It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 6:33 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 255 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:31 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 4:47 pm
Posts: 28634
Location: computer
pizza_Place: Salerno's
You cannot assume that all people should know that you do not swim or wade in fresh water in Florida.
....unless it's a pool, and even then you better check for an alligator first.

Disney should not have beach access to the lagoons. I thought it was stupid when I saw them in April 2015....walked that whole area.

_________________
@audioidkid
spaulding wrote:
Also if you fuck someone like they are a millionaire they might go try to be one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
doug - evergreen park wrote:
You cannot assume that all people should know that you do not swim or wade in fresh water in Florida.
That is why you have no swimming signs, which they did.

The signs didn't say "Don't go more than 5 feet into the water".

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32067
pizza_Place: Milano's
if only there was a good guy with a gun around to shoot it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
doug - evergreen park wrote:
You cannot assume that all people should know that you do not swim or wade in fresh water in Florida.
That is why you have no swimming signs, which they did.

The signs didn't say "Don't go more than 5 feet into the water".


Do you ever speed?

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Do you ever speed?
Yes.

I understand that it creates a more dangerous situation though.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 3:05 am
Posts: 28664
pizza_Place: Clamburger's
Brick, c'mon we know you love debate, but seriously? I like you as a poster, but your stance is bordering on morbid.

_________________
Nardi wrote:
Weird, I see Dolphin looking in my asshole


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Jbi11s wrote:
Brick, c'mon we know you love debate, but seriously? I like you as a poster, but your stance is bordering on morbid.
There is nothing morbid about it.

We don't have to act like it was the right decision to ignore the fact that there was something dangerous about going in that water just because it didn't specifically say "GATORS" and it instead said "No swimming".

I'm not saying the parents are horrible people or anything. They made a mistake. To assume that any water that says "No Swimming" is safe to enter doesn't make sense.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Some keep asking how much Disney is required to warn people of... and then bringing up extreme examples like mosquitoes.

However, the reality is there are answers to that question. Our tort laws have reviewed cases like this for hundreds of years, and we as a society have determined that there is a very large burden for places like Disney World to SPECIFICALLY notify any guests of known dangers that are controllable. Clearly, Disney knew about the gators, did nothing to remove them, and only had "no swimming" signs to deter guests from going in the water.

Anyway, my point is that, as with many issues, this does not have to be an all-or-nothing proposition where they have to warn you of every danger or none. It is based on years of experience in deliberating such matters and determining what the reasonable duties owed to others are in different situations.

I'm not going to pretend to be familiar with Florida case law or even the minutia of this circumstance, but based on what we know, I have a hard time believing that Disney wouldn't be found to be nearly 100% negligent for not separating their invited guests from such a clear danger and for creating attractive nuisances like beaches on those same waters.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Jbi11s wrote:
Brick, c'mon we know you love debate, but seriously? I like you as a poster, but your stance is bordering on morbid.
There is nothing morbid about it.

We don't have to act like it was the right decision to ignore the fact that there was something dangerous about going in that water just because it didn't specifically say "GATORS" and it instead said "No swimming".

I'm not saying the parents are horrible people or anything. They made a mistake. To assume that any water that says "No Swimming" is safe to enter doesn't make sense.


Yes, it does. It doesn't make sense to you. To someone else, it could mean any number of things. And you're kind of acting like the result was of some minor consequence like a fine. A kid got dragged into the water by an alligator. That warrants more than "No Swimming." And apparently, Disney now agrees since they're updating all their signs.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
Yes, it does. It doesn't make sense to you. To someone else, it could mean any number of things. And you're kind of acting like the result was of some minor consequence like a fine. A kid got dragged into the water by an alligator. That warrants more than "No Swimming." And apparently, Disney now agrees since they're updating all their signs.
There is nothing that a "no swimming" sign can mean that isn't that there is at least some danger in entering the water.

I just want you to admit that when there is a "no swimming" sign that there is at least some notice posted of potential danger and it is not a good idea to enter the water. People are acting like the parents had no reason to believe there was any danger in this water. That just isn't true. At least when I saw at Disney, they made it clear that the only water you are supposed to go in to is the swimming pools even with resorts that have natural water around it.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Yes, it does. It doesn't make sense to you. To someone else, it could mean any number of things. And you're kind of acting like the result was of some minor consequence like a fine. A kid got dragged into the water by an alligator. That warrants more than "No Swimming." And apparently, Disney now agrees since they're updating all their signs.
There is nothing that a "no swimming" sign can mean that isn't that there is at least some danger in entering the water.

I just want you to admit that when there is a "no swimming" sign that there is at least some notice posted of potential danger and it is not a good idea to enter the water. People are acting like the parents had no reason to believe there was any danger in this water. That just isn't true. At least when I saw at Disney, they made it clear that the only water you are supposed to go in to is the swimming pools even with resorts that have natural water around it.


But I don't agree with that. "No Swimming" could mean, off the top of my head...

- We don't want you bringing certain types of bacteria to these waters
- There is an additional fee to swim in these waters
- People swimming in these waters affects the "scene" of the waters


Additionally, he didn't swim. He stood.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
leashyourkids wrote:
- We don't want you bringing certain types of bacteria to these waters
- There is an additional fee to swim in these waters
- People swimming in these waters affects the "scene" of the waters
All three of those things would be just as true about standing in the water.

So, if they really thought that it was about any of those things then they shouldn't have let him in there.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 2865
pizza_Place: maciano's
The no swimming signs were never intended for gators, they stemmed from rental boats.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Seas_Lagoon wrote:
But it was originally built for both swimming and surfing. "Swimming was originally allowed, but has since been prohibited for safety reasons due to the operation of the rental boats." *** "The Seven Seas Lagoon was originally configured for artificial waves, tall enough to allow surfing. The machine began operation with the opening of the resort in 1971. However, it was soon disabled after causing severe beach erosion...."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
But it didn't say "DANGER: Boats"!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:12 pm
Posts: 2865
pizza_Place: maciano's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
But it didn't say "DANGER: Boats"!


Correct, it simply advocated against exercising in these waters. No sign of danger what so ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:36 pm
Posts: 16815
pizza_Place: Il Forno in Deerfield!
One thing that came out of this thread is that I've lost a lot of respect for Brick's level of intelligence. He really comes off like an idiot here.



you guys enjoy, I spend enough time dealing with idiots as it is and usually I get paid at the end.

_________________
LTG wrote:
Trae Young will be a bust. Book It!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:28 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Is this discussion really still going on? How far will Rick go to defend these billionaires? I get the feeling that if Roy Disney Jr. beat the fuck out of Frank and his wife on Mr. Toad's Wild Ride, Rick would say that it is Disney's Land and if Frank doesn't like he should go to Universal next time instead.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
I disagree with shakes. My perception of Rick's intelligence remains unchanged.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Is this discussion really still going on? How far will Rick go to defend these billionaires? I get the feeling that if Roy Disney Jr. beat the fuck out of Frank and his wife on Mr. Toad's Wild Ride, Rick would say that it is Disney's Land and if Frank doesn't like he should go to Universal next time instead.
I already said that Disney would most certainly lose a court case here though they will likely settle quickly.

I'm just saying that you shouldn't go in water that says "no swimming" even if you only go up to your belly button.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Is this discussion really still going on? How far will Rick go to defend these billionaires? I get the feeling that if Roy Disney Jr. beat the fuck out of Frank and his wife on Mr. Toad's Wild Ride, Rick would say that it is Disney's Land and if Frank doesn't like he should go to Universal next time instead.
I already said that Disney would most certainly lose a court case here though they will likely settle quickly.

I'm just saying that you shouldn't go in water that says "no swimming" even if you only go up to your belly button.


I'm not reading through eight pages of this, and I loathe Disney, but Rick's right here. The parents have more of a responsibility/are in the wrong than most want to admit. No swimming means stay the F out of the water, period. Personally, I would have seen the signs and assumed that at the very minimum, the water wasn't clean, certainly not clean enough for a toddler.

And fwiw, please no one get hung up on Disney's new signs after the fact. That cannot be admitted in the upcoming court case.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:37 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79558
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Regular Reader wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Is this discussion really still going on? How far will Rick go to defend these billionaires? I get the feeling that if Roy Disney Jr. beat the fuck out of Frank and his wife on Mr. Toad's Wild Ride, Rick would say that it is Disney's Land and if Frank doesn't like he should go to Universal next time instead.
I already said that Disney would most certainly lose a court case here though they will likely settle quickly.

I'm just saying that you shouldn't go in water that says "no swimming" even if you only go up to your belly button.


I'm not reading through eight pages of this, and I loathe Disney, but Rick's right here. The parents have more of a responsibility/are in the wrong than most want to admit. No swimming means stay the F out of the water, period. Personally, I would have seen the signs and assumed that at the very minimum, the water wasn't clean, certainly not clean enough for a toddler.

And fwiw, please no one get hung up on Disney's new signs after the fact. That cannot be admitted in the upcoming court case.


It has a beach, RR. I wouldn't think no swimming meant anything but no swimming.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23838
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Regular Reader wrote:
The parents have more of a responsibility/are in the wrong than most want to admit.


Or that piling on the parents who watched their son get killed by an alligator isn't worth it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Regular Reader wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Is this discussion really still going on? How far will Rick go to defend these billionaires? I get the feeling that if Roy Disney Jr. beat the fuck out of Frank and his wife on Mr. Toad's Wild Ride, Rick would say that it is Disney's Land and if Frank doesn't like he should go to Universal next time instead.
I already said that Disney would most certainly lose a court case here though they will likely settle quickly.

I'm just saying that you shouldn't go in water that says "no swimming" even if you only go up to your belly button.


I'm not reading through eight pages of this, and I loathe Disney, but Rick's right here. The parents have more of a responsibility/are in the wrong than most want to admit. No swimming means stay the F out of the water, period. Personally, I would have seen the signs and assumed that at the very minimum, the water wasn't clean, certainly not clean enough for a toddler.

And fwiw, please no one get hung up on Disney's new signs after the fact. That cannot be admitted in the upcoming court case.


I'll get hung up on whatever I'd like. What do ya' think about that?!

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It has a beach, RR. I wouldn't think no swimming meant anything but no swimming.
Look like I'm not "Mr. Literal" in this thread. :lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
It has a beach, RR. I wouldn't think no swimming meant anything but no swimming.


Would you have gotten in the water that has a no swimming sign at dusk? Especially if there was a relatively clean pool steps away. Hell when we were kids all the park lagoon signs said "No Swimming". But every year some dumbassed kid would drown, or get some kind of infection from walking/trying to swim in that crap. Like the old saying goes, "you don't believe fat meat's greasy?!?" It/they are there for a reason, and in this case, "because" is enough.

Plus I have a childhood's fill of memories of cops/teachers/parents/etc., saying to me & friends: "What's the matter with you, can't you read? Get your simple ass the hell out of there. The signs are there for a reason/etc.."

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
leashyourkids wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
And fwiw, please no one get hung up on Disney's new signs after the fact. That cannot be admitted in the upcoming court case.


I'll get hung up on whatever I'd like. What do ya' think about that?!


However you get your jollies is fine by me. :lol:

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 10:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 38609
Location: "Across 110th Street"
KDdidit wrote:
Regular Reader wrote:
The parents have more of a responsibility/are in the wrong than most want to admit.


Or that piling on the parents who watched their son get killed by an alligator isn't worth it.


Piling on, no. But they're just as culpable as the Cincinnati zoo parents.

_________________
There are only two examples of infinity: The universe and human stupidity and I'm not sure about the universe.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
leashyourkids wrote:
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Sign doesn't READ JUST FINE?


:lol:

Where's Someguy to bitch?


Ayyyyyyye, you gotta problem with SomeGuy?

YES or NO?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57239
https://twitter.com/TharinWhite/status/ ... 6319115265

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Disney
PostPosted: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92050
Location: To the left of my post
RFDC wrote:
https://twitter.com/TharinWhite/status/743881496319115265
Not impressed. I'm letting my kid jump the fence to wade in there.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 255 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group