They could easily have gotten a 6th round pick any time up until the trade deadline. Trey Lance was traded for a 4th round pick.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 10:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5457
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
City of Fools wrote:
Brick wrote:
Would have been nice if Poles hadn't stupidly accepted a 6th round pick for Fields instead of the 4th. But Justin Fields feelings were too important.

this is the first I've heard this. What idiotic team was willing to give a fourth for Fields?




They were approached about it at the combine that year. Allegedly there were a couple of teams interested in trading for him including one team that was willing to go even higher than a 4th but Ryan wanted to send Justin to where he wanted to go which limited their options.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 10:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5457
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Clawmaster wrote:
Ben Johnson saw what anyone that knows anything about football saw last season, the interior of the oline was terrible and contributed significantly to the lack of offensive production.

Realize that many on the board do not think offensive line play matters, but interior pressure kills an offense, how many times did you see the Bears center or guards look totally confused or get blown up on a play last year. You also had your rookie QB making wrong line calls, you saw how he would take an extra second to try to figure out protections, Ryan Poles might be one of the dumbest guys in the NFL, you do not put all that on your rookie QB's plate, he might be able to figure it out a few years into his career, but not right away, he basically pissed away a year on his rookie QB window.

However, this all gets back to brutal Ryan Poles drafts which have severe consequences the following seasons as you have to trade away draft picks and blow cap space to paper over idiotic draft picks like Velus Jones.

One has to hope that Johnson is telling Poles to make these moves, if these moves work out it will make you wonder why they are keeping Ryan Poles around, if your HC has to tell your GM exactly what to do, do you really need a GM.





Many of us here know offensive line play matters -how you go about getting there is where the disagreement comes in.


I don’t like the idea of giving up picks for players that are most likely going to get cut anyway -and then paying them which limits you in both FA and the draft simultaneously. I especially don’t like doing this with players that are often hurt or are in their 30’s. That’s not how you build for the future, it’s a bandage at best.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 26028
pizza_Place: Pizanos
I’d still like to see both lines prioritized throughout the early rounds.

There’s a good amount of RB depth in the draft if they really feel compelled to go there after the 3rd round.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
“We’ll just wait until a bad thing happens to worry about something.”


Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72594
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
He isn't past his prime, he was first team All Pro last year and the only OL to receive OPOY votes.

The Jonah Jackson trade was fair to criticize as Poles doing his same old shit. This move is basically impossible to criticize, its a home run for the bears.




Playing well and still being in ones prime are not mutually exclusive. Especially in a game like football where performance can and often does drop off a cliff at a certain point.


This is still in line with Poles doing his same old shit. There’s a good chance Thuney gets released if a trade couldn’t be worked out for him. Poles continues to get pantsed in deals like this because he’s afraid to compete for FA’s and he’s afraid of the draft.


And this is why he should have been launched at seasons end and the coach and GM should have been lined up. Poles has changed nothing and learned nothing, he’s the same idiot that drafted Velus Jones and kept him too long, same idiot that traded away a 2nd round pick that wound up becoming a 1st round pick for a nobody WR that was about to get launched, and the same guy that obsessed over a perpetually injured back up O-lineman for years on end in Bates who was also about to touch grass before Poles traded for him.


Obviously I hope for the best, but I’m still going to call it for what it is -it’s a waste of resources and a reflection of can kicking incompetence on his end. Plain and simple.


Poles is who I thought he was.

I think Poles has mostly done a bad job in his tenure but the underlined part is just plainly not true. You don't understand how good Thuney still is.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 12:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 11:26 am
Posts: 15126
pizza_Place: Grazianos
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’d still like to see both lines prioritized throughout the early rounds.

There’s a good amount of RB depth in the draft if they really feel compelled to go there after the 3rd round.


My opinion is that Jeanty is a once in a decade game changing offensive player and the Bear's must get him in the first round even if they have to move up to get him.

_________________
An Ode to the Texas man who shot an Antifa terrorist:

Oh, he might have went on livin'
But he made one fatal slip
When he tried to match the Ranger
With the big iron on his hip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32232
pizza_Place: Milano's
The Hawk wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I’d still like to see both lines prioritized throughout the early rounds.

There’s a good amount of RB depth in the draft if they really feel compelled to go there after the 3rd round.


My opinion is that Jeanty is a once in a decade game changing offensive player and the Bear's must get him in the first round even if they have to move up to get him.


yea move up to get a RB , sounds good .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:46 pm
Posts: 10292
pizza_Place: Q's Hillside
With these moves, their priority for the first two rounds should be DL/LT or DL/DL.

_________________
"When people want their version of the truth, they go find it, no matter how baseless their beliefs." -- Ken Rosenthal


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 12:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7136
NME wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Ben Johnson saw what anyone that knows anything about football saw last season, the interior of the oline was terrible and contributed significantly to the lack of offensive production.

Realize that many on the board do not think offensive line play matters, but interior pressure kills an offense, how many times did you see the Bears center or guards look totally confused or get blown up on a play last year. You also had your rookie QB making wrong line calls, you saw how he would take an extra second to try to figure out protections, Ryan Poles might be one of the dumbest guys in the NFL, you do not put all that on your rookie QB's plate, he might be able to figure it out a few years into his career, but not right away, he basically pissed away a year on his rookie QB window.

However, this all gets back to brutal Ryan Poles drafts which have severe consequences the following seasons as you have to trade away draft picks and blow cap space to paper over idiotic draft picks like Velus Jones.

One has to hope that Johnson is telling Poles to make these moves, if these moves work out it will make you wonder why they are keeping Ryan Poles around, if your HC has to tell your GM exactly what to do, do you really need a GM.


Many of us here know offensive line play matters -how you go about getting there is where the disagreement comes in.


I don’t like the idea of giving up picks for players that are most likely going to get cut anyway -and then paying them which limits you in both FA and the draft simultaneously. I especially don’t like doing this with players that are often hurt or are in their 30’s. That’s not how you build for the future, it’s a bandage at best.


I agree with this take. The Poles era should have been done with Eberflus. These latest moves are just band-aids over a gushing fountain of blood, spraying the walls of Halas Hall.

Leaving Poles in charge of this mess is like having Jason Vorhees in charge of the company picnic.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 10983
Location: Parrish, FL
pizza_Place: 1. Peaquods 2. Aurelios
Juiced wrote:
NME wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Ben Johnson saw what anyone that knows anything about football saw last season, the interior of the oline was terrible and contributed significantly to the lack of offensive production.

Realize that many on the board do not think offensive line play matters, but interior pressure kills an offense, how many times did you see the Bears center or guards look totally confused or get blown up on a play last year. You also had your rookie QB making wrong line calls, you saw how he would take an extra second to try to figure out protections, Ryan Poles might be one of the dumbest guys in the NFL, you do not put all that on your rookie QB's plate, he might be able to figure it out a few years into his career, but not right away, he basically pissed away a year on his rookie QB window.

However, this all gets back to brutal Ryan Poles drafts which have severe consequences the following seasons as you have to trade away draft picks and blow cap space to paper over idiotic draft picks like Velus Jones.

One has to hope that Johnson is telling Poles to make these moves, if these moves work out it will make you wonder why they are keeping Ryan Poles around, if your HC has to tell your GM exactly what to do, do you really need a GM.


Many of us here know offensive line play matters -how you go about getting there is where the disagreement comes in.


I don’t like the idea of giving up picks for players that are most likely going to get cut anyway -and then paying them which limits you in both FA and the draft simultaneously. I especially don’t like doing this with players that are often hurt or are in their 30’s. That’s not how you build for the future, it’s a bandage at best.


I agree with this take. The Poles era should have been done with Eberflus. These latest moves are just band-aids over a gushing fountain of blood, spraying the walls of Halas Hall.

Leaving Poles in charge of this mess is like having Jason Vorhees in charge of the company picnic.

I agree Poles should have been launched with Eberflus, but it's the Bears. We've seen 2 moves that directly address a major problem with the roster. One of them is a certifiable good move, we'll see how Jackson plays out...my guess he nets more value than a 6th round pick. Maybe Poles gets to stay and has been neutered in terms of authority given to Ben Johnson. We will find out soon enough.

_________________
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
brick (/brik/) verb
1. block or enclose with a wall of bricks
2. Proper response would be to ask an endless series of follow ups until the person regrets having spoken to you in the first place.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 1:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5457
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
FavreFan wrote:
I think Poles has mostly done a bad job in his tenure but the underlined part is just plainly not true. You don't understand how good Thuney still is.




It has nothing to do with how good he’s been up until this point -it’s a numbers game and KC has to cut cost somewhere and I’m betting he’d have been the odd man out if they couldn’t work out a trade. He’s 32 and despite his play I’d be willing to bet they were looking at his age and the odds of his play continuing to sustain that All Pro level.. it’s just not realistic to think he’ll do it for years to come Vs a guy like Tre Smith who is 25.


My criticism isn’t of how good he is, my criticism is of his age Vs sustainable success. The Bears have a young 1st year head coach, a young QB headed into his 2nd year and 3 top 50 picks in a draft deep with interior OL talent.. build for the future. Trading for a 32 year old isn’t doing that it’s kicking the can down the road yet again.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15209
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
I'm hoping he's John Tait-ish for two seasons. Tait was a tackle but he signed from the Chiefs when he was 30. Played five years more.

And yes, this is all doomed to failure because they didn't get rid of Poles. But they could be decent for a few years before they can't sign Williams again.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72594
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I think Poles has mostly done a bad job in his tenure but the underlined part is just plainly not true. You don't understand how good Thuney still is.




It has nothing to do with how good he’s been up until this point -it’s a numbers game and KC has to cut cost somewhere and I’m betting he’d have been the odd man out if they couldn’t work out a trade.

Someone would have traded for him if the Bears didn't. Maybe they get a 5th instead of a 4th. Teams don't cut 1st team All Pro guys. I can't remember it ever happening.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 3:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2460
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
FavreFan wrote:
I think Poles has mostly done a bad job in his tenure but the underlined part is just plainly not true. You don't understand how good Thuney still is.

He did not finish strong. That could be because they moved him to left tackle, that could be because he’s declining, it could be both. I’m a little wary that nobody beat this deal from the Bears, but I can explain that by reading between the lines I’m sure he wanted new money and was willing to hold out to get it.

It’ll be hard for this to go down as a bad trade. But it will be just as hard for the inevitable contract to not be a bad one too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 3:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2460
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
FavreFan wrote:
Someone would have traded for him if the Bears didn't. Maybe they get a 5th instead of a 4th. Teams don't cut 1st team All Pro guys. I can't remember it ever happening.

John Sullivan from the Vikings got cut after making first team All-Pro.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 4:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11242
pizza_Place: Depends
FavreFan wrote:
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I think Poles has mostly done a bad job in his tenure but the underlined part is just plainly not true. You don't understand how good Thuney still is.




It has nothing to do with how good he’s been up until this point -it’s a numbers game and KC has to cut cost somewhere and I’m betting he’d have been the odd man out if they couldn’t work out a trade.

Someone would have traded for him if the Bears didn't. Maybe they get a 5th instead of a 4th. Teams don't cut 1st team All Pro guys. I can't remember it ever happening.


they just lost a superbowl because their line couldnt block 4. why did they trade an all pro off a line that wasnt good enough to begin with? they must think he's going to decline and it was time to sell high


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72594
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
USA wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I think Poles has mostly done a bad job in his tenure but the underlined part is just plainly not true. You don't understand how good Thuney still is.

He did not finish strong. That could be because they moved him to left tackle, that could be because he’s declining, it could be both. I’m a little wary that nobody beat this deal from the Bears, but I can explain that by reading between the lines I’m sure he wanted new money and was willing to hold out to get it.

It’ll be hard for this to go down as a bad trade. But it will be just as hard for the inevitable contract to not be a bad one too.

I think it's pretty obvious it's because he was playing LT out of position. He even held up fairly well in that spot except against Texans and Eagles, two of the best DLs in the league.

USA wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Someone would have traded for him if the Bears didn't. Maybe they get a 5th instead of a 4th. Teams don't cut 1st team All Pro guys. I can't remember it ever happening.

John Sullivan from the Vikings got cut after making first team All-Pro.

Fair point but Sullivan was hurt when he got cut, Thuney is not. Regardless, reports are already out there that other teams were interested in trading for him, so I think we can confidently put to bed the "would have gotten released" thing.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 5:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72594
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
billypootons wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I think Poles has mostly done a bad job in his tenure but the underlined part is just plainly not true. You don't understand how good Thuney still is.




It has nothing to do with how good he’s been up until this point -it’s a numbers game and KC has to cut cost somewhere and I’m betting he’d have been the odd man out if they couldn’t work out a trade.

Someone would have traded for him if the Bears didn't. Maybe they get a 5th instead of a 4th. Teams don't cut 1st team All Pro guys. I can't remember it ever happening.


they just lost a superbowl because their line couldnt block 4. why did they trade an all pro off a line that wasnt good enough to begin with? they must think he's going to decline and it was time to sell high

They are paying their center and other guard top of the market money already. They have a backup guard they supposedly like to step in. They very badly need a LT, seemingly are trying to redirect resources to that. It makes sense to me why the Chiefs felt they couldn't afford him and why the Bears can.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 5:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5457
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
FavreFan wrote:
Someone would have traded for him if the Bears didn't. Maybe they get a 5th instead of a 4th. Teams don't cut 1st team All Pro guys. I can't remember it ever happening.





I’d say mostly because it’s not common that they’re 32 years old rostered on a perennial Super Bowl contender that has too many mouths to feed. Doesn’t mean it wouldn’t have happened this time.


And I know you understand my overall point of why this falls into ‘typical Poles shit’ behavior along with the Jackson move.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 7:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2019 7:06 pm
Posts: 4391
pizza_Place: Lino's
NME wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:
Ben Johnson saw what anyone that knows anything about football saw last season, the interior of the oline was terrible and contributed significantly to the lack of offensive production.

Realize that many on the board do not think offensive line play matters, but interior pressure kills an offense, how many times did you see the Bears center or guards look totally confused or get blown up on a play last year. You also had your rookie QB making wrong line calls, you saw how he would take an extra second to try to figure out protections, Ryan Poles might be one of the dumbest guys in the NFL, you do not put all that on your rookie QB's plate, he might be able to figure it out a few years into his career, but not right away, he basically pissed away a year on his rookie QB window.

However, this all gets back to brutal Ryan Poles drafts which have severe consequences the following seasons as you have to trade away draft picks and blow cap space to paper over idiotic draft picks like Velus Jones.

One has to hope that Johnson is telling Poles to make these moves, if these moves work out it will make you wonder why they are keeping Ryan Poles around, if your HC has to tell your GM exactly what to do, do you really need a GM.





Many of us here know offensive line play matters -how you go about getting there is where the disagreement comes in.


I don’t like the idea of giving up picks for players that are most likely going to get cut anyway -and then paying them which limits you in both FA and the draft simultaneously. I especially don’t like doing this with players that are often hurt or are in their 30’s. That’s not how you build for the future, it’s a bandage at best.


You can find chats here where posters express disdain for watching and valuing offensive line play, but that's not why you called.

See this as more of a move to bring in vets who are smart enough to pick up blitzes and line stunts, expect teams to blitz Caleb early and often to see if he has learned how to read and react, having a few vets, especially one that knows Johnson's system is a smart move to aid the progression of your potential QB1. You will get a much better evaluation on Caleb with guys you know are competent on the interior and it will help your running game as well.

Another factor is the lack of quality offensive lineman available in free agency, you would have to overpay for these guys on the open market, they will still have to overpay for a center, but you then have upgrades at all three positions on the interior of your line, a competent RT, and still a huge hole at LT.

Wondering if they take a LT at #10, and go D line with the two second round picks, but would not be surprised if they take a RB with one of the second round picks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 7:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2460
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
FavreFan wrote:
USA wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I think Poles has mostly done a bad job in his tenure but the underlined part is just plainly not true. You don't understand how good Thuney still is.

He did not finish strong. That could be because they moved him to left tackle, that could be because he’s declining, it could be both. I’m a little wary that nobody beat this deal from the Bears, but I can explain that by reading between the lines I’m sure he wanted new money and was willing to hold out to get it.

It’ll be hard for this to go down as a bad trade. But it will be just as hard for the inevitable contract to not be a bad one too.

I think it's pretty obvious it's because he was playing LT out of position. He even held up fairly well in that spot except against Texans and Eagles, two of the best DLs in the league.

USA wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Someone would have traded for him if the Bears didn't. Maybe they get a 5th instead of a 4th. Teams don't cut 1st team All Pro guys. I can't remember it ever happening.

John Sullivan from the Vikings got cut after making first team All-Pro.

Fair point but Sullivan was hurt when he got cut, Thuney is not. Regardless, reports are already out there that other teams were interested in trading for him, so I think we can confidently put to bed the "would have gotten released" thing.

I mean the John Sullivan thing is just a thought exercise. It’s insanely rare for an All-Pro to get cut, I’m sure the other instances are all injury or off-field related. I was going to say Aldon Smith also, but turns out he spent a season getting suspended before the Niners gave up on him.

I still don’t see a path to getting past third place in this division after this trade, and that’s assuming they will continue to be active in trades/free agency plus whatever they add in the draft. Hill is too steep.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 7:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2460
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
The only real way out of the NFC North basement is going to be very good drafting and very good player development. Sadly these are two things the Bears have been dreadful at for years, and Ryan Poles is arguably the worst drafting GM the Bears have had in my lifetime.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 83260
FavreFan wrote:
billypootons wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
NME wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I think Poles has mostly done a bad job in his tenure but the underlined part is just plainly not true. You don't understand how good Thuney still is.




It has nothing to do with how good he’s been up until this point -it’s a numbers game and KC has to cut cost somewhere and I’m betting he’d have been the odd man out if they couldn’t work out a trade.

Someone would have traded for him if the Bears didn't. Maybe they get a 5th instead of a 4th. Teams don't cut 1st team All Pro guys. I can't remember it ever happening.


they just lost a superbowl because their line couldnt block 4. why did they trade an all pro off a line that wasnt good enough to begin with? they must think he's going to decline and it was time to sell high

They are paying their center and other guard top of the market money already. They have a backup guard they supposedly like to step in. They very badly need a LT, seemingly are trying to redirect resources to that. It makes sense to me why the Chiefs felt they couldn't afford him and why the Bears can.


They would have loved to move that Jawaan Taylor bad contract but nobody would take him. They had way too much money wrapped up in the line and THuney was the obvious choice. He was gone in a year no matter the circumstances and they are pretty astute in drafting lineman in the mid rounds

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 8:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 83260
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
With these moves, their priority for the first two rounds should be DL/LT or DL/DL.


They still need top talent at both DT and DE. They have to have guys who can play well immediately, not just depth.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5457
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Clawmaster wrote:

See this as more of a move to bring in vets who are smart enough to pick up blitzes and line stunts, expect teams to blitz Caleb early and often to see if he has learned how to read and react, having a few vets, especially one that knows Johnson's system is a smart move to aid the progression of your potential QB1. You will get a much better evaluation on Caleb with guys you know are competent on the interior and it will help your running game as well.

Another factor is the lack of quality offensive lineman available in free agency, you would have to overpay for these guys on the open market, they will still have to overpay for a center, but you then have upgrades at all three positions on the interior of your line, a competent RT, and still a huge hole at LT.

Wondering if they take a LT at #10, and go D line with the two second round picks, but would not be surprised if they take a RB with one of the second round picks.




They could have accomplished this by waiting for FA and grabbing a guy like Dalman (or Brooks and the handful of other quality vets hitting the market). Biggest difference there would be theyd still have thier picks and they’d have a dude entering his prime at 25 rather than age 32, or a guy coming off multiple seasons of being unhealthy. That’s a better approach to this imo.


The issue with this current approach is Thuney isn’t going to play for another 5 years and certainly won’t play at an All Pro level for that long if he does stick around. Jackson hasn’t been healthy the last couple of seasons and I’m not banking on that changing. This is the same pattern of patch work in the O-line that Poles has been guilty of since he got here. His process and decision making are bad.


Obviously I hope this works, and of course there’s a chance it does. But even so, it’s not the best way to do this imo

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7136
NME wrote:
Clawmaster wrote:

See this as more of a move to bring in vets who are smart enough to pick up blitzes and line stunts, expect teams to blitz Caleb early and often to see if he has learned how to read and react, having a few vets, especially one that knows Johnson's system is a smart move to aid the progression of your potential QB1. You will get a much better evaluation on Caleb with guys you know are competent on the interior and it will help your running game as well.

Another factor is the lack of quality offensive lineman available in free agency, you would have to overpay for these guys on the open market, they will still have to overpay for a center, but you then have upgrades at all three positions on the interior of your line, a competent RT, and still a huge hole at LT.

Wondering if they take a LT at #10, and go D line with the two second round picks, but would not be surprised if they take a RB with one of the second round picks.




They could have accomplished this by waiting for FA and grabbing a guy like Dalman (or Brooks and the handful of other quality vets hitting the market). Biggest difference there would be theyd still have thier picks and they’d have a dude entering his prime at 25 rather than age 32, or a guy coming off multiple seasons of being unhealthy. That’s a better approach to this imo.


The issue with this current approach is Thuney isn’t going to play for another 5 years and certainly won’t play at an All Pro level for that long if he does stick around. Jackson hasn’t been healthy the last couple of seasons and I’m not banking on that changing. This is the same pattern of patch work in the O-line that Poles has been guilty of since he got here. His process and decision making are bad.


Obviously I hope this works, and of course there’s a chance it does. But even so, it’s not the best way to do this imo


If they don't get Dalman then these moves look even worse. Moving Jackson to C or drafting a rookie C, I hope is not the plan. Sign Dalman, draft a couple OL in the draft and then I am on board.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2460
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
good dolphin wrote:
Chet Coppock's Fur Coat wrote:
With these moves, their priority for the first two rounds should be DL/LT or DL/DL.


They still need top talent at both DT and DE. They have to have guys who can play well immediately, not just depth.

They passed on two All-Pro level guys in consecutive years for Darnell Wrong & Rome Odunze. There is basically zero hope they will figure these positions out in the draft. Even Gervon Dexter sort of turned into a pumpkin. He’s like what? Maybe a top twenty-five defensive tackle in the NFL…saying top twenty would start to be a stretch imho? But it’s hard to say if he’s really worse than somebody like Jordan Davis or Tershawn Wharton because those guys are in such great situations.

End of the day they wouldn’t know a stud defensive line prospect if it fell out of the sky and hit them on the head. Their track record in this realm is just beyond abysmal. Wellness check on Zzzzzaaaccchh Pickens anyone? How about Noah Sewell and Dominique Robinson? They can’t scout or develop this position for shit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 12:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2024 9:01 am
Posts: 2460
pizza_Place: Baranabyis
NME wrote:
They could have accomplished this by waiting for FA and grabbing a guy like Dalman (or Brooks and the handful of other quality vets hitting the market). Biggest difference there would be theyd still have thier picks and they’d have a dude entering his prime at 25 rather than age 32, or a guy coming off multiple seasons of being unhealthy. That’s a better approach to this imo.


The issue with this current approach is Thuney isn’t going to play for another 5 years and certainly won’t play at an All Pro level for that long if he does stick around. Jackson hasn’t been healthy the last couple of seasons and I’m not banking on that changing. This is the same pattern of patch work in the O-line that Poles has been guilty of since he got here. His process and decision making are bad.


Obviously I hope this works, and of course there’s a chance it does. But even so, it’s not the best way to do this imo

I get what you’re saying its a win-now move for a team that flatly is very terrible and cannot draft/develop for shit. Where does this move realistically get you? From five wins inching yourself closer to six with a few more moves?

But on the other hand you gotta stabilize the patient. If they gave up a second for him I’d be up in arms, but they gave up a 2026 fourth. Think of it like giving up a pick in the compensatory formula.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5457
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
USA wrote:
But on the other hand you gotta stabilize the patient. If they gave up a second for him I’d be up in arms, but they gave up a 2026 fourth. Think of it like giving up a pick in the compensatory formula.





Its not just the draft position or the willingness to constantly trade away assets for bandages that irks me tho -it’s the implication. The implication that once again he’s most likely going to ignore the line in the draft. Having a former O-linemen as a GM who seemingly puts no value on said line is about as enigma as it gets imo. I can’t understand for the life of me how this dude is a GM, how anyone with any working football knowledge could sit in a room with him and say ‘yep, he’s the guy’


It’s baffling. This dude should be fetching coffee for higher ups instead of fetching vets for draft picks.


Also keep in mind, yeah it’s a 4th next year.. but he’s also eating up cap space that could limit who you can sign in FA too. It’s a double whammy that way.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Last edited by NME on Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5457
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Juiced wrote:

If they don't get Dalman then these moves look even worse. Moving Jackson to C or drafting a rookie C, I hope is not the plan. Sign Dalman, draft a couple OL in the draft and then I am on board.





Agreed on Dalman. Young established player who could be a cornerstone for the next 5-7 years at a key position. Those are the pitches you swing at.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group