It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 8:39 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
That pass by Cutler in the first quarter did not appear to be tipped. That's ridiculous that Detroit could actually challenge whether it was tipped.

The Bears should have kicked the field goal in the first quarter and not blown the timeouts and challenges.

If not for a couple blown safety plays, how many yards would the Bears actually have given up?

Why didn't the Bears kick the field goal at the end of the game to attempt the onside with some time left?

The Lions are going to get smoked by Green Bay.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43570
Mini Ditka wrote:
Why didn't the Bears kick the field goal at the end of the game to attempt the onside with some time left?

I never understand why teams waste all that time trying to get a touchdown when they are down between 9 and 11 points. You need 2 scores (A TD & FG). Just take the FG when you are within range and then onside kick and hope for the best. Carolina did the same thing against the Bears last week, and it just makes zero sense. But all coaches follow this pattern, apparently.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 10:16 am
Posts: 20082
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Douchebag wrote:
Mini Ditka wrote:
Why didn't the Bears kick the field goal at the end of the game to attempt the onside with some time left?

I never understand why teams waste all that time trying to get a touchdown when they are down between 9 and 11 points. You need 2 scores (A TD & FG). Just take the FG when you are within range and then onside kick and hope for the best. Carolina did the same thing against the Bears last week, and it just makes zero sense. But all coaches follow this pattern, apparently.


It really makes no sense. The odds of getting the Onside kick arent that great to begin with, if you do get it you would like to still have some time on the clock.

_________________
drinky wrote:
If you hate Laurence, then don't listen - don't comment. When he co-hosts the B&B show, take that day off ... listen to an old podcast of a Bernstein solo show and jerk off all day.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Watch it again, it was definitely tipped. The nose of the ball is pointing straight, but then moves downward after hitting his hand... starting the wobbling.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82224
Mini Ditka wrote:
If not for a couple blown safety plays, how many yards would the Bears actually have given up?.


Who cares? They did give them up. This is Wannie logic.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
good dolphin wrote:
Mini Ditka wrote:
If not for a couple blown safety plays, how many yards would the Bears actually have given up?.


Who cares? They did give them up. This is Wannie logic.


If not for them scoring more points than the Bears, the Bears would have won the game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 4:12 pm
Posts: 1388
Location: Merrionette Park
pizza_Place: Nick&Vito's
I don't wanna! And you can't make me....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:01 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Mini Ditka wrote:
That pass by Cutler in the first quarter did not appear to be tipped. That's ridiculous that Detroit could actually challenge whether it was tipped.


how is the ability to challenge that any more ridiculous than being able to challenge if a receiver trapped the ball or had feet inbounds or a guys knee was down? it was an important play at the time that the officials were able to correct.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
man of few opinions wrote:
Mini Ditka wrote:
That pass by Cutler in the first quarter did not appear to be tipped. That's ridiculous that Detroit could actually challenge whether it was tipped.


how is the ability to challenge that any more ridiculous than being able to challenge if a receiver trapped the ball or had feet inbounds or a guys knee was down? it was an important play at the time that the officials were able to correct.


The difference is the concept of a challenge overturning a penalty. I have never once seen a challenge overturn a penalty ever.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:01 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Mini Ditka wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Mini Ditka wrote:
That pass by Cutler in the first quarter did not appear to be tipped. That's ridiculous that Detroit could actually challenge whether it was tipped.


how is the ability to challenge that any more ridiculous than being able to challenge if a receiver trapped the ball or had feet inbounds or a guys knee was down? it was an important play at the time that the officials were able to correct.


The difference is the concept of a challenge overturning a penalty. I have never once seen a challenge overturn a penalty ever.


and you still haven't.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43570
Big Chicagoan wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Mini Ditka wrote:
If not for a couple blown safety plays, how many yards would the Bears actually have given up?.


Who cares? They did give them up. This is Wannie logic.


If not for them scoring more points than the Bears, the Bears would have won the game.

That is Tim McCarver logic.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
man of few opinions wrote:
Mini Ditka wrote:
The difference is the concept of a challenge overturning a penalty. I have never once seen a challenge overturn a penalty ever.


and you still haven't.


It was clearly pass interference but because they were able to challenge the tipping of the ball the penalty was overturned. The penalty was overturned indirectly.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Last edited by Mini Ditka on Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
Someone needs to get their ass Tice'd

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:32 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Mini Ditka wrote:
man of few opinions wrote:
Mini Ditka wrote:
The difference is the concept of a challenge overturning a penalty. I have never once seen a challenge overturn a penalty ever.


and you still haven't.


It was clearly pass interference but because they were able to challenge the tipping of the ball the penalty was overturned. The penalty was overturned indirectly.

works for me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
good dolphin wrote:
Mini Ditka wrote:
If not for a couple blown safety plays, how many yards would the Bears actually have given up?.


Who cares? They did give them up. This is Wannie logic.


It does make a difference to understand where the problem on the defense is. It's clearly safety and defensive line.

As much as people are jumping on the Lion's bandwagon I don't think they are significantly better than the Bears. If you put Calvin Johnson on the Bears with an offensive line Cutler throws for 3 TDs in last night's game easy.

Is it time for the Bears to get rid of Devin Hester? He seems like he just keeps messing things up as a receiver and a returner.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:37 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:42 pm
Posts: 7298
Location: Land of Lincoln
pizza_Place: Tombstone
Mini Ditka wrote:
As much as people are jumping on the Lion's bandwagon I don't think they are significantly better than the Bears. If you put Calvin Johnson on the Bears with an offensive line Cutler throws for 3 TDs in last night's game easy.


you like to play the "what if" game a lot.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 10:08 am
Posts: 14018
Location: Underneath the Grace of Timothy Richard Tebow
pizza_Place: ------
man of few opinions wrote:
Mini Ditka wrote:
As much as people are jumping on the Lion's bandwagon I don't think they are significantly better than the Bears. If you put Calvin Johnson on the Bears with an offensive line Cutler throws for 3 TDs in last night's game easy.


you like to play the "what if" game a lot.

[pause]
Harry Caray: Hey! Now Ken, we all know that the moon is not made of green cheese.
Ken Waller: Yes, that's true Harry.
Harry Caray: But what if it were made of barbeque spare ribs, would you eat it then?
Ken Waller: What?
Harry Caray: I know I would. Heck! I'd have seconds and then polish it off with a tall cool Budweiser. - - - I would do it. Would you?
Ken Waller: I'm confused.
Harry Caray: It's a simple question Dr, would you eat the moon if it were made of ribs?
Ken Waller: I don't know how to answer that.
Harry Caray: It's not rocket science, just say yes and we'll move on.
Ken Waller: Yes.
Harry Caray: Hey! How about this mad cow disease?
Ken Waller: What about it?
Harry Caray: Well, it was here for a while and then it went away. Your thoughts.
Ken Waller: Yes, yes it was in the news for a while and then it disappeared from the news.
Harry Caray: Good point. Gee I hope I never get it. Hey! What about this: if you had to choose between being the top scientist in your field or getting mad cow disease, what would it be?
Ken Waller: Well of course I would choose to be the top scientist in my field.
Harry Caray: Oh good. I was worried you'd choose mad cow.
Ken Waller: Why would you think that?
Harry Caray: I guess I'm just a worrier, that's why my friends call me whiskers.
Ken Waller: I thought you said your friends call you whiskers cause you were curious as a cat.
Harry Caray: Well Dr. Waller it has been a pleasure. We've covered a lot of ground, shared a few laughs, thanks for coming on.
Ken Waller: My pleasure Harry.
Harry Caray: He's a good kid. That's all the time we have. Join us next week with our guest Albert Einstein. What? Well apparently Albert Einstein died 42 years ago. You know what, we'll try to get him anyway. See you next time. Cubs win! Cubs win!

_________________
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rpb is wrong. Phil McCracken is useful.

Chus wrote:
RPB is right. You suck. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82224
man of few opinions wrote:
Mini Ditka wrote:
As much as people are jumping on the Lion's bandwagon I don't think they are significantly better than the Bears. If you put Calvin Johnson on the Bears with an offensive line Cutler throws for 3 TDs in last night's game easy.


you like to play the "what if" game a lot.


I used to like to play the "just the tip" game as a youngster.

I agree with Ditka that the Lions are not significantly better than the Bears and it would not be even a slight shock for them to split their year series.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 2:55 pm
Posts: 3392
I don't there are that many elite teams out there. As bad as the Bears have played they could still make the playoffs as a wildcard if they can get some decent o-line and safety play.

_________________
To the Jews who had believed him, Jesus said, “If you hold to my teaching, you are really my disciples. Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:49 pm
Posts: 121
pizza_Place: My guy tells me Little Caesars is the best.
Mini Ditka wrote:
I don't there are that many elite teams out there. As bad as the Bears have played they could still make the playoffs as a wildcard if they can get some decent o-line and safety play.


As bad as the NFC is, it is possible that both wild card teams could come from the NFC North, but the Lions & Falcons are my wild card favorites.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37836
Location: ...
the falcons suck this year and they've got a tougher season. the bucs have a better chance at the wildcard than the bears do but they play in a tougher division.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: a retard and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group