Curious Hair wrote:
Jezebel e-spilling an e-lot of e-ink to say "look, she's not a sexual predator, she's just a writer who fails to express herself clearly and thoughtfully because she's such a coddled brat!"
Best part of that article is the Jezebel/Gawker commentariat calling the writer out on her bullshit:
Quote:
Why are we acting like this is only about her touching her 1 year old sister's vagina when she was 7 and not also about emotionally coercing her sister into sleeping in her bed and then masturbating while she sleeps? And about paying her sister in candy to give her long kisses on the lips? And about paying her sister in quarters to let her put 'biker chick' makeup on her and calling her 'sexual property'? And about watching whatever her little sister wants as long as her sister would 'relax on her' while they watched tv? Why are we pretending this is about once incident and not a decade of behavior documented by Dunham in her own book? You're leaving a lot out, and I'm not sure why.