Frank Coztansa wrote:
Better? With the Cubs, it seems that the 'better' one is the one which suits the argument best. I have seen MANY posts about Almora leading or being second in the NL in batting average.
His OB% barely cracks the top twenty.
Given a large enough sample size of plate appearances, its probably good to look at both stats as they will both tell you part of the story.
Just like looking at a starting pitcher's W-L record over a large number of starts will tell you about a pitcher. Lesson #1 is free for you there, IMU.
Well, one of the stats includes the entirety of the other stat.
One of them completely disregards the other.
Ill go with the all inclusive one. OBP is a better stat, there is no debating that.
of course you can debate the point depending on what exactly you are trying to analyze
The Moneyball statement that "we don't care how a person gets on base" isn't exactly true, especially for a guy who frequently gets beyond first base when he does get on base.