It is currently Fri Nov 29, 2024 11:33 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: NIKE
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:33 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Nike decides to stick with Tiger Woods after he admits to cheating on his wife with a gaggle of women, only to ditch Lance Armstrong immediately after any indication that he used PED's.

Kevin Adler from Engage Marketing said it best:

Quote:
“Where the line seems to be drawn for Nike, as an authentic sports-performance brand, is when your transgressions are [related] to the integrity of your performance as an elite athlete,” Kevin Adler, founder of Chicago-based marketing agency, Engage Marketing, told us by phone on Thursday. “That’s really an important distinction and a very stark contrast between Nike making the decision to stand by Tiger and choosing to disassociate itself from Lance.”


This makes sense. Lance Armstrong cheated to achieve his success in biking and Tiger Woods did not cheat ... to achieve his success in golf. In one case a crime was committed, not in the other.

But what about Alex Rodriguez? He's an admitted former steroid-user yet NIKE remains faithful to his sponsorship. Here are NIKE's comments in 2009 regarding A-Rod:

Quote:
"Nike does not condone the use of illegal substances in sport and agrees with Alex Rodriguez that they should not be used. We will have no further comment at this time."


And here is what NIKE said about Armstrong:

Quote:
"Due to the seemingly insurmountable evidence that Lance Armstrong participated in doping and misled Nike for more than a decade, it is with great sadness that we have terminated our contract with him. Nike does not condone the use of illegal performance enhancing drugs in any manner."


So much for consistency.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NIKE
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Tiger will make them money, Lance will not.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NIKE
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:39 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Armstrong made plenty of money for NIKE over the course of a decade. The real reason NIKE fired Armstrong was twofold:

1) They felt "misled".

2) Armstrong's contract was near its end.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NIKE
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
Right. Tiger continues to make them money. Lance would not, even if his contract wasn't done. They are a business.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NIKE
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:43 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Is your point that people would stop buying LIVESTRONG apparel that also featured the NIKE swoosh because of his admission?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NIKE
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:29 am
Posts: 8116
Location: South Elgin
pizza_Place: Ian's Pizza
No idea on specifics. My opinion is simply that Lance no longer is a positive business relationship for Nike that would result in revenue (or positive marketing).


Despite Tiger's shit, he still makes Nike money. I don't think Lance would make them money anymore.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NIKE
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Armstrong made plenty of money for NIKE over the course of a decade. The real reason NIKE fired Armstrong was twofold:

1) They felt "misled".

2) Armstrong's contract was near its end.

I'm not sure if they were misled. I don't care about this story really but I thought I heard, probably from B&B, that there was reports of Nike possibly helping him actually acquire the drugs or something like that.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NIKE
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 10:10 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
FavreFan wrote:
I'm not sure if they were misled. I don't care about this story really but I thought I heard, probably from B&B, that there was reports of Nike possibly helping him actually acquire the drugs or something like that.


You're probably right, as I have also heard similar reports. Whether or not they were truly "misled" may be up for argument. I was basing my rationale behind their official statement:

"Due to the seemingly insurmountable evidence that Lance Armstrong participated in doping and misled Nike for more than a decade, it is with great sadness that we have terminated our contract with him. Nike does not condone the use of illegal performance enhancing drugs in any manner."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NIKE
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 8:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38710
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I can no longer look at my Tag Heuer watch without thinking of Perkins, so thanks for that Tiger you fuckbag.

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NIKE
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 8:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Denied, they are a successful corporation who milked Armstrong for everything they could get and dumped him when there was nothing left to gain...they will dump Aroid too soon...Woods is still bringing in the $

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NIKE
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 8:45 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79592
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
badrogue17 wrote:
I can no longer look at my Tag Heuer watch without thinking of Perkins, so thanks for that Tiger you fuckbag.


I went home with the waitress
The way I always do
How was I to know
She worked for Deadspin too?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NIKE
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 8:57 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38387
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
A-Rod was forced to admit it when he was outed.

Tiger was also.

Lance is still holding on past the expiration date of his bullshit.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: NIKE
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37847
Location: ...
Just Prove It.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group