It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 6:18 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1016 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 ... 34  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Keyser Soze wrote:
Nas wrote:
If the Bears don't make the playoffs next season it is highly unlikely the Cutler Ass Lickers Lodge (Bucky Chris/Dr Ken/Frank/Spanky) will find fault with anything he does.

For the first time on this board I want to part of something. I want to be in the Cutler Ass Lickers Lodge. Just because I don't post about him 150 times a day (wow people) doesn't mean my tongue isn't all up in his shit. Someone please PM me (I'm sure I can figure out how to open it) the time and location of the next meeting. I'll buy and wear a Jay Cutler jersey for a week as my initiation.

You said Cutler being signed meant you could watch Bears games for the foreseeable future

What did you think of McCown?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
I think he did a good job and I hope they resign him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
30 pages??????? COME ON!

1.Who cares what the deal is for the Guaranteed money. You know it is about $50 Mill. Over 3 or 4 years.
2. Lets say it is over 3 years. Which is what I think it is, so about $16.7M a year for 3 years.
3. Lets say year 3 shows up and they want to spend more cap money and they still want Jay. Spread it into year 4...then year 5.
4. Example: With Peppers due a $10.5 million roster bonus for 2011, the Bears restructured the defensive end's contract on Feb. 23 to reduce his salary cap number from $12 million to $4.3 million in anticipation of the cap returning once a new collective bargaining is reached between the NFL and the players union.

Jay will get $50 mill, one way or another. if its over 3 years, or if its Reinsdorf style over 20 years. he will get his money now.

the point being, he is getting big money for 3 years and expect a new deal in 4 years.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:24 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
bigfan wrote:
30 pages??????? COME ON!

1.Who cares what the deal is for the Guaranteed money. You know it is about $50 Mill. Over 3 or 4 years.
2. Lets say it is over 3 years. Which is what I think it is, so about $16.7M a year for 3 years.
3. Lets say year 3 shows up and they want to spend more cap money and they still want Jay. Spread it into year 4...then year 5.
4. Example: With Peppers due a $10.5 million roster bonus for 2011, the Bears restructured the defensive end's contract on Feb. 23 to reduce his salary cap number from $12 million to $4.3 million in anticipation of the cap returning once a new collective bargaining is reached between the NFL and the players union.

Jay will get $50 mill, one way or another. if its over 3 years, or if its Reinsdorf style over 20 years. he will get his money now.

the point being, he is getting big money for 3 years and expect a new deal in 4 years.


Read the thread!

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
not reading 30 pages

Lotsa felixibility in the deal, thats all that matters.

of course at $12M per home in Malibu, the flexibility gets a little stiffer!

Image

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
At least read the part where Speegel took a post from Reddit and passed it off as a personal source


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2014 11:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Nas wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
The funniest thing about this thread is the idea that the Bears don't want Cutler.

Of course the contract doesn't make sense if the Bears are trying to figure out how to get out of it in the 1st year.

They don't want to! They like him and structured a deal to try to keep him for a long time. Hate it if you want to but they know Cutler's floor. In a bad offense he's won 58% of his games. I'm sorry he won 1% of the games and the team won the other 57%. However you want to look at it.

They think he'll be better with continuity in the offense for the first time in 5 years for him and some solid weapons around him.

Peyton Manning's best career year was his 7th. He improved significantly in his 7th year.

Drew Brees best year was his 9th or 11th.

Tom Brady was his 8th.

The thought that a QB never gets better after his 7th or 8th year is silly.


Cutler had Martz for 2 seasons. The rest of this was really silly. I really can't believe you tried to make the connection to THOSE quarterbacks. WOW!


That was already addressed. Keep reading.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 12:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Nas wrote:
This could work out of the Bears in a few ways. I think Cutler will be better next season IF he stays healthy. IMO his best season by far as a Bear was his final year with Martz. He appeared to "get it" and was playing at a high level before his hand injury and Forte's injury killed the Bears season. That also happens to have been his 2nd year in the offense. He may approach 5000 yards next season and 40 touchdowns.

His best season was last season. He wasn't great by any means, but if he puts up those numbers, there's no reason for complaint. (edit by "those" I mean the numbers Nas mentioned).

Quote:
I hate the fact that Cutler is getting $22.5M next season BUT if he is playing at a high level he will have a deal that is easy to trade IF the Bears chose to. Probably unlikely but I believe Emery and Trestman's jobs are tied to what Cutler does in 3 years.

For sure. Clearly, the gamble is that he's very good for more than 3 years. As it stands, they're paying him near-franchise levels for 3 years, guaranteed. Evidently, they're gambling that Jay will be great, and will be a bargain in years 4-7. I'm not thrilled about that gamble, but that's what it is.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 12:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:35 pm
Posts: 6248
Location: Crown Point, Indiana (obviously)
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Nas wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
The funniest thing about this thread is the idea that the Bears don't want Cutler.

Of course the contract doesn't make sense if the Bears are trying to figure out how to get out of it in the 1st year.

They don't want to! They like him and structured a deal to try to keep him for a long time. Hate it if you want to but they know Cutler's floor. In a bad offense he's won 58% of his games. I'm sorry he won 1% of the games and the team won the other 57%. However you want to look at it.

They think he'll be better with continuity in the offense for the first time in 5 years for him and some solid weapons around him.

Peyton Manning's best career year was his 7th. He improved significantly in his 7th year.

Drew Brees best year was his 9th or 11th.

Tom Brady was his 8th.

The thought that a QB never gets better after his 7th or 8th year is silly.


Cutler had Martz for 2 seasons. The rest of this was really silly. I really can't believe you tried to make the connection to THOSE quarterbacks. WOW!


That was already addressed. Keep reading.

The King's addressed it all, naturally.

_________________
You can't see me because of internet.

The landowner effectively owns part shares in millions of part-time slaves called, "taxpayers." -Roy L
A Personal Relationship with Jesus?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 1:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40650
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
I really don't know Panther? Let's see the Bears want Cutler. They gave him a normal contract that other teams seem to do. A lot of people really piss and moan because they want McCown or Orton. I think that summary works.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 1:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:43 pm
Posts: 20537
pizza_Place: Joes Pizza
Cutler apologists versus Cutler haters.

Also Matt Spiegel used a hypothetical compensation table someone fabricated off the internet as a trusted source.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 7:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 10:28 am
Posts: 11792
Location: Winnetka, Illinois
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Nas wrote:
Cutler may approach 5000 yards next season and 40 touchdowns.



What???? A guy who has never had more than 27 TD's is going to have 40? I highly doubt it. In the season he had the 27 TD's he also had 26 INT's. I think it's more likely he will have less than 30 TD's, have an injury or two and throw 15 or more INT's.

_________________
Go Cubs!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 8:22 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
:shock:

Cutler will make $54 million over the next three years, with a rolling guarantee that starts at $17.5 million upon signing, increases to $38 million on March 14, 2014, moves to $48 million in March 2015, and caps out at $54 million in March 2016.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2014 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
This is smart for the Bears. I imagine it will be restructured at some point.


Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter 14m
Jay Cutler's contract carries $22.5 mi salary-cap number for 2014. Contract has no pro-rated bonuses but CHIC can restructure at any time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:19 pm
Posts: 980
Clearly they traded significant flexibility for an early cap hit. Cutler haters should actually rejoice. That is unless you are delusional enough to believe they had any other choice but to resign the guy.

This is the least painful, and most intelligent way to deal with the situation.

_________________
"Mattress technology has come a long way"

- Dan Bernstein, 2016


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
mrgoodkat wrote:
Clearly they traded significant flexibility for an early cap hit. Cutler haters should actually rejoice. That is unless you are delusional enough to believe they had any other choice but to resign the guy.
They didn't trade flexibility. This deal basically is just them franchise tagging Cutler for 3 years with a minor savings in terms of payout by giving up the right to move on a year to year basis. Cutler lovers like yourself seem pretty happy too.

I can't complain about the cap hit in year one either because the Bears need to rebuild anyways and next year should be a down year.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:43 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Bucky Chris wrote:
This is smart for the Bears. I imagine it will be restructured at some point.


Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter 14m
Jay Cutler's contract carries $22.5 mi salary-cap number for 2014. Contract has no pro-rated bonuses but CHIC can restructure at any time.



I posted a link from Business Insider last week that explained that. Did anyone really think Matt Spiegel grabbing numbers off Reddit was more credible than Business Insider?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:45 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79560
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
mrgoodkat wrote:
Clearly they traded significant flexibility for an early cap hit. Cutler haters should actually rejoice. That is unless you are delusional enough to believe they had any other choice but to resign the guy.

This is the least painful, and most intelligent way to deal with the situation.


I do understand this viewpoint. I guess if you think Cutler is good enough that you don't want to replace him in the next three or four years or if you won't be able to even if you try it really makes sense. I just don't think he's shown himself to be good enough for that type of commitment.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 7:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
mrgoodkat wrote:
Clearly they traded significant flexibility for an early cap hit. Cutler haters should actually rejoice. That is unless you are delusional enough to believe they had any other choice but to resign the guy.

This is the least painful, and most intelligent way to deal with the situation.


I do understand this viewpoint. I guess if you think Cutler is good enough that you don't want to replace him in the next three or four years or if you won't be able to even if you try it really makes sense. I just don't think he's shown himself to be good enough for that type of commitment.
The worst part, regardless of if Cutler was signed for $1 or $126 million is that they are going to half ass a quarterback draft pick and hope they get incredibly lucky with a later round quarterback that becomes something. You just can't justify a 1st or 2nd round pick at quarterback this year. For a fourth round pick, you can only realistically hope he becomes as good as Kyle Orton did. Tom Brady and Tony Romo are so rare it shouldn't even be seriously considered a plan.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
This is smart for the Bears. I imagine it will be restructured at some point.


Adam Schefter ‏@AdamSchefter 14m
Jay Cutler's contract carries $22.5 mi salary-cap number for 2014. Contract has no pro-rated bonuses but CHIC can restructure at any time.



I posted a link from Business Insider last week that explained that. Did anyone really think Matt Spiegel grabbing numbers off Reddit was more credible than Business Insider?


If that article had the part about being able to restructure at any time, I missed it. And I think it was an important topic we haven't discussed. They could restructure it this year, or in season if they get raped by injuries again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Bucky Chris wrote:
If that article had the part about being able to restructure at any time, I missed it. And I think it was an important topic we haven't discussed. They could restructure it this year, or in season if they get raped by injuries again.
Can't just about any deal be restructured?

He's getting his guaranteed money over these 3 years. I don't know what there would be to restructure. They way this looks is they either redo his deal in year 4 or they let him walk.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
If that article had the part about being able to restructure at any time, I missed it. And I think it was an important topic we haven't discussed. They could restructure it this year, or in season if they get raped by injuries again.
Can't just about any deal be restructured?

He's getting his guaranteed money over these 3 years. I don't know what there would be to restructure. They way this looks is they either redo his deal in year 4 or they let him walk.


No, not unless they player lets them. There is probably language that gives the club more flexibility than usual. One obvious restructure could be flipping the 2014 and 2016 years if free agency ends up costing them more in this offseason. Or if he's playing well, they could put some guaranteed money in year 4. Lots of options.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
mrgoodkat wrote:
Clearly they traded significant flexibility for an early cap hit. Cutler haters should actually rejoice. That is unless you are delusional enough to believe they had any other choice but to resign the guy.

This is the least painful, and most intelligent way to deal with the situation.


I do understand this viewpoint. I guess if you think Cutler is good enough that you don't want to replace him in the next three or four years or if you won't be able to even if you try it really makes sense. I just don't think he's shown himself to be good enough for that type of commitment.
The worst part, regardless of if Cutler was signed for $1 or $126 million is that they are going to half ass a quarterback draft pick and hope they get incredibly lucky with a later round quarterback that becomes something. You just can't justify a 1st or 2nd round pick at quarterback this year. For a fourth round pick, you can only realistically hope he becomes as good as Kyle Orton did. Tom Brady and Tony Romo are so rare it shouldn't even be seriously considered a plan.


Everyone who hates Cutler/wanted McCown or a drafted QB should believe Trestman should be able to pull a serviceable QB out of a later round.


Let's also not forget that you have to be pretty lucky to even get a QB in the first round that's a capable starter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Bucky Chris wrote:
No, not unless they player lets them. There is probably language that gives the club more flexibility than usual. One obvious restructure could be flipping the 2014 and 2016 years if free agency ends up costing them more in this offseason. Or if he's playing well, they could put some guaranteed money in year 4. Lots of options.
I don't think you are right. The major difference here is that the signing bonus wasn't up front. It looks like they guaranteed money in years 2 and 3 instead of it. Cutler isn't going to restructure for anything but more money which is what pretty much any player would do. He's not deferring payments or anything like that. At best, this would be the Bears giving him more money in year 4 or 5 with a guarantee, which is normally referred to as an extension, but in this case the Bears have him "under contract" for 7 years so calling it an extension doesn't make sense.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92083
Location: To the left of my post
Bucky Chris wrote:
Everyone who hates Cutler/wanted McCown or a drafted QB should believe Trestman should be able to pull a serviceable QB out of a later round.
Is that the plan of the Cutler lovers? They are going to start pretending like the bad quarterback the Bears get in round 5 is what everyone wanted?

No, you still draft a quarterback high. We want a quarterback who is better than Cutler and McCown. The higher rounds offer a much better shot at that.
Bucky Chris wrote:
Let's also not forget that you have to be pretty lucky to even get a QB in the first round that's a capable starter.
No.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Bucky Chris wrote:
Everyone who hates Cutler/wanted McCown or a drafted QB should believe Trestman should be able to pull a serviceable QB out of a later round.
Is that the plan of the Cutler lovers? They are going to start pretending like the bad quarterback the Bears get in round 5 is what everyone wanted?

No, you still draft a quarterback high. We want a quarterback who is better than Cutler and McCown. The higher rounds offer a much better shot at that.
Bucky Chris wrote:
Let's also not forget that you have to be pretty lucky to even get a QB in the first round that's a capable starter.
No.


Ok


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
mrgoodkat wrote:
Clearly they traded significant flexibility for an early cap hit. Cutler haters should actually rejoice. That is unless you are delusional enough to believe they had any other choice but to resign the guy.

This is the least painful, and most intelligent way to deal with the situation.


I do understand this viewpoint. I guess if you think Cutler is good enough that you don't want to replace him in the next three or four years or if you won't be able to even if you try it really makes sense. I just don't think he's shown himself to be good enough for that type of commitment.
The worst part, regardless of if Cutler was signed for $1 or $126 million is that they are going to half ass a quarterback draft pick and hope they get incredibly lucky with a later round quarterback that becomes something. You just can't justify a 1st or 2nd round pick at quarterback this year. For a fourth round pick, you can only realistically hope he becomes as good as Kyle Orton did. Tom Brady and Tony Romo are so rare it shouldn't even be seriously considered a plan.

I was kinda on board with McCown and a draft pick, but you seem overly excited by the idea of drafting a QB.

I mean you're acting like they are really missing out on something special in these next couple years. It's always a longshot right?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:22 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
There is a better chance one of these QB's will become a top 5 player than there is Cutler becoming a top 10 player.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Nas wrote:
There is a better chance one of these QB's will become a top 5 player than there is Cutler becoming a top 10 player.

Come on.

Both are 0.00001


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 7 yr deal for Cutler
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2014 9:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Nas wrote:
There is a better chance one of these QB's will become a top 5 player than there is Cutler becoming a top 10 player.


Ouch, considering Cutler started off the first 3 games in the top 5 (3), I don't think that's accurate. But it may be.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1016 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 ... 34  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group