Chicago Fanatics Message Board • View topic

View unanswered posts | View active topics

Board index » CHICAGO AND NATIONAL TEAMS » CHICAGO BEARS

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Which pick was worse?

Page 1 of 1

[ 11 posts ]

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

America

Post subject: Which pick was worse?

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:40 pm

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis

White or Floyd?

Top

NME

Post subject: Re: Which pick was worse?

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:46 pm

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone

Hard to say without seeing either play. Both could still pan out in the long run.

Floyd was more of a reach imo

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?

Top

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater

Post subject: Re: Which pick was worse?

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:47 pm

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48803
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!

Floyd.

White, assuming he heals back to 100%, can play right now. He's good.

_________________
You know me like that.

Top

NME

Post subject: Re: Which pick was worse?

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:49 pm

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:

Floyd.

White, assuming he heals back to 100%, can play right now. He's good.

Not to mention, many people had White as a top-10 pick. Where as no one put Floyd there except apparently the Giants and Bears.

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?

Top

good dolphin

Post subject: Re: Which pick was worse?

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:52 pm

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82231

White would have been the top WR in this draft by a very big margin. He would have gone no lower than the #7 the Bears took him.

As an example, Will Fuller was a mid first round pick this year even with HUGE holes in his game but with speed similar to White.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.

Last edited by good dolphin on Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top

America

Post subject: Re: Which pick was worse?

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:55 pm

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis

I think giving up the 4th rounder was what tips it towards White, but I wouldn't be surprised at all they are both mediocre and Leonard finds a way to contribute slightly more than White does.

Top

312player

Post subject: Re: Which pick was worse?

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 6:12 pm

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's

NME wrote:

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:

Floyd.

White, assuming he heals back to 100%, can play right now. He's good.

Not to mention, many people had White as a top-10 pick. Where as no one put Floyd there except apparently the Giants and Bears.

Im not convinced the Giants would have got him, the Bears said the same BS about the Packers taking Shea with the next pick...maybe the Bears should start concentrating on their draft board and not listening to their competition rumored bs stories.

_________________

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:

Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.

Top

Edward Dickman

Post subject: Re: Which pick was worse?

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 6:21 pm

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:39 pm
Posts: 379
Location: Florida
pizza_Place: Dickman's

I'll let you know in 3 years.

Top

Edward Dickman

Post subject: Re: Which pick was worse?

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 6:22 pm

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 10:39 pm
Posts: 379
Location: Florida
pizza_Place: Dickman's

312player wrote:

NME wrote:

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:

Floyd.

White, assuming he heals back to 100%, can play right now. He's good.

Not to mention, many people had White as a top-10 pick. Where as no one put Floyd there except apparently the Giants and Bears.

100% absolutly correct.

Top

America

Post subject: Re: Which pick was worse?

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 6:26 pm

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:32 pm
Posts: 13865
Location: France
pizza_Place: Baranabyis

312player wrote:

NME wrote:

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:

Floyd.

White, assuming he heals back to 100%, can play right now. He's good.

Not to mention, many people had White as a top-10 pick. Where as no one put Floyd there except apparently the Giants and Bears.

Nice call. Giants probably heard that TB was going CB and built this ruse to trick some incompetent front office (Bears!) to give them the pick of the CB litter.

Top

NME

Post subject: Re: Which pick was worse?

Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 6:28 pm

Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 5084
Location: What buisness is it of yours, where I'm from
pizza_Place: Tombstone

312player wrote:

NME wrote:

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:

Floyd.

White, assuming he heals back to 100%, can play right now. He's good.

Not to mention, many people had White as a top-10 pick. Where as no one put Floyd there except apparently the Giants and Bears.

I guess we'll never truly know, but that Eli Apple selection sure looked like a panic pick to me personally lol

_________________
If the rule you followed lead you to this, of what use was the rule?

Top

Page 1 of 1

[ 11 posts ]

Which pick was worse?

Who is online