It is currently Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:46 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Hester experiment
PostPosted: Wed Aug 26, 2009 11:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 8:55 pm
Posts: 26000
Location: Lurking Below the Surface...
pizza_Place: Dino's Pizza
For the kind of $$$$ the Bears are paying Devin these days, they want him to be a #1 wide receiver, not the NFL's most dangerous return man everytime he touches the damn football! :x It's my understanding Devin was technically a cornerback when the Bears first drafted him, and needless to say, he couldn't cover anybody back then. Guess what? It was Joe Fan who kept calling into both sports talk radio stations who thought at the time that Hester could make the transition from defense to offense with his speed after he ran back 6 returns for touchdowns early in his career. Hester's been a flop as a receiver, and I'm not so sure he'll ever learn the correct routes and get on the same page with Jay Cutler over the long term.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hester experiment
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:07 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
You guys are overrating just how scared opposing defenses are of Hester.

He has the potential to beat his man deep but he has never shown the ability to consistently do it. You may give up a long touchdown but if I was a coordinator in the NFL I wouldn't concentrate on him until he scores two touchdowns in a game. Forte, Olsen, and the other starting WR are likely to have a bigger impact on the game than Hester. Even if he beats you deep, he's likely to not catch the ball anyways.

I'm not saying defenses will ignore him but the key to stopping the Bears will be stopping Matt Forte. Devin Hester is a sideshow.

I'd force Hester to beat me. From what I've seen in his career, he won't with any consistency.


Hester is in his 3rd year as a WR. He has shown plenty of ability to get deep, but the Bears have never had a QB that could exploit that until now. Already in the preseason, in just 2.5 quarters of play, Hester has had a shot at a 91 yard TD that was overthrown/misjudged, etc....

Setting the bar at 2 TD's in a game before calling Hester a quality target is pretty ridiculous actually. There are plenty of WR's in this NFL that are quality without having multiple TD games. A quality season for Hester would be 1,100+ yards and 7+ TD's. That is less than a TD every other game. Also, I'm not sure Hester has a history of dropping balls, but maybe I'm wrong.

As for Forte and Olsen, and I would throw in Clark, this is exactly what I've been saying. Hester's job will be running off defenses, as well as making some quick slants and quick hitches, etc., but the focus will be Forte and Olsen, who create mismatches, which is what the NFL is all about. The mismatches should be easily exploitable (at least in NFL terms) if Hester is drawing Safety help over the top.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hester experiment
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
BD wrote:
Setting the bar at 2 TD's in a game before calling Hester a quality target is pretty ridiculous actually. There are plenty of WR's in this NFL that are quality without having multiple TD games. A quality season for Hester would be 1,100+ yards and 7+ TD's. That is less than a TD every other game. Also, I'm not sure Hester has a history of dropping balls, but maybe I'm wrong.

Again, your team isn't going to lose a game because Devin Hester caught three passes for 60 yards and a touchdown. I'd be more concerned about Forte and Olsen catching 12 passes for 100 yards rather than the fluke deep pass. Once it is shown to be consistent that it will happen then defenses will be "afraid" of him.

Defenses will treat Hester like a normal WR until he shows he isn't.

Devin Hester will not have over 1100 yards and 7 or more touchdowns. There were 6 players in the NFL last year that did that.

It seems to me that Jay Cutler has figured out that Hester is fools gold. A fast player who isn't a receiver and can't be trusted to come down with the pass unless it is absolutely perfect. I bet he isn't even the #1 pass catcher on the Bears this year.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hester experiment
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:25 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
BD wrote:
Setting the bar at 2 TD's in a game before calling Hester a quality target is pretty ridiculous actually. There are plenty of WR's in this NFL that are quality without having multiple TD games. A quality season for Hester would be 1,100+ yards and 7+ TD's. That is less than a TD every other game. Also, I'm not sure Hester has a history of dropping balls, but maybe I'm wrong.

Again, your team isn't going to lose a game because Devin Hester caught three passes for 60 yards and a touchdown. I'd be more concerned about Forte and Olsen catching 12 passes for 100 yards rather than the fluke deep pass. Once it is shown to be consistent that it will happen then defenses will be "afraid" of him.

Defenses will treat Hester like a normal WR until he shows he isn't.

Devin Hester will not have over 1100 yards and 7 or more touchdowns. There were 6 players in the NFL last year that did that.

It seems to me that Jay Cutler has figured out that Hester is fools gold. A fast player who isn't a receiver and can't be trusted to come down with the pass unless it is absolutely perfect. I bet he isn't even the #1 pass catcher on the Bears this year.


Expect? No. I expect 1,200 yards and 5 TD's, but my point was that you are dogging the guy unless he double dips in TD's in one game, which is not realistic. I'm assuming the TD's were the sticking point on people finishing 1,100 and 7, so how can you set the minimum standard at 2 TD's in a game?

Arguing these points are meaningless. This is the NFL, not 10 year old little league where people assume the Left Fielder can't catch. Teams are going to man up on Hester now that the Bears have a QB with a cannon for an arm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hester experiment
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
BD wrote:
Expect? No. I expect 1,200 yards and 5 TD's, but my point was that you are dogging the guy unless he double dips in TD's in one game, which is not realistic. I'm assuming the TD's were the sticking point on people finishing 1,100 and 7, so how can you set the minimum standard at 2 TD's in a game?

Only 10 WR's had over 1,100 yards and one other fell two yards short.

I'm not setting a minimum standard on anything. I'm saying that defenses aren't going to spend it's time worrying about someone who isn't really a game changer outside of a fluke play. Matt Forte and Greg Olsen are the ones I would worry about as a defense. I figure that if I can stop one or both of them that I have a good shot at winning. If Hester scores a touchdown but Forte averages 3 yards a carry I predict I'll win. If Hester doesn't catch a ball but Forte goes for 120 yards and a touchdown I don't think I'll win.

BD wrote:
Arguing these points are meaningless. This is the NFL, not 10 year old little league where people assume the Left Fielder can't catch. Teams are going to man up on Hester now that the Bears have a QB with a cannon for an arm

Who do you feel will have a bigger impact on a game this year? Olsen or Hester? Forte or Hester? I wouldn't even be surprised if Bennett has a bigger impact. I really don't think you've been paying attention this training camp if you think Hester is a central part of our offense. Just like last year, he'll best be used as a decoy. Defenses are smart enough to know that.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hester experiment
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:01 am 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57238
My head starts spinning every time I hear about all this talk of needing a #1 WR. I agree Hester is no #1, and probably never will be. But do the Bears really need a clear cut #1 guy to win a superbowl? Remind me who was the clear cut #1 WR on the Patriot superbowl teams.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hester experiment
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 11:17 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 7:05 pm
Posts: 12449
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
BD wrote:
Expect? No. I expect 1,200 yards and 5 TD's, but my point was that you are dogging the guy unless he double dips in TD's in one game, which is not realistic. I'm assuming the TD's were the sticking point on people finishing 1,100 and 7, so how can you set the minimum standard at 2 TD's in a game?

Only 10 WR's had over 1,100 yards and one other fell two yards short.

I'm not setting a minimum standard on anything. I'm saying that defenses aren't going to spend it's time worrying about someone who isn't really a game changer outside of a fluke play. Matt Forte and Greg Olsen are the ones I would worry about as a defense. I figure that if I can stop one or both of them that I have a good shot at winning. If Hester scores a touchdown but Forte averages 3 yards a carry I predict I'll win. If Hester doesn't catch a ball but Forte goes for 120 yards and a touchdown I don't think I'll win.

BD wrote:
Arguing these points are meaningless. This is the NFL, not 10 year old little league where people assume the Left Fielder can't catch. Teams are going to man up on Hester now that the Bears have a QB with a cannon for an arm

Who do you feel will have a bigger impact on a game this year? Olsen or Hester? Forte or Hester? I wouldn't even be surprised if Bennett has a bigger impact. I really don't think you've been paying attention this training camp if you think Hester is a central part of our offense. Just like last year, he'll best be used as a decoy. Defenses are smart enough to know that.


We're being silly now. NFL defenses are not going to man up their corners on Hester when he takes off. They are going to move a Safety over that way. It only takes one play to change the entire outcome of a game.

I think statistically that Olsen and Hester will have equally vital roles this year, but Forte will be the gas that makes this engine run. He is the piece that ties the running game to the passing game and can make the offense far from an either/or setup.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hester experiment
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65767
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Nas wrote:
They had a great defense. Really Brady is the exception to the rule. We all saw what happened when he finally got a real WR. Not including the Patriots the past 13 SB winners have had a true #1 target.

Who gets the nod in Baltimore? Ben Coates?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hester experiment
PostPosted: Sat Aug 29, 2009 3:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 6:46 pm
Posts: 33813
pizza_Place: Gioacchino's
Nas wrote:
Devin Hester = Dez White?


That would be terrible. I hope he gets greedy, maybe that will help. I don't know if he'll make it til 2013.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hester experiment
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 4:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
at least rick is here to straighten you guys out.0he's not a top 2 wr on a normal team. it's quite possible the packers have 3 wrs better than him. bd i always thought you were one of the more logical posters here but you're crazy. you're basically saying he'll be a top ten wr.0i'm not sure he'll be top 30

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hester experiment
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:31 pm
Posts: 1103
Location: Roselle
pizza_Place: Oven Grinders
FavreFan wrote:
at least rick is here to straighten you guys out.0he's not a top 2 wr on a normal team. it's quite possible the packers have 3 wrs better than him. bd i always thought you were one of the more logical posters here but you're crazy. you're basically saying he'll be a top ten wr.0i'm not sure he'll be top 30


Without looking at the stats for this. I'd bet Hester's stats from last year were better then half the 2nd starting WRs in the NFL.

Signature bet for a week?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hester experiment
PostPosted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
FavreFan wrote:
at least rick is here to straighten you guys out.0he's not a top 2 wr on a normal team. it's quite possible the packers have 3 wrs better than him. bd i always thought you were one of the more logical posters here but you're crazy. you're basically saying he'll be a top ten wr.0i'm not sure he'll be top 30



The packers may very well have 4 receivers better than him. You know, back in the day the packers had a good kick returner named desmond howard. He changed games for them and even scored in the super bowl, but instead of making him a wr they let the raiders be the idiots and pay him alot of money to play wr.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hester experiment
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92047
Location: To the left of my post
I'm not a defensive scheme expert but it seemed to me as if the Packers were more interested in shutting down Olsen and Forte in the first game. Hester got his touchdown and even got 90 yards but the Bears lost because Olsen was non-existent and Forte averaged under 3 yards a carry.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hester experiment
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 5:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I'm not a defensive scheme expert but it seemed to me as if the Packers were more interested in shutting down Olsen and Forte in the first game. Hester got his touchdown and even got 90 yards but the Bears lost because Olsen was non-existent and Forte averaged under 3 yards a carry.


Forte is a bigger version of James Allen (remember him?) He is a serviceable back,but I fail to see those "special moves" or breakaway speed or "running angry" like I see from the better RB's in the NFL.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hester experiment
PostPosted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 7:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 2:22 pm
Posts: 2121
Hester needs to be benched as a WR immediately! There are so many pro-bowl WR's sitting on the bench because he's hogging all the playing time.

No matter what he should be, on this team he's the #1. Someone has to be the tallest midget.

I would like to see how his stats compared to some guys that people think are decent receivers.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: badrogue17, UltraMAGA and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group