It is currently Fri Feb 21, 2025 7:51 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3466 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11967
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
:lol: 2023 Justin was better than 2024 Caleb if you include the hypothetical TDs Justin would have thrown!


You can "learn" a lot from this dummy!. MANY here often do in fact. :lol: :lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11967
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:

Before we go down the "Just Asking Questions" portion of the show which you dudes love so much, I will simply say this "Moist".

All I ever did as a REAL BEARS FAN is provide the case as to why the Bears traded the wrong player. MANY BEARS FANS would agree. Not only traded the better player but also kept the player who could have brought back significant assets.
That's a "normal sports conversation".

You on the hand, admittedly get "aroused" by watching Caleb Williams play football. A huge difference.

Remember when you made the exact same excuses for the 8-game losing streak haver Justin Fields that you now call irrational and unobjective defenses of Caleb Williams?


The mere fact that the theory behind "tanking" has to be explained to you just further illustrates that you really might want to rethink discussing this "Sports Thing" Tee Time. It's clear that you are too deranged to ever actually "comprehend" how it works.

Ah I get it, any time Justin Fields has sucked, even in his rookie season and in 2022, it's because the team around him was "tanking" (even though they weren't, and arguing that a team is "tanking" is just a different way of arguing that the supporting cast around the QB and the defense are both bad, both of which are defenses of Caleb's play that you have dismissed). But when it comes to talking about the performance of Caleb Williams, the quality and performance of the supporting cast around him is irrelevant.

The concept of tanking actually has to be explained to this idiot.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25452
pizza_Place: Pizanos
Totally not obsessed with Justin Fields.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11967
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Totally not obsessed with Justin Fields.


"Moist" "Moist". If Caleb provided justification for YOUR being "all wet inside" you'd have no problem with discussing the myriad of ways that the Bears improved by moving on from Fields. But because he has not, then you don't. Justin Fields references were all the rage for you and your fellow "Moisture Men" until your guy Caleb sucked ass this season. What happened?

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25452
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Totally not obsessed with Justin Fields.


"Moist" "Moist". If Caleb provided justification for YOUR being "all wet inside" you'd have no problem with discussing the myriad of ways that the Bears improved by moving on from Fields. But because he has not, then you don't. Justin Fields references were all the rage for you and your fellow "Moisture Men" until your guy Caleb sucked ass this season. What happened?

That was barely literate.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11967
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ah I get it, any time Justin Fields has sucked, even in his rookie season and in 2022,

So the kid who finished 10th in MVP during the 2022 season simultaneously "sucked" according to this dope.

Just to reiterate. You can learn a lot from this dummy. MANY often do apparently. Much to this board's "chagrin"

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... s_2022.htm

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11967
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Totally not obsessed with Justin Fields.


"Moist" "Moist". If Caleb provided justification for YOUR being "all wet inside" you'd have no problem with discussing the myriad of ways that the Bears improved by moving on from Fields. But because he has not, then you don't. Justin Fields references were all the rage for you and your fellow "Moisture Men" until your guy Caleb sucked ass this season. What happened?

That was barely literate.


You're flailing worse than Spike Huber at the Old Amphitheater "Moist"

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25452
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ah I get it, any time Justin Fields has sucked, even in his rookie season and in 2022,

So the kid who finished 10th in MVP during the 2022 season simultaneously "sucked" according to this dope.

Just to reiterate. You can learn a lot from this dummy. MANY often do apparently. Much to this board's "chagrin"

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... s_2022.htm

Completely, absolutely not obsessed with Justin Fields. No siree…

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23536
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ah I get it, any time Justin Fields has sucked, even in his rookie season and in 2022,

So the kid who finished 10th in MVP during the 2022 season simultaneously "sucked" according to this dope.

Just to reiterate. You can learn a lot from this dummy. MANY often do apparently. Much to this board's "chagrin"

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... s_2022.htm

His passing production as a rookie was bad, yes, and his production through the air in 2022 was arguably worse in certain respects, especially compared to Caleb as a rookie, so yes.

But let's cut through the bullshit: You want to compare 2022 Justin (his second season) to 2024 Caleb (his rookie season), not because of any glaring age disparity, but because Justin ran for 1000 yards on the ground. Thing is, even if you add up his production in the air and on the ground, Caleb still threw for more yards than Justin had combined passing and rushing, with far fewer interceptions and fumbles.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25452
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Totally not obsessed with Justin Fields.


"Moist" "Moist". If Caleb provided justification for YOUR being "all wet inside" you'd have no problem with discussing the myriad of ways that the Bears improved by moving on from Fields. But because he has not, then you don't. Justin Fields references were all the rage for you and your fellow "Moisture Men" until your guy Caleb sucked ass this season. What happened?

That was barely literate.


You're flailing worse than Spike Huber at the Old Amphitheater "Moist"

I’ve acknowledged that my like for Caleb Williams’ football skills can be brought up alongside your deep emotional connection to Justin Fields.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11967
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Totally not obsessed with Justin Fields.


"Moist" "Moist". If Caleb provided justification for YOUR being "all wet inside" you'd have no problem with discussing the myriad of ways that the Bears improved by moving on from Fields. But because he has not, then you don't. Justin Fields references were all the rage for you and your fellow "Moisture Men" until your guy Caleb sucked ass this season. What happened?

That was barely literate.


You're flailing worse than Spike Huber at the Old Amphitheater "Moist"

I’ve acknowledged that my like for Caleb Williams’ football skills can be brought up alongside your deep emotional connection to Justin Fields.


Nah dude. You're "admittedly"Moist about Caleb. I've provided simple and rather rational observations as to why the Bears would have been better off.. And thus far I've been proven correct. You haven't.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11967
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Ah I get it, any time Justin Fields has sucked, even in his rookie season and in 2022,

So the kid who finished 10th in MVP during the 2022 season simultaneously "sucked" according to this dope.

Just to reiterate. You can learn a lot from this dummy. MANY often do apparently. Much to this board's "chagrin"

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... s_2022.htm

His passing production as a rookie was bad, yes, and his production through the air in 2022 was arguably worse in certain respects, especially compared to Caleb as a rookie, so yes.

But let's cut through the bullshit: You want to compare 2022 Justin (his second season) to 2024 Caleb (his rookie season), not because of any glaring age disparity, but because Justin ran for 1000 yards on the ground. Thing is, even if you add up his production in the air and on the ground, Caleb still threw for more yards than Justin had combined passing and rushing, with far fewer interceptions and fumbles.


Hey Hartgrove. I get that you're rather "moist" as well about Caleb just as your "mentor" happens to be, but now us not the time.

When I provided my "analysis" the Bears were tanking and Fields was on his way to finishing 10th in MVP voting. Thus validating my views as to why he should be kept.

As a REAL BEARS FAN as opposed to a CFMB RIGHT WING cocksucker such as yourself, I've been proven correct on all fronts here. "WE" true Bears fans saw this one coming a mile away and said as such over a year ago.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93594
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
Fields wasn't any better in 2023 than Williams was in 2024.

Yes he was. 20 TDs in 12+ games versus 20 TDs in 17 games validates that he was "better" Brick McCarver

Williams was actually a better overall runner in 2024 than Fields was in 2023.


So now rushing Tds don't "count"? Just Asking A Question

QB rushing touchdowns often are misleading. Lamar Jackson, who may be the best running QB in the league, had 4 of them. Jalen Hurts had 14 of them. Jackson actually ran for a higher yards per rush but also more yards per game.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23536
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
When I provided my "analysis" the Bears were tanking and Fields was on his way to finishing 10th in MVP voting. Thus validating my views as to why he should be kept.

As a REAL BEARS FAN as opposed to a CFMB RIGHT WING cocksucker such as yourself, I've been proven correct on all fronts here. "WE" true Bears fans saw this one coming a mile away and said as such over a year ago.

So now QBs can be assessed independent of the larger success or failure of their team? I distinctly remember you dismissing Caleb's individual performance as irrelevant while his team was losing games despite hefty production from him. Weird how that works.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11967
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
Fields wasn't any better in 2023 than Williams was in 2024.

Yes he was. 20 TDs in 12+ games versus 20 TDs in 17 games validates that he was "better" Brick McCarver

Williams was actually a better overall runner in 2024 than Fields was in 2023.


So now rushing Tds don't "count"? Just Asking A Question

QB rushing touchdowns often are misleading. Lamar Jackson, who may be the best running QB in the league, had 4 of them. Jalen Hurts had 14 of them. Jackson actually ran for a higher yards per rush but also more yards per game.

So Rushing TDs "don't count" McCarver?Just Asking A Question for a second time.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 12:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93594
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
Fields wasn't any better in 2023 than Williams was in 2024.

Yes he was. 20 TDs in 12+ games versus 20 TDs in 17 games validates that he was "better" Brick McCarver

Williams was actually a better overall runner in 2024 than Fields was in 2023.


So now rushing Tds don't "count"? Just Asking A Question

QB rushing touchdowns often are misleading. Lamar Jackson, who may be the best running QB in the league, had 4 of them. Jalen Hurts had 14 of them. Jackson actually ran for a higher yards per rush but also more yards per game.

So Rushing TDs "don't count" McCarver?

Yards per attempt and yards per game are better measures for sure. QB touchdowns are in large part about the preferences of the playcaller and the quality of your running back.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:05 pm
Posts: 25452
pizza_Place: Pizanos
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
Totally not obsessed with Justin Fields.


"Moist" "Moist". If Caleb provided justification for YOUR being "all wet inside" you'd have no problem with discussing the myriad of ways that the Bears improved by moving on from Fields. But because he has not, then you don't. Justin Fields references were all the rage for you and your fellow "Moisture Men" until your guy Caleb sucked ass this season. What happened?

That was barely literate.


You're flailing worse than Spike Huber at the Old Amphitheater "Moist"

I’ve acknowledged that my like for Caleb Williams’ football skills can be brought up alongside your deep emotional connection to Justin Fields.


Nah dude. You're "admittedly"Moist about Caleb. I've provided simple and rather rational observations as to why the Bears would have been better off.. And thus far I've been proven correct. You haven't.

I own that post and will acknowledge I wrote it when I’m inevitably deposed as part of Fields’ restraining order request.

_________________
Peter Clavin wrote:
Because you are stupid, maybe read some books educate yourself.
Nardi wrote:
We walk, talk, and won't shit our pants


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11967
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
I own that post and will acknowledge I wrote it when I’m inevitably deposed as part of Fields’ restraining order request.


The difference between me and you "Moist" is that you have to propagate in order to advance a point while I don't.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11967
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
Yards per attempt and yards per game are better measures for sure. QB touchdowns are in large part about the preferences of the playcaller and the quality of your running back.


It's Brick McCarver and he's once again "theorizing" :lol: :lol:

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93594
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
Yards per attempt and yards per game are better measures for sure. QB touchdowns are in large part about the preferences of the playcaller and the quality of your running back.


It's Brick McCarver and he's once again "theorizing" :lol: :lol:

How about this?

Who is a better runner? Brock Purdy or Lamar Jackson?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11967
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
When I provided my "analysis" the Bears were tanking and Fields was on his way to finishing 10th in MVP voting. Thus validating my views as to why he should be kept.

As a REAL BEARS FAN as opposed to a CFMB RIGHT WING cocksucker such as yourself, I've been proven correct on all fronts here. "WE" true Bears fans saw this one coming a mile away and said as such over a year ago.

So now QBs can be assessed independent of the larger success or failure of their team? I distinctly remember you dismissing Caleb's individual performance as irrelevant while his team was losing games despite hefty production from him. Weird how that works.


It's "weird" how tanking works. You can learn a lot from this dummy! MANY here do in fact.

After reviewing the moves made in 2022, it's fairly evident that the Bears were a team that was "built to win" :roll: :roll:

Quote:
Trades
March 10, 2022: Traded Khalil Mack to Chargers for 2022 2nd round pick (48th overall, Jaquan Brisker) and 2023 6th round pick (200th overall subsequently traded, Scott Matlock)
April 30, 2022: Traded 2022 5th round pick (148th overall, Khalil Shakir) to Bills for 2022 5th round pick (168th overall, Braxton Jones) and 2022 6th round pick (203rd overall, Trestan Ebner)
April 30, 2022: Traded 2022 5th round pick (150th overall, Thomas Booker) to Texans for 2022 5th round pick (166th overall subsequently traded, Tycen Anderson) and 2022 6th round pick (207th overall, Doug Kramer)
April 30, 2022: Traded 2022 5th round pick (166th overall, Tycen Anderson) to Bengals for 2022 5th round pick (174th overall, Dominique Robinson) and 2022 7th round pick (226th overall, Ja'Tyre Carter)
April 30, 2022: Traded 2023 6th round pick (200th overall, Scott Matlock) to Chargers for 2022 7th round pick (254th overall, Elijah Hicks) and 2022 7th round pick (255th overall, Trenton Gill)
July 12, 2022: Traded 2024 7th round pick (231st overall, Jaheim Bell) to Patriots for N'Keal Harry
October 26, 2022: Traded Robert Quinn to Eagles for 2023 4th round pick (133rd overall, Tyler Scott)
October 31, 2022: Traded Roquan Smith to Ravens for 2023 2nd round pick (53rd overall, Gervon Dexter), 2023 5th round pick (148th overall, Noah Sewell) and A.J. Klein
November 1, 2022: Traded 2023 2nd round pick (32nd overall, Joey Porter) to Steelers for Chase Claypool

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11967
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
Yards per attempt and yards per game are better measures for sure. QB touchdowns are in large part about the preferences of the playcaller and the quality of your running back.


It's Brick McCarver and he's once again "theorizing" :lol: :lol:

How about this?

Who is a better runner? Brock Purdy or Lamar Jackson?


The Goalposts sure are a movin McCarver!

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93594
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
Yards per attempt and yards per game are better measures for sure. QB touchdowns are in large part about the preferences of the playcaller and the quality of your running back.


It's Brick McCarver and he's once again "theorizing" :lol: :lol:

How about this?

Who is a better runner? Brock Purdy or Lamar Jackson?


The Goalposts sure are a movin McCarver!

Brock Purdy, in 2024, had more rushing touchdowns than Lamar Jackson. Does that mean that Brock Purdy is a better runner than Lamar Jackson?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11967
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
Yards per attempt and yards per game are better measures for sure. QB touchdowns are in large part about the preferences of the playcaller and the quality of your running back.


It's Brick McCarver and he's once again "theorizing" :lol: :lol:

How about this?

Who is a better runner? Brock Purdy or Lamar Jackson?


The Goalposts sure are a movin McCarver!

Brock Purdy, in 2024, had more rushing touchdowns than Lamar Jackson. Does that mean that Brock Purdy is a better runner than Lamar Jackson?


How is this relevant to my original point regarding Rushing TDs McCarver?

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23536
pizza_Place: Giordano's
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
When I provided my "analysis" the Bears were tanking and Fields was on his way to finishing 10th in MVP voting. Thus validating my views as to why he should be kept.

As a REAL BEARS FAN as opposed to a CFMB RIGHT WING cocksucker such as yourself, I've been proven correct on all fronts here. "WE" true Bears fans saw this one coming a mile away and said as such over a year ago.

So now QBs can be assessed independent of the larger success or failure of their team? I distinctly remember you dismissing Caleb's individual performance as irrelevant while his team was losing games despite hefty production from him. Weird how that works.


It's "weird" how tanking works. You can learn a lot from this dummy! MANY here do in fact.

After reviewing the moves made in 2022, it's fairly evident that the Bears were a team that was "built to win" :roll: :roll:

Quote:
Trades
March 10, 2022: Traded Khalil Mack to Chargers for 2022 2nd round pick (48th overall, Jaquan Brisker) and 2023 6th round pick (200th overall subsequently traded, Scott Matlock)
April 30, 2022: Traded 2022 5th round pick (148th overall, Khalil Shakir) to Bills for 2022 5th round pick (168th overall, Braxton Jones) and 2022 6th round pick (203rd overall, Trestan Ebner)
April 30, 2022: Traded 2022 5th round pick (150th overall, Thomas Booker) to Texans for 2022 5th round pick (166th overall subsequently traded, Tycen Anderson) and 2022 6th round pick (207th overall, Doug Kramer)
April 30, 2022: Traded 2022 5th round pick (166th overall, Tycen Anderson) to Bengals for 2022 5th round pick (174th overall, Dominique Robinson) and 2022 7th round pick (226th overall, Ja'Tyre Carter)
April 30, 2022: Traded 2023 6th round pick (200th overall, Scott Matlock) to Chargers for 2022 7th round pick (254th overall, Elijah Hicks) and 2022 7th round pick (255th overall, Trenton Gill)
July 12, 2022: Traded 2024 7th round pick (231st overall, Jaheim Bell) to Patriots for N'Keal Harry
October 26, 2022: Traded Robert Quinn to Eagles for 2023 4th round pick (133rd overall, Tyler Scott)
October 31, 2022: Traded Roquan Smith to Ravens for 2023 2nd round pick (53rd overall, Gervon Dexter), 2023 5th round pick (148th overall, Noah Sewell) and A.J. Klein
November 1, 2022: Traded 2023 2nd round pick (32nd overall, Joey Porter) to Steelers for Chase Claypool

I don't think there's that much of a difference between assessing a QBs performance in light of a team that is trying to be bad versus assessing performance of a QB whose team is just bad by virtue of incompetent talent acquisition.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93594
Location: To the left of my post
It shows that comparing qb rushing statistics but especially touchdowns can lead to incorrect conclusions as you seem to be doing.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11967
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
When I provided my "analysis" the Bears were tanking and Fields was on his way to finishing 10th in MVP voting. Thus validating my views as to why he should be kept.

As a REAL BEARS FAN as opposed to a CFMB RIGHT WING cocksucker such as yourself, I've been proven correct on all fronts here. "WE" true Bears fans saw this one coming a mile away and said as such over a year ago.

So now QBs can be assessed independent of the larger success or failure of their team? I distinctly remember you dismissing Caleb's individual performance as irrelevant while his team was losing games despite hefty production from him. Weird how that works.


It's "weird" how tanking works. You can learn a lot from this dummy! MANY here do in fact.

After reviewing the moves made in 2022, it's fairly evident that the Bears were a team that was "built to win" :roll: :roll:

Quote:
Trades
March 10, 2022: Traded Khalil Mack to Chargers for 2022 2nd round pick (48th overall, Jaquan Brisker) and 2023 6th round pick (200th overall subsequently traded, Scott Matlock)
April 30, 2022: Traded 2022 5th round pick (148th overall, Khalil Shakir) to Bills for 2022 5th round pick (168th overall, Braxton Jones) and 2022 6th round pick (203rd overall, Trestan Ebner)
April 30, 2022: Traded 2022 5th round pick (150th overall, Thomas Booker) to Texans for 2022 5th round pick (166th overall subsequently traded, Tycen Anderson) and 2022 6th round pick (207th overall, Doug Kramer)
April 30, 2022: Traded 2022 5th round pick (166th overall, Tycen Anderson) to Bengals for 2022 5th round pick (174th overall, Dominique Robinson) and 2022 7th round pick (226th overall, Ja'Tyre Carter)
April 30, 2022: Traded 2023 6th round pick (200th overall, Scott Matlock) to Chargers for 2022 7th round pick (254th overall, Elijah Hicks) and 2022 7th round pick (255th overall, Trenton Gill)
July 12, 2022: Traded 2024 7th round pick (231st overall, Jaheim Bell) to Patriots for N'Keal Harry
October 26, 2022: Traded Robert Quinn to Eagles for 2023 4th round pick (133rd overall, Tyler Scott)
October 31, 2022: Traded Roquan Smith to Ravens for 2023 2nd round pick (53rd overall, Gervon Dexter), 2023 5th round pick (148th overall, Noah Sewell) and A.J. Klein
November 1, 2022: Traded 2023 2nd round pick (32nd overall, Joey Porter) to Steelers for Chase Claypool

I don't think

Great time to place a "cease and desist order" on this post before proceeding further Hartgrove

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2023 7:35 am
Posts: 11967
pizza_Place: Ricobene's
Brick wrote:
It shows that comparing qb rushing statistics but especially touchdowns can lead to incorrect conclusions as you seem to be doing.

So the question lacks relevance. Got it.

_________________
Darkside wrote:
I've seen hundreds of dicks in my life.

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
You get moist for Caleb when you watch college football
.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93594
Location: To the left of my post
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Brick wrote:
It shows that comparing qb rushing statistics but especially touchdowns can lead to incorrect conclusions as you seem to be doing.

So the question lacks relevance. Got it.

The question, about QB rushing touchdowns, is relevant to a discussion about QB rushing touchdowns.

Just say "I don't want to answer because I have no good answer".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 17, 2025 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66050
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
billypootons wrote:
no clue why anyone is still talking about justin fields. the guy sucks at qb. it was the right call to move on, but it may not work out. not all correct decisions work out in the NFL


This one is a little different than simply making a "bad decision". This was a franchise altering decision. Bears would have been a playoff team this year had they made the correct move.
Instead we're back to once again whining about owners, finance guys, GMs, Head Coaches, Assistant Coaches, The O-Line, Running Backs, etc

Objection you honor! Speculation.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3466 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group