It is currently Mon Mar 31, 2025 12:16 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 57200
Location: Kilfish, Ill.
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
I'm not doing "ignore the part where he thinks a Jewish cabal controls the world and focus on the rest of it." That's unbaking a cake.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:45 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81105
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And you're obviously still fixated on the notion that it was the FBI (and not the landlord, say) which let this reporter into the house.


I don't know how she got into the house. So what? Shouldn't the FBI have secured the apartment?

Is the FBI using her to paint a particular narrative for some purpose? You don't know and I don't know. But let's not pretend that her accessing that apartment the way she did and as quickly as she did is typical.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 6:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23807
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And you're obviously still fixated on the notion that it was the FBI (and not the landlord, say) which let this reporter into the house.


I don't know how she got into the house. So what? Shouldn't the FBI have secured the apartment?

Is the FBI using her to paint a particular narrative for some purpose? You don't know and I don't know. But let's not pretend that her accessing that apartment the way she did and as quickly as she did is typical.

Should the FBI control access to the trailer forever, effectively seizing it, just in case some other evidence is found? Can control of access to the property ever, under any circumstance, be returned to the person who owns it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 7:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19725
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1875285608374911242

BREAKING: Shawn Ryan says he is going into hiding following the release of his most recent episode where he shares an email allegedly sent by Matthew Livelsberger before the Trump hotel explosion.

Guest Sam Shoemate says he was sent an email on Tuesday from Livelsberger before the explosion, saying the drones over NJ were operating by the use of a "gravitic propulsion system."

Only the US and China have this capability, according to the email.

"On December 31st, Sam received an email allegedly from Matthew Livelsberger - who would be named as the perpetrator in the detonation of a Tesla Cybertruck at Trump Tower the following day," Ryan said on YouTube.

Here is what the email said, according to @samosaur
:

"In case I do not make it to my decision point or on to the Mexico border I am sending this now. Please do not release this until 1JAN and keep my identity private until then.

First off I am not under duress or hostile influence or control. My first car was a 2006 Black Ford Mustang V6 for verification.

What we have been seeing with "drones" is the operational use of gravitic propulsion systems powered aircraft by most recently China in the east coast, but throughout history, the US. Only we and China have this capability. Our OPEN location for this activity in the box is below.

China has been launching them from the Atlantic from submarines for years, but this activity recently has picked up. As of now, it is just a show of force and they are using it similar to how they used the balloon for sigint and isr, which are also part of the integrated coms system. There are dozens of those balloons in the air at any given time.

The so what is because of the speed and stealth of these unmanned AC, they are the most dangerous threat to national security that has ever existed. They basically have an unlimited payload capacity and can park it over the WH if they wanted. It's checkmate.

USG needs to give the history of this, how we are employing it and weaponizing it, how China is employing them and what the way forward is. China is poised to attack anywhere in the east coast

I've been followed for over a week now from likely homeland or FBI, and they are looking to move on me and are unlikely going to let me cross into Mexico, but won't because they know I am armed and I have a massive VBIED. I've been trying to maintain a very visible profile and have kept my phone and they are definitely digitally tracking me.

I have knowledge of this program and also war crimes that were covered up during airstrikes in Nimruz province Afghanistan in 2019 by the admin, DoD, DEA and CIA. I conducted targeting for these strikes of over 125 buildings (65 were struck because of CIVCAS) that killed hundreds of civilians in a single day. USFORA continued strikes after spotting civilians on initial ISR, it was supposed to take 6 minutes and scramble all aircraft in CENTCOM. The UN basically called these war crimes, but the administration made them disappear. I was part of that cover-up with USFORA and Agent [Redacted] of the DEA. So I don't know if my abduction attempt is related to either. I worked with GEN Millers 10 staff on this as well as the response to Bala Murghab. AOB-S Commander at the time. [Redacted] can validate this.

You need to elevate this to the media so we avoid a world war because this is a mutually assured destruction situation.

For vetting my Linkedin is Matt Berg or Matthew Livelsberger, an active duty 18Z out of 1-10 my profile is public. I have an active TSSCI with UAP USAP access."

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 8:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 41152
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
For whatever it’s worth and 18Z is a green beret

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 10:36 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81105
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And you're obviously still fixated on the notion that it was the FBI (and not the landlord, say) which let this reporter into the house.


I don't know how she got into the house. So what? Shouldn't the FBI have secured the apartment?

Is the FBI using her to paint a particular narrative for some purpose? You don't know and I don't know. But let's not pretend that her accessing that apartment the way she did and as quickly as she did is typical.

Should the FBI control access to the trailer forever, effectively seizing it, just in case some other evidence is found? Can control of access to the property ever, under any circumstance, be returned to the person who owns it?


Forever? :lol:

Come on, man. Has the case been wrapped up?

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 10:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 66189
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Didn't they tow away kazcynski's cabin in toto and like... put it in the Smithsonian or some damn shit?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 11:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19509
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And you're obviously still fixated on the notion that it was the FBI (and not the landlord, say) which let this reporter into the house.


Is the FBI using her to paint a particular narrative for some purpose? You don't know and I don't know.

You clearly think they are :lol:

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 11:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 44045
Darkside wrote:
Didn't they tow away kazcynski's cabin in toto and like... put it in the Smithsonian or some damn shit?

Hi whistler

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 03, 2025 11:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23807
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And you're obviously still fixated on the notion that it was the FBI (and not the landlord, say) which let this reporter into the house.


I don't know how she got into the house. So what? Shouldn't the FBI have secured the apartment?

Is the FBI using her to paint a particular narrative for some purpose? You don't know and I don't know. But let's not pretend that her accessing that apartment the way she did and as quickly as she did is typical.

Should the FBI control access to the trailer forever, effectively seizing it, just in case some other evidence is found? Can control of access to the property ever, under any circumstance, be returned to the person who owns it?


Forever? :lol:

Come on, man. Has the case been wrapped up?

So the entire "case", based on the actions of a dead terrorist, needs to be "wrapped up" before government investigators relinquish control of the single-wide trailer they searched and seized property from in a day? For what purpose?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 7:21 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81105
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
SpiralStairs wrote:
Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And you're obviously still fixated on the notion that it was the FBI (and not the landlord, say) which let this reporter into the house.


Is the FBI using her to paint a particular narrative for some purpose? You don't know and I don't know.

You clearly think they are :lol:



Only because they do it all the time. It's SOP.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 7:22 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81105
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And you're obviously still fixated on the notion that it was the FBI (and not the landlord, say) which let this reporter into the house.


I don't know how she got into the house. So what? Shouldn't the FBI have secured the apartment?

Is the FBI using her to paint a particular narrative for some purpose? You don't know and I don't know. But let's not pretend that her accessing that apartment the way she did and as quickly as she did is typical.

Should the FBI control access to the trailer forever, effectively seizing it, just in case some other evidence is found? Can control of access to the property ever, under any circumstance, be returned to the person who owns it?


Forever? :lol:

Come on, man. Has the case been wrapped up?

So the entire "case", based on the actions of a dead terrorist, needs to be "wrapped up" before government investigators relinquish control of the single-wide trailer they searched and seized property from in a day? For what purpose?


I'm not sure if you're serious. It had been one day.

For what purpose? Did he have co-conspirators or did he act alone? Maybe the New York Post can find out. In fact, I'd trust them to do so more than the FBI. Maybe we should just get rid of the FBI.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19509
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And you're obviously still fixated on the notion that it was the FBI (and not the landlord, say) which let this reporter into the house.


Is the FBI using her to paint a particular narrative for some purpose? You don't know and I don't know.

You clearly think they are :lol:



Only because they do it all the time. It's SOP.

Then why bother including the extraneous bit about how “you don’t know” the FBI did this?

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 8:43 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 81105
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
SpiralStairs wrote:
Rod wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And you're obviously still fixated on the notion that it was the FBI (and not the landlord, say) which let this reporter into the house.


Is the FBI using her to paint a particular narrative for some purpose? You don't know and I don't know.

You clearly think they are :lol:



Only because they do it all the time. It's SOP.

Then why bother including the extraneous bit about how “you don’t know” the FBI did this?



Uh, because I don't.

_________________
The Court will accord substantial deference to the government's immigration policies, particularly those that implicate matters of national security.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 9:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19509
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
You believe they do, which is more powerful than actually knowing.

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7136
pittmike wrote:
Would America be safer if it had significantly more electric trucks?


Going to say, No!
Quote:
Tesla Cybertruck explosion outside Trump hotel investigated as potential terror attack


Image

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19725
So what is the FBIs motivation for running all those people over?

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 12:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:33 pm
Posts: 19509
pizza_Place: World Famous Pizza
Taking JORRs bike lanes away

_________________
Seacrest wrote:
The menstrual cycle changes among Hassidic Jewish women was something as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 33526
pizza_Place: What??
conns7901 wrote:
So what is the FBIs motivation for running all those people over?

Irrespective of this situation, I take nothing the FBI does at face value. After 100 years of secret policing, do you?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 1:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:46 pm
Posts: 23807
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Rod wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
And you're obviously still fixated on the notion that it was the FBI (and not the landlord, say) which let this reporter into the house.


I don't know how she got into the house. So what? Shouldn't the FBI have secured the apartment?

Is the FBI using her to paint a particular narrative for some purpose? You don't know and I don't know. But let's not pretend that her accessing that apartment the way she did and as quickly as she did is typical.

Should the FBI control access to the trailer forever, effectively seizing it, just in case some other evidence is found? Can control of access to the property ever, under any circumstance, be returned to the person who owns it?


Forever? :lol:

Come on, man. Has the case been wrapped up?

So the entire "case", based on the actions of a dead terrorist, needs to be "wrapped up" before government investigators relinquish control of the single-wide trailer they searched and seized property from in a day? For what purpose?


I'm not sure if you're serious. It had been one day.

For what purpose? Did he have co-conspirators or did he act alone? Maybe the New York Post can find out. In fact, I'd trust them to do so more than the FBI. Maybe we should just get rid of the FBI.

It seems you're trying to obliquely argue that the FBI improperly processed and closed the crime scene after arguing that the FBI let in the NYP reporter despite no evidence as well as obviously missing that it was not an "active crime scene" given the receipt for property and copy of the warrant left. And your only ultimate gripe is that the FBI should have maintained control of the crime scene, a single wide trailer scoured by possibly a dozen or more agents, for longer, for reasons you still haven't articulated.

You've gone from quoting a nut who implied that the investigation was a Jewish conspiracy, to implying that the FBI allowed the reporter in on their own "unfettered" to an "active crime scene", and then when you finally realized the receipt and warrant copy are probably what law enforcement leaves behind when they're done processing a crime scene, that they didn't investigate it for long enough. Afraid they missed a guy hiding in the walls?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 25032
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
https://nevadacurrent.com/briefs/cybert ... on-iphone/

Vegas guy sent a mass Wake Up Sheeple! email trying to incite a Jan 6th riot. Not to install Kamala or anything, just to get rid of all the Democrats.
Quote:
Fellow Servicemembers, Veterans, and all Americans,

TIME TO WAKE UP!

We are being led by weak and feckless leadership who only serve to enrich themselves.
Military and vets move on DC starting now. Militias facilitate and augment this activity.

Occupy every major road along fed buildings and the campus of fed buildings by the hundreds of
thousands.

Lock the highways around down with semis right after everybody gets in. Hold until the purge is
complete.

Try peaceful means first, but be prepared to fight to get the Dems out of the fed government and
military by any means necessary. They all must go and a hard reset must occur for our country to
avoid collapse.

-MSG Matt Livelsberger 18Z, 10th Special Forces Group



PTSD sucks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 04, 2025 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 38151
Location: ...
dem derangement syndrome.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group