I can come up with many other examples but that's the easiest one.

What about a breaking story about the Bears interviewing/hiring Getsy? That's far more secretive than the publicly available flight data.

Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.

The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.

I suppose the policy would cause a suspension if somebody said the McCaskey’s private jet will be arriving at Palwaukee at 12:34pm with Getsy onboard.

Correct. Variations of that tweet would also get you suspended. "Getsy is on his way to Halas Hall for an afternoon interview" would also qualify.

Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.

The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.

Banning someone for their political beliefs. Bad.

Banning someone for their political beliefs. Good.

Glad that’s sorted out.

We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.

I thought I heard that someone harassed his kid. I'd be pissed off too.

Why is he that paranoid? You would think he would have offered more than $5k to the kid if he were genuinely concerned about his safety. It sounds like some reporters baited him into banning them. I've seen that happen somewhere before.

If I owned Twitter the only person who would be banned is Baby McNown.

If I owned Twitter the only person who would be banned is Baby McNown.

Hate to tell ya this "Amigo", but that is sort of the essence of how life works.

Assassination coordinates is either extremely melodramatic or an excellent troll

I'd suspect if a major component to your assassination plot involved some random asshole's Twitter account, the plot isn't going to be successful.

If anyone has participated in an assassination I would appreciate a ruling.

The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.

But were the libs owned?

The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.

Is water wet or is wetness water? Something to consider

Is water wet or is wetness water? Something to consider

Water is not considered to be wet, as wetness is a property that is typically associated with a surface that is in contact with a liquid, and water itself is a liquid. When a surface becomes wet, it absorbs a liquid, such as water, and the liquid covers the surface. The surface itself is not wet, but rather it has a wet substance on it. In this sense, water can make a surface wet, but water itself is not wet.

The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.

Better question is if national republicans are laughably idiot hypocrites or do their laughable sheeple just not care?

The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.

Rule rescinded. Now accepting apologies from those who defended it.

The EU's threats to the African American may be responsible for the reversal.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/musks-suspen ... 14562.html