Irish Boy wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Anyone still think this defense is better without him playing?
So many people have been on his backside the last few years and acting like we would be better off if he were not on the team. How is that working out for you?
Also note that the two games that the defense was absoluely gashed on the ground (Cincy and Arizona) were the games that Tommy Harris wasn't playing.
Why do we turn on our own so readily in this city?
I often ask myself that question. Maybe it's because of two things:
1.) We deify players because of the hype built around them from the Chicago media (B & B to be exact). Then when these players turn out to be malcontents or play like shit after 1-2 great years we then are personnally offended and take issue or
2.) We suffer from second city disease (I do unapologetically). "We" want to be the top team in every sport and can't take the thought of rebuilding or suffering through a cycle of "blobdom". I know W_Z has no sympathy for Bears fans since his Saints have been bad for years. But man are they friggin' good now.
Boilermaker, I don't care how good he was/is, but don't say shit like that in the national press about your team and the struggling QB. Intelligence has not been one of Urlacher's strong points and that is glaringly obvious.