She was way too old to film porn.

Let's put it this way, she appeals to certain people with specific interests.

If I just happened to be a neo-nazi, white supremacist, or Bernie Sanders supporter then it wouldn't really effect my company.

Sure it could. You could easily have issues with co-workers or customers who were a different race.

You are missing the lead here.

How did they find out about her after hours employment?

I noticed that Astellas was flying a rainbow flag at their headquarters on Willow Road and they had a large float in the parade yesterday. Many other corporations also had floats in the parade. I just find it all very disingenuous. It's really just advertising to a particular demographic and not sincere support for living the way a person wants to live.

In the case of Astellas, a friend of mine did good work there for over 20 years before she decided to do some porn in her spare time and was terminated. This had no effect on her work at the company. While it's not exactly the same as being gay, the principle is very similar. It's an employer making a moral judgment on a person's sexual habits. So save me the hypocrisy and your stupid fucking float.

I don't think the principle is the same at all.

If I was filming neo-nazi, white supremacist, or Bernie Sanders videos I'd deserve to be fired by my company too.

If I just happened to be a neo-nazi, white supremacist, or Bernie Sanders supporter then it wouldn't really effect my company.

Businesses don't care. They hop on whatever they can.

It's for us to know they're always full of shit.

Making a porn on the side is not even close to the same thing as being part of a hateful and sometimes violent group like the KKK, Rick.

Making a porn isn't "bad." It might be frowned upon be certain people, but its not bad.

Belonging to a hate group is bad.

What if you had a kid and the teacher was doing porn on the weekends? Would that be ok? I honestly can't say my thoughts either way on that but I certainly understand if the school decides that is not appropriate.

The concept here is that they are in the hate group but it is not affecting their job at all.

Making a porn isn't "bad." It might be frowned upon be certain people, but its not bad.

Belonging to a hate group is bad.


Anyway, now we know we Joe Orr was against the NSFW section here

People thought the same things about homosexuals too. There are certain societal mores and taboos against porn (although one of the most popular modern TV stars is famous for nothing but a porno).

I guess my position would be that finding out about a porno a teacher made and using that as a reason not to make the hire is different than discovering the movie after she has been doing good work and earned a Golden Apple award and then firing her because of it. You should fire yourself first for a lack of due diligence. And then we come around to Seacrest's question, how did the administration find out about the porno?

That is a wrong concept. If someone belongs to a group that hates a specific race or religion, and then has to work with or for people belonging to that same group, it will affect their job.

I
In the case of Astellas, a friend of mine did good work there for over 20 years before she decided to do some porn in her spare time and was terminated.

Let's put it this way, she appeals to certain people with specific interests.

Rick, how would acting in a porno adversely affect a teachers ability to teach your kid? I can tell you how being a Nazi would affect it.