It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 7:52 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 22576
pizza_Place: Giordano's
spmack wrote:
Keyana Jones noticed that Julie DiCaro lost thousands of followers in the past week or so....wonder if this is related, somehow?


3K follower jumps over a two-day span are pretty hard to come by for part time nighttime radio hosts with middling Patreon accounts, I would assume.

Image

Also lost a thousand or so over the last 30 days.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:19 am
Posts: 23915
pizza_Place: Jimmy's Place
312player wrote:
North has got like 200k followers..gotta be another one.


352K followers and his last tweet got 2 likes -- one of them his own!. :lol:

_________________
Reality is your friend, not your enemy. -- Seacrest


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92102
Location: To the left of my post
I don't see the big deal besides it being worthy of laughing at a person for it.

Like half of all social media accounts are bots, fake accounts or inactives. If you want to pay some company to follow you then go ahead and waste your money.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't see the big deal besides it being worthy of laughing at a person for it.

Like half of all social media accounts are bots, fake accounts or inactives. If you want to pay some company to follow you then go ahead and waste your money.


i realize FB commenters are basically the lowest wrung of society, but I love when people will be arguing with someone that's clearly a fake profile/bot


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92102
Location: To the left of my post
Bagels wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't see the big deal besides it being worthy of laughing at a person for it.

Like half of all social media accounts are bots, fake accounts or inactives. If you want to pay some company to follow you then go ahead and waste your money.


i realize FB commenters are basically the lowest wrung of society, but I love when people will be arguing with someone that's clearly a fake profile/bot
That's why JORR ignores DannyB.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't see the big deal besides it being worthy of laughing at a person for it.

Like half of all social media accounts are bots, fake accounts or inactives. If you want to pay some company to follow you then go ahead and waste your money.



Part of contracts with papers are social media things. More than likely, his contract is tied to his followers/growth of his account. By paying for them, he is basically skirting the requirements of his contract.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:50 am
Posts: 11242
Location: Schaumburg
pizza_Place: Palermo's
312player wrote:
C_Howitt_Fealz wrote:
Why would you need to buy Twitter followers anyways?



I don't have twitter but I'd assume they think - more folloers equals more credibility.


I can see advertisers being upset if they are paying a certain amount based on how many followers someone has thinking their commercials will reach x number of people when they are really reaching much less than that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41378
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
I guess Roeper got busted when he was re-tweeted by Roger Ebert.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't see the big deal besides it being worthy of laughing at a person for it.

Like half of all social media accounts are bots, fake accounts or inactives. If you want to pay some company to follow you then go ahead and waste your money.


Right. It's not a "scandal" or anything.

It's just dumb.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 55968
pizza_Place: Barstool One Bite Frozen
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
3K follower jumps over a two-day span are pretty hard to come by for part time nighttime radio hosts with middling Patreon accounts, I would assume.


2,999 of them were Keyana Jones alts in case one got blocked.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Caller Bob wrote:
I guess Roeper got busted when he was re-tweeted by Roger Ebert.


I'm sure it was jaw-dropping to see that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:27 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79588
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't see the big deal besides it being worthy of laughing at a person for it.

Like half of all social media accounts are bots, fake accounts or inactives. If you want to pay some company to follow you then go ahead and waste your money.


Right. It's not a "scandal" or anything.

It's just dumb.



I think it is a scandal though when you're supposed to be a journalist. And Roeper was about to start writing a column again. It may not be such a big deal for a movie critic who wants to raise his profile or a business or even for a political campaign that is trying to reach as many eyeballs as possible. But for someone who considers himself a journalist, it calls his credibility into question.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't see the big deal besides it being worthy of laughing at a person for it.

Like half of all social media accounts are bots, fake accounts or inactives. If you want to pay some company to follow you then go ahead and waste your money.


Right. It's not a "scandal" or anything.

It's just dumb.



I think it is a scandal though when you're supposed to be a journalist. And Roeper was about to start writing a column again. It may not be such a big deal for a movie critic who wants to raise his profile or a business or even for a political campaign that is trying to reach as many eyeballs as possible. But for someone who considers himself a journalist, it calls his credibility into question.


The fact that Twitter followers or YouTube subscribers is important to anyone in any professional manner is why They hate us.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:50 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79588
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't see the big deal besides it being worthy of laughing at a person for it.

Like half of all social media accounts are bots, fake accounts or inactives. If you want to pay some company to follow you then go ahead and waste your money.


Right. It's not a "scandal" or anything.

It's just dumb.



I think it is a scandal though when you're supposed to be a journalist. And Roeper was about to start writing a column again. It may not be such a big deal for a movie critic who wants to raise his profile or a business or even for a political campaign that is trying to reach as many eyeballs as possible. But for someone who considers himself a journalist, it calls his credibility into question.


The fact that Twitter followers or YouTube subscribers is important to anyone in any professional manner is why They hate us.


Yeah, the rules on this stuff are being written as we go. Especially with regard to media, individuals are positioning themselves as a brand unto themselves rather than, in Roeper's case for example, an employee of the Chicago Sun-Times. I believe that li'l danny advised his protegee Sir Larry to drop the "670" from his Twitter handle for that exact reason.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 2:25 pm
Posts: 4272
pizza_Place: pizza and subs
we were about to pay for a company to increase our clicks and follows on fb for our company. they said it was all legitimate. we found a local company that used them and he showed up and showed us how like all the follows and clicks were from indonesia and other countries. basically its a "hey i have alot of followers thus must be legit" type of a thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 1:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92102
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't see the big deal besides it being worthy of laughing at a person for it.

Like half of all social media accounts are bots, fake accounts or inactives. If you want to pay some company to follow you then go ahead and waste your money.


Right. It's not a "scandal" or anything.

It's just dumb.



I think it is a scandal though when you're supposed to be a journalist. And Roeper was about to start writing a column again. It may not be such a big deal for a movie critic who wants to raise his profile or a business or even for a political campaign that is trying to reach as many eyeballs as possible. But for someone who considers himself a journalist, it calls his credibility into question.
It may call his popularity into question but credibility in journalism shouldn't be how many twitter followers you have.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 38636
Location: RST Video
pizza_Place: Bill's Pizza - Mundelein
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
I guess Roeper got busted when he was re-tweeted by Roger Ebert.


I'm sure it was jaw-dropping to see that.


Image

_________________
Darkside wrote:
Our hotel smelled like dead hooker vagina (before you ask I had gotten a detailed description from beardown)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 2:01 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79588
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I don't see the big deal besides it being worthy of laughing at a person for it.

Like half of all social media accounts are bots, fake accounts or inactives. If you want to pay some company to follow you then go ahead and waste your money.


Right. It's not a "scandal" or anything.

It's just dumb.



I think it is a scandal though when you're supposed to be a journalist. And Roeper was about to start writing a column again. It may not be such a big deal for a movie critic who wants to raise his profile or a business or even for a political campaign that is trying to reach as many eyeballs as possible. But for someone who considers himself a journalist, it calls his credibility into question.
It may call his popularity into question but credibility in journalism shouldn't be how many twitter followers you have.



It's not that you gain credibility by having Twitter followers. It's that you lose it by faking phony ones.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 2:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 11:54 pm
Posts: 13340
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
I guess Roeper got busted when he was re-tweeted by Roger Ebert.


I'm sure it was jaw-dropping to see that.


Image

_________________
Sherman remarked, "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day, haven't we?" Grant looked up. "Yes," he replied, followed by a puff. "Yes. Lick 'em tomorrow, though."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Roeper
PostPosted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 2:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 4:26 pm
Posts: 31155
Location: West Side
pizza_Place: Paisan's in Cicero
I believe the other issue is that the company that Roeper apparently used created bot accounts in a "catfishy" way in which they use the name and likeness of someone without permission, but change the name ever-so-slightly (like Beardown and Beerdown).

Could be another layer in fraud.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
I rarely troll.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group