and a big united states flag hat and a designer fanny pack

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.

Well, I couldn't ignore it, because his implication is that the Mossad did it and it's being staged to look like a black Muslim did it instead, and I don't find that likely.

_________________

I saw a recent Princeton grad was among the dead. Is the left cheering the fact that this hero eliminated someone who most likely wouldve ended working for some evil corporation that keeps the people down yet ?

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.

What?

_________________

He wasn't going to work for an evil corporation because no one really wants to hire Ivy grads over state school grads.

_________________

He was partying on NYE instead of studying Mandarin or conducting science experiments in his basement.

Vivek was right.

_________________

What a fun stupid game. Is the right cheering the fact that this hero eliminated someone who most likely was hanging out at the pro-Palestine encampment on Princeton's campus?

Who did what now?

_________________

Problem is, we need to just accept a guy who runs over people with cars for his religion imperfections .

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.

Can we kill another insurance CEO?

_________________

He should have been more like Urkel, asking "did I do that?" Now, he won't be doing anything.

I'm John Feinstein. Or Vivek Ramaswamy.

_________________

Maybe Allstate had the insurance on the NO truck and the CEO's trying to save some money on the settlements. Somehow.

Why aren't we just ignoring this like we do school shootings?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!

You’re in good hands, unless you got run over or were the Georgia Bulldogs last night.

I'm not sure that's what he's doing.

I don't find it crazy to think the FBI whipped him into a frenzy like they did with the Whitmer kidnappers, the Cactus Club bomber, and J6 and he moved before they could reel him in. That would be pretty embarrassing.

I also find it interesting that CIA cutout Natasha Bertrand is suddenly weighing in.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

Your error is in framing constant media propaganda as a "Left-Right" issue.

They have no issue lying about anyone to achieve their narrative.

For example, there was no media coverage of the Biden DOJ arresting black socialists under the auspice of fighting Russian election interference.

We are. N9body is talking about banning cars.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014

I was framing it as dumb post so I’m glad you thought it was dumb.

That falls under climate change emergency.

_________________
Elections have consequences.

Tesla/Trump hotel thing is weird too.

“Imagine trying to intimidate Trump and @elonmusk with a carbomb but you end up just killing yourself and running a @cybertruck ad campaign,” Chloe Cole posted along with a video of the burned-out Tesla vehicle.
To which Musk replied of the vehicle’s charred remains: “I’m pretty sure we could get it running again too.”

_________________

The guy committed suicide by shooting himself in the head before the explosion.

Yes, Tesla has a lot of experience with vehicles that burst into flames.

I see Jorr has a terminal case of brainworms. Kind of sad because he was a smart person before dementia set in.

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson

It took him 2 days day and like 20 stops to drive that POS like 18 blocks. Terrible ad.

That's exactly what he's doing. It's why he griped about how the reporter "called a work bench a 'bomb making station'" (the FBI said they found residues of chemicals on the bench that are commonly used in making of explosives), and how they "conveniently find a kuffiyeh in his closet".

The entire point of his tweet was to imply that the reporting was fake and any evidence of violent muslim extremism was planted by the FBI with the complicity of a provocatively clad whore of the Ultra-Zionist (new species coming to Warhammer 40K) New York Post.

Forget about Blumenthal's irrational hatred of Israel. Is it standard procedure to grant a reporter unfettered access to a perpetrator's apartment immediately after a crime?

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

I see you've switched to saying she was allowed unfettered access from your earlier posts saying she was let inside alone, and also switched to "a perpetrator's apartment" instead of your earlier use of "an active crime scene". I interpret that to mean that you actually watched the video a little closer and realized that the receipt for seized property likely means the "active crime scene" (a single-wide trailer) had been catalogued and no longer was considered as such, yet you want to cling to "immediately" to keep some sinister air about this. Nevermind that you can't actually articulate what it is.

As for whether this is standard, I don't know, maybe in some cases it is and others it isn't. The FBI alerted reporters to the Stone raid, didn't they? Maybe it wasn't the FBI who let them in at all, maybe it was the landlord presuming the property wasn't owned by the terrorist himself? Maybe they filmed themselves committing a crime and broke into a property now held by the terrorist's estate.

I'm not interested in a semantic argument. If you don't want to call it a "crime scene" I'm fine with that. The crime being investigated didn't occur there but it seems as if crimes had been planned there at a minimum and the scene is obviously pertinent to an investigation of a crime that did occur.

And we've both seen the video. Was she accompanied by the FBI or anyone responsible for the investigation? Not that we can see. Although it's likely someone was there. Were they watching her closely or not? I don't know.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.

No I understand why you wouldn't want someone traipsing through a crime scene actively under investigation and while the authorities catalogue evidence. You'll notice however, that the receipt for property left on the kitchen seems to indicate that the investigation and cataloguing phase of processing that particular "crime scene", had been concluded. Is it safe to say that once a receipt for property seized has been issued that the investigating agency no longer considers the site a crime scene in that they must regulate access to the scene lest evidence be compromised?

And you're obviously still fixated on the notion that it was the FBI (and not the landlord, say) which let this reporter into the house. So OK, let's presume they did. So what? They were worried about her contaminating evidence they had already catalogued, seized, and left a receipt for?

Let's work big to small: Should nobody ever go in the house or on the property again because it is a "crime scene"?