It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 11:44 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 5:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
https://www.reddit.com/r/science/commen ... d_a_study/

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 7:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82231
Darkside wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The guy was a dick to my son at the White House Christmas party. Fuck him right in his black hole

Details?


My brother took my oldest boy. Bill Nye was there. It was just a party so he had no formal role other than to attend. 99% of the room wouldn't know him from a hole in the wall. My son did so he walked up to him, just like you would anyone at a party and introduced himself. He asked if he could get a picture. Nye big timed him. He didn't say he couldn't have a picture but he seemed offput by the suggestion. My brother took the picture as they were talking anyway.

The guy was not because he is Bill Nye super American. He is there because he is BILL NYE SCIENCE GUY, educator of children and a child who looks up to him is showing him interest. Pretty poor form.

Anyway, science guy isn't really a scientist. He is a smart guy who dabbles in things and advocates the positions others create. There is nothing wrong with it but he is really more entertainer than scientist.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 8:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 2:25 pm
Posts: 4272
pizza_Place: pizza and subs
Bill Nye Verified account ‏@BillNye

Heading down to DC to catch an #EarthDay flight on Air Force One tomorrow with the President. We're going to #ActOnClimate.


this makes sense.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6848
IkeSouth wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/4f6f6g/science_ama_series_we_just_published_a_study/

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/05/30/global-warming-alarmists-caught-doctoring-97-percent-consensus-claims/#6ef8d1225909

Your Reddit page is led by John Cook and his 97% claim has already been debunked as a con job.
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/10/29/cooks-97-scam-debunked/
Quote:
Jose Duarte, expert in Social Psychology, Scientific Validity, and Research Methods, has actually called the Cook paper “multiply fraudulent”, and, as far as I know, Cook has taken no action to challenge the claim. This, as much as anything else, shows just what a con trick the whole business was. How many scientists, after all, would accept being called fraudulent without taking action?


Quote:
Cook and his colleagues were intent upon providing an eye-catching “consensus” which they could sell to the media, and which would be picked up by politicians and others in the establishment, regardless of what the evidence actually said.

The reality is starkly different. After searching through 12000 scientific papers, spread over 20 years, all they could only come up with was 65 which supported the supposed consensus.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 8:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Juiced wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/4f6f6g/science_ama_series_we_just_published_a_study/

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/05/30/global-warming-alarmists-caught-doctoring-97-percent-consensus-claims/#6ef8d1225909

Your Reddit page is led by John Cook and his 97% claim has already been debunked as a con job.
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/10/29/cooks-97-scam-debunked/
Quote:
Jose Duarte, expert in Social Psychology, Scientific Validity, and Research Methods, has actually called the Cook paper “multiply fraudulent”, and, as far as I know, Cook has taken no action to challenge the claim. This, as much as anything else, shows just what a con trick the whole business was. How many scientists, after all, would accept being called fraudulent without taking action?


Quote:
Cook and his colleagues were intent upon providing an eye-catching “consensus” which they could sell to the media, and which would be picked up by politicians and others in the establishment, regardless of what the evidence actually said.

The reality is starkly different. After searching through 12000 scientific papers, spread over 20 years, all they could only come up with was 65 which supported the supposed consensus.


I heard it was 62. www.globalclimatescam.com

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 6848
IkeSouth wrote:
holy shit....... bill is right as fuck. read what he said. understand what he means. tobacco was proven to be dangerous. people deserved to be prosecuted for downplaying it. even if they didnt know it at the time, it was actually dangerous and prosecution was the only way to prevent more deaths.

climate change, on the other hand, EVERYONE FUCKING KNOWS IT. 99% OF SCIENTISTS AGREE. THIS IS FACT. THOSE WHO DOWNPLAY IT ARE NOT SCIENTISTS, THEY ARE EVIL. AND STUPID, BUT STUPID AND EVIL GO HAND AND HAND.


Image


Ut-oh! Ike, Better stop smoking that weed. 99% of scientist agree. This is a fact!
Quote:
Marijuana, hue notwithstanding, is not exactly new school green. In fact, it's the worst drug for the environment. Marijuana growers use $5 billion worth of electricity to power lightbulbs, fans, dehumidifiers and whatever else it takes to grow weed. That's 1% of the national electricity consumption.

Not only that, smoking a joint is worth two pounds of carbon dioxide emissions. Who knew getting high could have such environmental consequences!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
hnd wrote:
Bill Nye Verified account ‏@BillNye

Heading down to DC to catch an #EarthDay flight on Air Force One tomorrow with the President. We're going to #ActOnClimate.


this makes sense.

:lol: :lol:

That's a real tweet?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 7:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
good dolphin wrote:
Darkside wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The guy was a dick to my son at the White House Christmas party. Fuck him right in his black hole

Details?


My brother took my oldest boy. Bill Nye was there. It was just a party so he had no formal role other than to attend. 99% of the room wouldn't know him from a hole in the wall. My son did so he walked up to him, just like you would anyone at a party and introduced himself. He asked if he could get a picture. Nye big timed him. He didn't say he couldn't have a picture but he seemed offput by the suggestion. My brother took the picture as they were talking anyway.

The guy was not because he is Bill Nye super American. He is there because he is BILL NYE SCIENCE GUY, educator of children and a child who looks up to him is showing him interest. Pretty poor form.

Anyway, science guy isn't really a scientist. He is a smart guy who dabbles in things and advocates the positions others create. There is nothing wrong with it but he is really more entertainer than scientist.


well you should take into account who raised the kid

and he is a real mechanical engineer... which is kinda like science and shit

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Last edited by IkeSouth on Mon Apr 18, 2016 7:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Juiced wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
holy shit....... bill is right as fuck. read what he said. understand what he means. tobacco was proven to be dangerous. people deserved to be prosecuted for downplaying it. even if they didnt know it at the time, it was actually dangerous and prosecution was the only way to prevent more deaths.

climate change, on the other hand, EVERYONE FUCKING KNOWS IT. 99% OF SCIENTISTS AGREE. THIS IS FACT. THOSE WHO DOWNPLAY IT ARE NOT SCIENTISTS, THEY ARE EVIL. AND STUPID, BUT STUPID AND EVIL GO HAND AND HAND.


Image


Ut-oh! Ike, Better stop smoking that weed. 99% of scientist agree. This is a fact!
Quote:
Marijuana, hue notwithstanding, is not exactly new school green. In fact, it's the worst drug for the environment. Marijuana growers use $5 billion worth of electricity to power lightbulbs, fans, dehumidifiers and whatever else it takes to grow weed. That's 1% of the national electricity consumption.

Not only that, smoking a joint is worth two pounds of carbon dioxide emissions. Who knew getting high could have such environmental consequences!


grow it outdoors and vape that shit #problemsolvers

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2016 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:25 pm
Posts: 27055
Juiced wrote:
IkeSouth wrote:
https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/4f6f6g/science_ama_series_we_just_published_a_study/

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2013/05/30/global-warming-alarmists-caught-doctoring-97-percent-consensus-claims/#6ef8d1225909

Your Reddit page is led by John Cook and his 97% claim has already been debunked as a con job.
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2015/10/29/cooks-97-scam-debunked/
Quote:
Jose Duarte, expert in Social Psychology, Scientific Validity, and Research Methods, has actually called the Cook paper “multiply fraudulent”, and, as far as I know, Cook has taken no action to challenge the claim. This, as much as anything else, shows just what a con trick the whole business was. How many scientists, after all, would accept being called fraudulent without taking action?


Quote:
Cook and his colleagues were intent upon providing an eye-catching “consensus” which they could sell to the media, and which would be picked up by politicians and others in the establishment, regardless of what the evidence actually said.

The reality is starkly different. After searching through 12000 scientific papers, spread over 20 years, all they could only come up with was 65 which supported the supposed consensus.


lol, spread over 20 years? where is the consensus from the last decade?

_________________
the world will always the world. your entire existence is defined by your response.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group