Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

The State of Oklahoma
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=100812
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Don Tiny [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:30 pm ]
Post subject:  The State of Oklahoma

I .... I don't even have the words for this one.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2016/06/08/new-frontiers-in-asset-forfeiture/

New frontiers in asset forfeiture

While much of the progress on criminal justice reform has stalled in recent months, there has been quite a bit of progress on civil asset forfeiture. Several states have continued to put curbs on abuses. New Mexico, Montana and New Hampshire recently passed laws requiring a conviction before property can be forfeited. (Although at least in New Mexico, police agencies appear to be straight-up ignoring the law.)

But law enforcement agencies aren’t giving up the lucrative (for them) practice without a fight. The most common form of property seized is cash. In fact, carrying large amounts of cash is now in and of itself viewed as suspicion of criminal activity. People who still do carry a lot of cash today have as much to fear from law enforcement as they do from criminals, particularly if they’re planning to fly or drive on a highway that passes through a “forfeiture corridor.”

The police theory has been that because most criminals work with cash (probably true), most people carrying a lot of cash are probably criminals (probably not true). Don’t want to be under suspicion? Don’t carry cash.

But the Oklahoma state police are now using some new technology that could make that advice obsolete.

The Oklahoma Highway Patrol has a device that also allows them to seize money in your bank account or on prepaid cards.

It’s called an ERAD, or Electronic Recovery and Access to Data machine, and state police began using 16 of them last month.

Here’s how it works. If a trooper suspects you may have money tied to some type of crime, the highway patrol can scan any cards you have and seize the money.

“We’re gonna look for different factors in the way that you’re acting,” Oklahoma Highway Patrol Lt. John Vincent said. “We’re gonna look for if there’s a difference in your story. If there’s someway that we can prove that you’re falsifying information to us about your business.”

Troopers insist this isn’t just about seizing cash.

“I know that a lot of people are just going to focus on the seizing money. That’s a very small thing that’ s happening now. The largest part that we have found … the biggest benefit has been the identity theft,” Vincent said.

“If you can prove can prove that you have a legitimate reason to have that money it will be given back to you. And we’ve done that in the past,” Vincent said about any money seized.


Since we’re talking about prepaid cards, I’m not sure how this is going to help fight identity theft. Unlike a regular credit card, a prepaid card can be used only if someone adds money to it. Maybe I’m overlooking something, but I just don’t see any advantage to using someone’s identity to obtain a prepaid card unless the thief also has access to the victim’s banking account. But if a thief has access to your bank account, I’m not sure why he’d go to the trouble of then obtaining a prepaid card and filling it with your money.

There is some evidence that some criminals are moving to prepaid cards as alternative to cash. But a lot of low-income people and people with bad credit use prepaid cards, too. Not coincidentally, they’re also more likely to be pulled over and more likely to be suspected of using or selling illicit drugs. Wealthier people with conventional credit cards don’t have to worry about this new technology.

The even scarier question here is whether this technology can also seize money in accounts that are tied to check cards or secured credit cards.

One more thing:

News 9 obtained a copy of the contract with the state.

It shows the state is paying ERAD Group Inc., $5,000 for the software and scanners, then 7.7 percent of all the cash the highway patrol seizes.


Sorry, but that sort of arrangement is shady. As we’ve seen with traffic cameras, private probation and other areas of criminal justice, giving a private company a cut of seized assets is an arrangement rife with bad incentives and ripe for corruption.

Let’s not forget that this is the same state where a district attorney was caught contracting forfeiture actions out to private company, including the authority to pull over motorists. Another prosecutor used forfeiture funds to pay off his student loans. Still another used the law to live rent-free in a seized house, despite a judge’s order to sell it. He also used forfeiture proceeds to pay his utility bills.

A report published last year found that of the $6 million seized by Oklahoma law enforcement agencies over the previous five years, two-thirds was taken from people who were never charged with a crime. The state received a “D” grade for its forfeiture polices by the libertarian advocacy law firm the Institute for Justice. And Oklahoma’s law enforcement community has been especially hostile to any efforts at reform. Last year, Tulsa District Attorney Steve Kunzweiler warned that if Oklahoma passed a law like the one in New Mexico, the state could expect to see decapitations by drug cartels and corpses swinging from bridges.

Author:  Nas [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

This is fucking ridiculous.

Author:  redskingreg [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

“If you can prove can prove that you have a legitimate reason to have that money it will be given back to you. And we’ve done that in the past,” Vincent said about any money seized.

Lucky for me, I keep a laminated W-2 on my person at all times.

Author:  Don Tiny [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

Nas wrote:
This is fucking ridiculous.


I mean, that's the kind of thing where it's somewhat reasonable to expect people to finally rise up and start the beheadings whilst singing a jaunty rendition of La Marseillaise.

Author:  Chus [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

redskingreg wrote:
“If you can prove can prove that you have a legitimate reason to have that money it will be given back to you. And we’ve done that in the past,” Vincent said about any money seized.

Lucky for me, I keep a laminated W-2 on my person at all times.


Guilty until presumed innocent.

Author:  Sir Loin Of Beef [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

Don Tiny wrote:
I .... I don't even have the words for this one.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2016/06/08/new-frontiers-in-asset-forfeiture/

New frontiers in asset forfeiture

While much of the progress on criminal justice reform has stalled in recent months, there has been quite a bit of progress on civil asset forfeiture. Several states have continued to put curbs on abuses. New Mexico, Montana and New Hampshire recently passed laws requiring a conviction before property can be forfeited. (Although at least in New Mexico, police agencies appear to be straight-up ignoring the law.)

But law enforcement agencies aren’t giving up the lucrative (for them) practice without a fight. The most common form of property seized is cash. In fact, carrying large amounts of cash is now in and of itself viewed as suspicion of criminal activity. People who still do carry a lot of cash today have as much to fear from law enforcement as they do from criminals, particularly if they’re planning to fly or drive on a highway that passes through a “forfeiture corridor.”

The police theory has been that because most criminals work with cash (probably true), most people carrying a lot of cash are probably criminals (probably not true). Don’t want to be under suspicion? Don’t carry cash.

But the Oklahoma state police are now using some new technology that could make that advice obsolete.

The Oklahoma Highway Patrol has a device that also allows them to seize money in your bank account or on prepaid cards.

It’s called an ERAD, or Electronic Recovery and Access to Data machine, and state police began using 16 of them last month.

Here’s how it works. If a trooper suspects you may have money tied to some type of crime, the highway patrol can scan any cards you have and seize the money.

“We’re gonna look for different factors in the way that you’re acting,” Oklahoma Highway Patrol Lt. John Vincent said. “We’re gonna look for if there’s a difference in your story. If there’s someway that we can prove that you’re falsifying information to us about your business.”

Troopers insist this isn’t just about seizing cash.

“I know that a lot of people are just going to focus on the seizing money. That’s a very small thing that’ s happening now. The largest part that we have found … the biggest benefit has been the identity theft,” Vincent said.

“If you can prove can prove that you have a legitimate reason to have that money it will be given back to you. And we’ve done that in the past,” Vincent said about any money seized.


Since we’re talking about prepaid cards, I’m not sure how this is going to help fight identity theft. Unlike a regular credit card, a prepaid card can be used only if someone adds money to it. Maybe I’m overlooking something, but I just don’t see any advantage to using someone’s identity to obtain a prepaid card unless the thief also has access to the victim’s banking account. But if a thief has access to your bank account, I’m not sure why he’d go to the trouble of then obtaining a prepaid card and filling it with your money.

There is some evidence that some criminals are moving to prepaid cards as alternative to cash. But a lot of low-income people and people with bad credit use prepaid cards, too. Not coincidentally, they’re also more likely to be pulled over and more likely to be suspected of using or selling illicit drugs. Wealthier people with conventional credit cards don’t have to worry about this new technology.

The even scarier question here is whether this technology can also seize money in accounts that are tied to check cards or secured credit cards.

One more thing:

News 9 obtained a copy of the contract with the state.

It shows the state is paying ERAD Group Inc., $5,000 for the software and scanners, then 7.7 percent of all the cash the highway patrol seizes.


Sorry, but that sort of arrangement is shady. As we’ve seen with traffic cameras, private probation and other areas of criminal justice, giving a private company a cut of seized assets is an arrangement rife with bad incentives and ripe for corruption.

Let’s not forget that this is the same state where a district attorney was caught contracting forfeiture actions out to private company, including the authority to pull over motorists. Another prosecutor used forfeiture funds to pay off his student loans. Still another used the law to live rent-free in a seized house, despite a judge’s order to sell it. He also used forfeiture proceeds to pay his utility bills.

A report published last year found that of the $6 million seized by Oklahoma law enforcement agencies over the previous five years, two-thirds was taken from people who were never charged with a crime. The state received a “D” grade for its forfeiture polices by the libertarian advocacy law firm the Institute for Justice. And Oklahoma’s law enforcement community has been especially hostile to any efforts at reform. Last year, Tulsa District Attorney Steve Kunzweiler warned that if Oklahoma passed a law like the one in New Mexico, the state could expect to see decapitations by drug cartels and corpses swinging from bridges.


Here's another state to avoid.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

How is this even legal?

Author:  Regular Reader [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

Don Tiny wrote:
Nas wrote:
This is fucking ridiculous.


I mean, that's the kind of thing where it's somewhat reasonable to expect people to finally rise up and start the beheadings whilst singing a jaunty rendition of La Marseillaise.


And to think that this is one of the die hard 2nd Amendment fan states that elects Tea Partier after Tea Partier and idiots like JC Watts & Tom Coburn. But now they've elected leaders that move quickly to seize personal assets, despite what the Fourth Amendment may say.

But I'm sure Sooners also believe it won't be "their" assets ever being snatched by the state, but rather & more correctly(?) "those" peoples'. :lol:

Author:  Don Tiny [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

Lest you missed this gem from that piece ...

"It shows the state is paying ERAD Group Inc., $5,000 for the software and scanners, then 7.7 percent of all the cash the highway patrol seizes."

What. The. Fuck.

Author:  Don Tiny [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

Regular Reader wrote:
Don Tiny wrote:
Nas wrote:
This is fucking ridiculous.


I mean, that's the kind of thing where it's somewhat reasonable to expect people to finally rise up and start the beheadings whilst singing a jaunty rendition of La Marseillaise.


And to think that this is one of the die hard 2nd Amendment fan states that elects Tea Partier after Tea Partier and idiots like JC Watts & Tom Coburn. But now they've elected leaders that move quickly to seize personal assets, despite what the Fourth Amendment may say.

But I'm sure Sooners also believe it won't be "their" assets ever being snatched by the state, but rather & more correctly(?) "those" peoples'. :lol:


Bingo. Which indirectly answers Frank's question as to 'how' it's legal. It's legal because nobody of legal consequence gives a good Goddamn.

That said, to further answer Frank's question, some random internet person opined thusly:

The rationale [employed to justify the legality of this fuckery] is that they sue the property (be it cash, freight, vehicles, real estate, etc.) itself, and if their court case is successful, the property is forfeited to the government. It is set up that way because property does not have right protected by the constitution, and since it is a civil case, not a criminal case, the case is decided by a "preponderance of evidence," not evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. That means that the case is decided by whoever has the most evidence, and the burden of proof is not placed on the government.

Of course, this completely ignores the fact that the person the property was seized from does have rights protected by the constitution. As far as why the court doesn't recognize that these laws violate the property owners' 4th amendment rights is beyond me.

Author:  Hank Scorpio [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

Fuck. Wait until IL gets ahold of this tech... You'll cut a loud fart and get your assets seized for violating EPA standards.

Author:  Regular Reader [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

Don Tiny wrote:
Lest you missed this gem from that piece ...

"It shows the state is paying ERAD Group Inc., $5,000 for the software and scanners, then 7.7 percent of all the cash the highway patrol seizes."

What. The. Fuck.


Aside from the ridiculous practice, when the first person goes to court to recover their seized assets, who wants to bet that 7.7% will be unrecoverable under OK law.

Author:  Rod [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

This is long, but it's a great read. It will make your blood boil:

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/08/12/taken

Author:  Regular Reader [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

Hank Scorpio wrote:
Fuck. Wait until IL gets ahold of this tech... You'll cut a loud fart and get your assets seized for violating EPA standards.


The state has already brought complaints and secured fines against the candy company that (used to be?) just west of the Loop. IIRC, the IL EPA called the scent of chocolate wafting over the area a noxious fume. :lol:

Fart loudly/smelly & the Rauner is a comin'

Author:  Douchebag [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

John Oliver did a great piece on this a couple years ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kEpZWGgJks

Author:  Hank Scorpio [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This is long, but it's a great read. It will make your blood boil:

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/08/12/taken


I couldnt even finish it. The government fucks the poor worse than a tijuana hooker at a donkey show.

Author:  Regular Reader [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

Hank Scorpio wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
This is long, but it's a great read. It will make your blood boil:

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/08/12/taken


I couldnt even finish it. The government fucks the poor worse than a tijuana hooker at a donkey show.


And if you continue to fully believe the story local Texas "authorities" put out after the Naperville woman was found hung in her cell after being held for two days after a questionable traffic stop (& fraudulent police report to cover it up), read it again.

Author:  leashyourkids [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 5:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The State of Oklahoma

Whiners.

If you don't carry cash, you have nothing to worry about.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/