Nas wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Cutler wasn't perfect, but he played well enough to win the game.
For the 2nd week in a row he is way down the list of reasons why the Bears lost.
The problem is he is NEVER the reason why they won. The Bears are about to invest a shit load of money into a player that isn't a difference maker. He does enough where a L usually doesn't fall on his shoulders. To make $17M a year you need to be a difference maker. He hasn't even been responsible for a playoff win.
It's tricky. You know, if you look at the 'advanced' stats, he had a really good game. Eye-test said he performed well (there were several costly drops). But, once again, he fails to break 300 yards against a porous defense. He's like the king of putting up confusing stat-lines. I'm ready to cut bait, personally. This game wasn't what did it, but this game also didn't sway me either way. IMO, he's a guy. He's like the 15th best QB in a given season. I don't think we
have to dump him, but I sure don't want to see a long-term contract for huge bucks. Everyone says that McCown is a replacement-level QB; if that's true, our offense does as well or better with a replacement-level QB as it does with Cutler. So you stand a good chance of replacing Cutler on the cheap. Do
that.
_________________
You can't see me because of internet.
The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?