Better in which stats?

_________________

If they play in the same number of games. Total Tds. (Run and Passing) Avg yard per pass attempt. Completion%. Total Yards from scrimmage. QBR. Avg yards per completion. Number of completions over 20 yards. On target %. Bad throw % TD%

How MANY more do you need?

_________________

.

Just asking a question there partner. The parameters are set per your benchmarks. And by the way, we are only talking about 2025.

Edited 1354 times in total

_________________

No doubt you have Caleb to be better so we will see.

_________________

.

Yes that is the point of my previous post. Your stats, Fields v Williams stacked up against each other in 25. Ready to go to war with your boy?

_________________

I'm not worried. So what's your "parameters"?

_________________

.

The ones you just picked.

_________________

The suspense is over, he will wear #7 in NY

dr Style would find a way to deflect a stats based bet if he lost. he's that good at this thing

I proposed this four or five pages back.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.

When it comes to the bets I would honor it. Though I need to refresh on what the parameters were first. However these dudes would declare "victory" simply by "winning" 1 out of 10. And I don't have time for that B.S.

_________________

.

If they play in the same number of games.
1.Total Tds. (Run and Passing)
2. Avg yard per pass attempt.
3. Completion%.
4. Total Yards from scrimmage.
5. QBR.
6. Avg yards per completion.
7. Number of completions over 20 yards.
8. On target %.
9. Bad throw %
10. TD%
Whomever wins 6 of these categories wins. We can another just in case there is a tie? Deal?

_________________

.

You snuck in (games played) Should have an * for when Fields gets benched. Williams will end up with more games if healthy. Change it to number of games while healthy.

_________________

It can be number of games played. Keep in mind your "benching" prognostications haven't fared too well in the past have they?

And at this point you're nothing more than a backseat driver. Whenever you had a chance to "put it on the line" you make like Edwin Moses at the 84 summer games.
You're worse than Peep Show Darko when it comes to "side swiping" posting habits.

_________________

.

You snuck in (games played) Should have an * for when Fields gets benched. Williams will end up with more games if healthy. Change it to number of games while healthy.[/quote]
It can be number of games played. Keep in mind your "benching" prognostications haven't fared too well in the past have they?



Fields was benched for R.Wilson. What is your point?

_________________

It's interesting you included at least 4 categories that skew heavily to players who don't throw very much but not a single one about interceptions.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

And this is why Brick is still utterly convinced that Caleb Williams had one helluva season. In spite of whatever he says on this particular board

_________________

.

Russell Wilson was always considered the starter. Which in retrospect, was still a most fateful decision on Tomlin's part. And No one still has ever been benched for Tyson Bagent.

_________________

.