Nardi wrote:
long time guy wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
long time guy wrote:
If it were as provincial as Brick keeps suggesting then why hasn't there been interest in DePaul basketball for the better part of 25 years?
I say this as a guy that can remember a time (bet Brick can't) when Depaul basketball was bigger in this city than the Chicago Bulls.
Well, Minnesota football was once the dominant football team in the country. Times change and there are a lot of reasons why other teams may have passed them.
long time guy wrote:
Why isn't there interest in St. John's?. Its obvious. When they stopped paying for iconic players no one much cared about them any longer.
Are you just randomly naming teams now? Do I have to give you a list of every team in the country and why they are what they are?
St Johns was never a national power either but their decline, like most but not all of the non-football schools, has a lot to do with that too.
St. John's was a national power during the 80's. You don't know what you are talking about. Why? because they played a ton of nationally televised games. When they churned out NBA caliber players more people cared about them. If you think that people care about college basketball simply because its college basketball then you are mistaken. People care about watching quality college basketball teams play. I can give you a myriad of teams that were relevant 20-30 years that aren't (GT anyone) simply because they do not have star players anymore.
Again you don't know what you are talking about.
You and Jemele are proposing to the elite athlete, Just Do It. and you expect them to come running. Why would they come running? There a a dozen reasons they wouldn't and from what I can tell, one one that they would. And the one reason is certainly against theirs and their family's self interests. Philanthropy is for those that are already successful.
Which actually acknowledges the problem I have with those so aggrieved by her column. DePaul was paying well long ago, Kentucky, UNC, Louisville, Arizona & Auburn are getting caught at it now. It's proof of the flawed system and now if only to disrupt television & shoe company money
Hill offers up a choice for some kids & schools that otherwise have been proven to largely have their better educational interests at heart. She's not demanding anything of the elite athlete, just suggesting something many fed up with this entirely corrupt system have murmured about for years. And imo, the reflexive outrage/furor is misplaced, if not completely hypocritical.
It's a completely monopolistic system aided and abetted by the NCAA, major media & shoe companies. That it's so dirty to it's core, yet her clear intent is seemingly being so twisted to defend it is sad imo.
It kind of reminds me of the mid/late 80's & the U. Rotten to the core, but it made boosters feel good & admission applications skyrocket. Bring in the money to what used to be a sleepy school with a crap program and all will be largely overlooked. Until it couldn't be.
In comparison to a dirty national power in basketball at that time, UNLV. Where the games were too late for tv ratings, where the coach thumbed his nose to the "respectables", and yet they were always being hit by the NCAA for fear that they'd disrupt the status quo.