It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 6:35 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 230 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Nas wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Maybe it's just a sad reality that Lovie is Defense Mike Martz. Runs his gimmick system, looks great when you have all stars all over the field, looks terrible when you dont, the league has passed his thinking by, you ignore the other side of the ball to the detriment of the entire team....


The Bears had stars all over the field? When did they happen? Fact is many of the defensive players were mediocre at best.

There wasn't a lot of talent on the team most seasons but somehow Lovie managed to have them in playoff contention.


They had a GOAT at LB, a hall of very good at LB, a HOF CB, in early years an all star DT (albeit injury prone), and in later years a GOAT DE.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:23 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
veganfan21 wrote:
I think we are going too far back in history when we start crediting Tampa's success to Lovie. Maybe partially, but hard to have that much influence as a position coach.


Crediting Lovie with Tampa's success is historical revisionism, not historical accuracy.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
whoever might possibly have wrote:
crediting Tampa's success to Lovie


Hopefully the dumbest notion I'll read today ... it's early though ...

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Tall Midget wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Lovie wasn't even one of the three most important defensive coaches on those great Tampa teams. Dungy, Kiffin and Marinelli all played a much bigger role in the team's success than he did as linebackers coach.

What are you basing this on?

All Ive ever read/heard about it includes a lot of credit for Lovie for the performance and creation of the Tampa 2


What articles are you referencing?

Ive heard Dungy talk up Lovie's contributions to it. Im trying to find articles from that era but now that he's back with the Bucs its all 2014 stuff.

Im not gonna argue it that much because the early Bucs years are not a big part of the Lovie success. It was just another place he was at with a great defense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Hank Scorpio wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Coach A
Games over .500: 21
Super Bowl Wins: 0
Overall Championships: 0
Conference Championships: 1
Division Championships: 2

Coach B
Games over .500: 18
Super Bowl Wins: 0
Overall Championships: 0
Conference Championships: 1
Division Championships: 3

Who is Martz and who is Lovie?

One guy took over a Super Bowl runner up with Kurt Warner as QB

The other guy took over a 7-9 team with Rex Grossman.


Also, he had Warner for two seasons. He had the immortal Bulger for the rest of his tenure.

Are you kidding?

Bulger was real good for a while and much better than Rex.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:27 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Nas wrote:
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Maybe it's just a sad reality that Lovie is Defense Mike Martz. Runs his gimmick system, looks great when you have all stars all over the field, looks terrible when you dont, the league has passed his thinking by, you ignore the other side of the ball to the detriment of the entire team....


The Bears had stars all over the field? When did they happen? Fact is many of the defensive players were mediocre at best.

There wasn't a lot of talent on the team most seasons but somehow Lovie managed to have them in playoff contention.


They had a GOAT at LB, a hall of very good at LB, a HOF CB, in early years an all star DT (albeit injury prone), and in later years a GOAT DE.


The LBer and Safety were the only players that were studs before Lovie arrived. All I've heard over the past few years was how bad Peppers was. I didn't agree with that but clearly his best days were behind him. Also you need more than 3 or 4 good to great players to have sustained success in the NFL but somehow the Bears kept winning.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Don Tiny wrote:
whoever might possibly have wrote:
crediting Tampa's success to Lovie


Hopefully the dumbest notion I'll read today ... it's early though ...

Good thing you didnt read it.


Here is the closest thing anyone said to that


Amazing how he keeps lucking into great defenses (Bucs, Rams, Bears) and very coincidental that Tillman just happened to become a turnover machine as soon as Lovie took over.


Not exactly crediting as presented.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Tall Midget wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I think we are going too far back in history when we start crediting Tampa's success to Lovie. Maybe partially, but hard to have that much influence as a position coach.


Crediting Lovie with Tampa's success is historical revisionism, not historical accuracy.


Yes definitely revisionist. Separately, not directed to TM, it's not fair to diminish his likability as a coach. Likability without success is rightfully irrelevant, but him being likable was indeed part of why he enjoyed success.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
I can't wait for Tampa to suck and you all start the Lovie excuses start flying .

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
312player wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Lovie wasn't even one of the three most important defensive coaches on those great Tampa teams. Dungy, Kiffin and Marinelli all played a much bigger role in the team's success than he did as linebackers coach.

What are you basing this on?

All Ive ever read/heard about it includes a lot of credit for Lovie for the performance and creation of the Tampa 2






No....the Steelers ran it in the 70S....Dungy took it from them.

They ran a version of the Cover 2 and it was adopted and modernized by Dungy and whoever in TB


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:31 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
312player wrote:
I can't wait for Tampa to suck and you all start the Lovie excuses start flying .


They may not make the playoffs this year but they won't suck. By next season they will be a tough team to beat.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
whoever might possibly have wrote:
crediting Tampa's success to Lovie


Hopefully the dumbest notion I'll read today ... it's early though ...

Good thing you didnt read it.


Here is the closest thing anyone said to that


Amazing how he keeps lucking into great defenses (Bucs, Rams, Bears) and very coincidental that Tillman just happened to become a turnover machine as soon as Lovie took over.


Not exactly crediting as presented.


I was going more with this:

rogers park bryan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Lovie wasn't even one of the three most important defensive coaches on those great Tampa teams. Dungy, Kiffin and Marinelli all played a much bigger role in the team's success than he did as linebackers coach.

What are you basing this on?

All Ive ever read/heard about it includes a lot of credit for Lovie for the performance and creation of the Tampa 2

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Tall Midget wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I dont see the relevance. The NFL is a year to year league. Im not saying he invented defense in STL

And I dont think you can take that precipitous a drop and say it was just a players let down.


Read my post again. I attribute the decline to both a player letdown AND the departure of two key coaches, one of whom (Bud Carson, the de facto defensive coordinator) is widely regarded as one of the greatest defensive minds in the history of the NFL.

Ok. How does that diminish the job Lovie did building them back up?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
veganfan21 wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
whoever might possibly have wrote:
crediting Tampa's success to Lovie


Hopefully the dumbest notion I'll read today ... it's early though ...

Good thing you didnt read it.


Here is the closest thing anyone said to that


Amazing how he keeps lucking into great defenses (Bucs, Rams, Bears) and very coincidental that Tillman just happened to become a turnover machine as soon as Lovie took over.


Not exactly crediting as presented.


I was going more with this:

rogers park bryan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Lovie wasn't even one of the three most important defensive coaches on those great Tampa teams. Dungy, Kiffin and Marinelli all played a much bigger role in the team's success than he did as linebackers coach.

What are you basing this on?

All Ive ever read/heard about it includes a lot of credit for Lovie for the performance and creation of the Tampa 2

I didnt mean that to reference only his Bucs years. The creation part was but the success came later with the Bears.

Guess I wasnt too clear on that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
312player wrote:
I can't wait for Tampa to suck and you all start the Lovie excuses start flying .

Hilarious.

Lovie is a winning coach right now. The excuses are on your side of the argument, playa


And how do you know his amazing luck wont continue?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
I will freely admit that some of my Lovie dislike is bitterness over how he coached the team but I still dont think that I would consider him a good coach if he did the same thing and had the same record in AZ or San Diego.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
rogers park bryan wrote:
312player wrote:
I can't wait for Tampa to suck and you all start the Lovie excuses start flying .

Hilarious.

Lovie is a winning coach right now. The excuses are on your side of the argument, playa


And how do you know his amazing luck wont continue?


Yeah, I'm not rooting for him to suck. I dont take any particular joy in it. I just think that he will.

I think the horseshoe fell out of his ass at the end of his tenure in Chicago. Maybe he can get a new one jammed up there but once its gone, its usually gone.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:40 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I dont see the relevance. The NFL is a year to year league. Im not saying he invented defense in STL

And I dont think you can take that precipitous a drop and say it was just a players let down.


Read my post again. I attribute the decline to both a player letdown AND the departure of two key coaches, one of whom (Bud Carson, the de facto defensive coordinator) is widely regarded as one of the greatest defensive minds in the history of the NFL.

Ok. How does that diminish the job Lovie did building them back up?


He did a good job after the defense had a single off year. It wasn't like he had a Herculean task, though. I think he's a good defensive coach, but he most assuredly did not create the Tampa 2, was not a key coach on the great Tampa defenses, and did not consistently produce a great defense with the Bears.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
Hank Scorpio wrote:
Yeah, I'm not rooting for him to suck. I dont take any particular joy in it. I just think that he will.


Haven't seen or heard anything compelling for me to think those aren't the most reasonable thoughts to have on him and his future, such as it may be.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Tall Midget wrote:

He did a good job after the defense had a single off year. It wasn't like he had a Herculean task, though. I think he's a good defensive coach, but he most assuredly did not create the Tampa 2, was not a key coach on the great Tampa defenses, and did not consistently produce a great defense with the Bears.

Not a key coach? What are you basing that on? Their linebacker core was pretty good.

Obviously the head coach and D coordinator get more credit but to be specifically saying he wasnt a key coach seems odd.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:51 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:

He did a good job after the defense had a single off year. It wasn't like he had a Herculean task, though. I think he's a good defensive coach, but he most assuredly did not create the Tampa 2, was not a key coach on the great Tampa defenses, and did not consistently produce a great defense with the Bears.

Not a key coach? What are you basing that on? Their linebacker core was pretty good.

Obviously the head coach and D coordinator get more credit but to be specifically saying he wasnt a key coach seems odd.


Lovie was not responsible for devising Tampa's defensive scheme, implementing it, or formulating game strategy. His contributions were peripheral, not essential.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Was Bob Babich a key to the success when he coached the LBs?

LOvie is certainly better than Wannstandt or Romeo Crenell...but he's not a great coach...he's slightly above average ...like Jeff Fischer ...neither will win a SuperBowl as a head coach.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:58 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
312player wrote:
Was Bob Babich a key to the success when he coached the LBs?



Exactly. Who was the Bears' linebackers coach when they won the Superbowl? I'm not sure I've ever known. But you better damn well believe that EVERY Bears fan knows that Buddy Ryan was the architect of that defense.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Don Tiny wrote:
whoever might possibly have wrote:
crediting Tampa's success to Lovie


Hopefully the dumbest notion I'll read today ... it's early though ...

Not even close to the worst even in this thread...

Quote:
They had a GOAT at LB, a hall of very good at LB, a HOF CB, in early years an all star DT (albeit injury prone), and in later years a GOAT DE.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23844
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
It's also now a more "Why do Bears fans want Lovie to fail" thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
FavreFan wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
whoever might possibly have wrote:
crediting Tampa's success to Lovie


Hopefully the dumbest notion I'll read today ... it's early though ...

Not even close to the worst even in this thread...

Quote:
They had a GOAT at LB, a hall of very good at LB, a HOF CB, in early years an all star DT (albeit injury prone), and in later years a GOAT DE.

Yeah, Hank overshot on that one a bit


Briggs is a Hall of Very Good at the very least though. And Harris was an all star (pro bowler)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
FavreFan wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
whoever might possibly have wrote:
crediting Tampa's success to Lovie


Hopefully the dumbest notion I'll read today ... it's early though ...

Not even close to the worst even in this thread...

Quote:
They had a GOAT at LB, a hall of very good at LB, a HOF CB, in early years an all star DT (albeit injury prone), and in later years a GOAT DE.


I can't tell if that's more silly in regards to the 2005 or 1985 Bears ..... that said, derivative revisionism isn't as 'bad' as pure revisionism.

What we can all agree on, I think, is that 312 likely hasn't owned a television for about two decades.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
FavreFan wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
whoever might possibly have wrote:
crediting Tampa's success to Lovie


Hopefully the dumbest notion I'll read today ... it's early though ...

Not even close to the worst even in this thread...

Quote:
They had a GOAT at LB, a hall of very good at LB, a HOF CB, in early years an all star DT (albeit injury prone), and in later years a GOAT DE.


Urlacher, Briggs, Tillman, Harris and Peppers.

I'm not saying a true greatest of all time but people that can be in the discussion. Hell, Briggs might even worm his way into the HOF...

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:46 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
So the Bears were only great on defense because of those players?

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2014 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Nas wrote:
So the Bears were only great on defense because of those players?


Great? Yes, of course. I think if you put avg players in Urlacher, Briggs and Tillman's positions, Lovie fails and is fired within 3 seasons. He goes back to being a position coach or a def coord.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 230 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], The Doctor Of Style and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group