I remember watching the All-Star game when he won MVP honors and his prize was a Ram truck I think. The MVP was voted after the 2nd period so the deserving winner I believe Khabi went flawless 20-20 in the 3rd got robbed. Fucking ass backward NHL
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Eric Daze https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=86630 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 1:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Eric Daze |
For all of you "new" hockey fans, he played for the Hawks once upon a time. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 1:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
Seacrest wrote: For all of you "new" hockey fans, he played for the Hawks once upon a time. You're being generous. |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 1:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
Averaged 22 goals a year for them while he played . He wasn't a bad player, hurt a lot and maybe a little soft but a pretty decent 2nd line winger. Sullivan , Nylander , and him were a pretty good line offensively. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 1:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
Id guess most New fans remember Daze. He was "the guy" for a season or two wasnt he? |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 1:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
rogers park bryan wrote: Id guess most New fans remember Daze. He was "the guy" for a season or two wasnt he? Yes he was. Let that settle in a for a minute... |
|
| Author: | DannyB [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 1:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
His jersey number 55 was briefly displayed during that weird video tribute they had a few nights ago. He apparently still lives in the area and enjoys spending time with his family. |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 1:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
spanky wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Id guess most New fans remember Daze. He was "the guy" for a season or two wasnt he? Yes he was. Let that settle in a for a minute... He's a more talented Bryan Bickell and there's no shortage of love for him. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
I remember watching the All-Star game when he won MVP honors and his prize was a Ram truck I think. The MVP was voted after the 2nd period so the deserving winner I believe Khabi went flawless 20-20 in the 3rd got robbed. Fucking ass backward NHL
|
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
badrogue17 wrote: spanky wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Id guess most New fans remember Daze. He was "the guy" for a season or two wasnt he? Yes he was. Let that settle in a for a minute... He's a more talented Bryan Bickell and there's no shortage of love for him. He had a really bad back and wasn't 1/10 as tough as Bickell. |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 2:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
spanky wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Id guess most New fans remember Daze. He was "the guy" for a season or two wasnt he? Yes he was. Let that settle in a for a minute... Along with the original Theo. He still plays every week with Steve Maltais, Brian Noonan and others at the Edge. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 3:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
Seacrest wrote: He still plays every week with Steve Maltais, Brian Noonan and others at the Edge. 
|
|
| Author: | billypootons [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 3:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
can you give any context on where/why you saw him? i remember him mostly because he was on the hawks in the NHL 96 video game I used to play. |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 4:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
billypootons wrote: can you give any context on where/why you saw him? i remember him mostly because he was on the hawks in the NHL 96 video game I used to play. The Edge in Bensenville. |
|
| Author: | Crystal Lake Hoffy [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 5:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
He had some great moments as a Blackhawk. That said, he was labeled as soft, whether or not he deserved it, and his back was a problem. Too bad he didn't play in this era. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 5:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote: He had some great moments as a Blackhawk. That said, he was labeled as soft, whether or not he deserved it, and his back was a problem. Too bad he didn't play in this era. He would have been good now you are right. Fans mistakenly wanted him to be like Secord was or something dues to his size. |
|
| Author: | DannyB [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
Dude was a legit 6'6" and had a cro-magnon quality about him. It wasn't meant to be. Andre the Giant had just as good of a chance. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 8:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
He was not good. The fact he was one of the Hawks best players for years is a terrible, terrible comment about this organization at the time. Those Hawks teams were loaded.............with lots of guys that had no business being in the NHL. |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
spanky wrote: He was not good. The fact he was one of the Hawks best players for years is a terrible, terrible comment about this organization at the time. Those Hawks teams were loaded.............with lots of guys that had no business being in the NHL.  Its bad that a 4 time 30 goal scorer during the dead puck era was one of your best players? You're a hard guy to impress. He wasn't great but you're acting like he was Ryan Vandenbussche or Jim Cummins .
|
|
| Author: | spanky [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
badrogue17 wrote: spanky wrote: He was not good. The fact he was one of the Hawks best players for years is a terrible, terrible comment about this organization at the time. Those Hawks teams were loaded.............with lots of guys that had no business being in the NHL. Its bad that a 4 time 30 goal scorer during the dead puck era was one of your best players? You're a hard guy to impress. He wasn't great but you're acting like he was Ryan Vandenbussche or Jim Cummins .Good job naming a couple of bums. Somebody had to score, I guess it was him. The "best" players on bad teams are often.......still bad in the grand scheme of things. Sometimes they even have decent stats! He was bad. Easily impressed I guess. You're acting like he was Teemu Selanne or Brett Hull. |
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
If he wasn't always injured he would have been one of the greats. Daze was pretty Damn good but the ouchieness roont him. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
badrogue17 wrote: spanky wrote: He was not good. The fact he was one of the Hawks best players for years is a terrible, terrible comment about this organization at the time. Those Hawks teams were loaded.............with lots of guys that had no business being in the NHL. Its bad that a 4 time 30 goal scorer during the dead puck era was one of your best players? You're a hard guy to impress. He wasn't great but you're acting like he was Ryan Vandenbussche or Jim Cummins .Phil Kessel scored 37 this year and has been Toronto's best player for years........ Look where that got them. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
badrogue17 wrote: during the dead puck era Not sure what this means, either. 28 guys scored more goals than Daze in 00-01 when he got 33. Including his teammate Sullivan. |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
spanky wrote: badrogue17 wrote: spanky wrote: He was not good. The fact he was one of the Hawks best players for years is a terrible, terrible comment about this organization at the time. Those Hawks teams were loaded.............with lots of guys that had no business being in the NHL. Its bad that a 4 time 30 goal scorer during the dead puck era was one of your best players? You're a hard guy to impress. He wasn't great but you're acting like he was Ryan Vandenbussche or Jim Cummins .Phil Kessel scored 37 this year and has been Toronto's best player for years........ Look where that got them. So Phil Kessel is a bad player in your eyes? |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
Here Ill keep it simple. If you think Eric Daze was a bad player, you're wrong. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
badrogue17 wrote: spanky wrote: badrogue17 wrote: spanky wrote: He was not good. The fact he was one of the Hawks best players for years is a terrible, terrible comment about this organization at the time. Those Hawks teams were loaded.............with lots of guys that had no business being in the NHL. Its bad that a 4 time 30 goal scorer during the dead puck era was one of your best players? You're a hard guy to impress. He wasn't great but you're acting like he was Ryan Vandenbussche or Jim Cummins .Phil Kessel scored 37 this year and has been Toronto's best player for years........ Look where that got them. So Phil Kessel is a bad player in your eyes? He's a decent player on a terrible team....year after year after year. And he doesn't have a bad back. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
badrogue17 wrote: Here Ill keep it simple. If you think Eric Daze was a bad player, you're wrong. 
|
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
He was not a bad player. That's just silly. Karpotsev. Now that's a bad player. Fucking fuck. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
badrogue17 wrote: Here Ill keep it simple. If you think Eric Daze was a bad player, you're wrong. So...by your own standards, he was the 2nd best player on his regular line - and they were a terrible team....and I'm the one that is wrong? |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
Darkside wrote: He was not a bad player. That's just silly. Karpotsev. Now that's a bad player. Fucking fuck. That's a different animal. He's one of the guys that had no business being on an NHL team that I was talking about earlier. The Hawks loved those guys back then. |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Wed Apr 30, 2014 9:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Eric Daze |
spanky wrote: badrogue17 wrote: Here Ill keep it simple. If you think Eric Daze was a bad player, you're wrong. So...by your own standards, he was the 2nd best player on his regular line - and they were a terrible team....and I'm the one that is wrong? Yep, you're wrong. Its ok, it happens a lot. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|