GoldenJet wrote:
Ok...so what is in these emails that should fan the flames of this latest feigned outrage?
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Julian Assange https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=101570 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | FavreFan [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 9:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Julian Assange |
This guy has a lot of balls talking about having documents that will lead Hillary to prison. Maybe if he reveals them she can just go hide in a foreign embassy for years like a little bitch instead of facing the music. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 9:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
Don't shoot the messenger. Plenty of other Regressive Communists in the place will do that for you. |
|
| Author: | Peoria Matt [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 9:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
SomeGuy wrote: Don't shoot the messenger. The outrage over where these documents came from and not what is in them is something to see. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 9:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
And didn't Snowden run away after exposing lies and corruption? |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 9:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
Peoria Matt wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Don't shoot the messenger. The outrage over where these documents came from and not what is in them is something to see. That's been the pivot point for the media since they were released. Just another confirmation that they are just a propaganda arm. Most rational people knew that already, though. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
Peoria Matt wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Don't shoot the messenger. The outrage over where these documents came from and not what is in them is something to see. Quite the effort to deflect/distract. |
|
| Author: | Peoria Matt [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
SomeGuy wrote: Peoria Matt wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Don't shoot the messenger. The outrage over where these documents came from and not what is in them is something to see. That's been the pivot point for the media since they were released. Just another confirmation that they are just a propaganda arm. Most rational people knew that already, though. Well, it's apparent they have accepted their role and are running with it. And they don't think they are in the wrong on anything. JUST SHUTUP AND VOTE HILLARY !!!!!! And now if Trump loses, he has the "rigged elections" to fall back on. What a year for him to run. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
Peoria Matt wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Don't shoot the messenger. The outrage over where these documents came from and not what is in them is something to see. I think people are just focused on what is in them. |
|
| Author: | GoldenJet [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
Ok...so what is in these emails that should fan the flames of this latest feigned outrage? |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
GoldenJet wrote: Ok...so what is in these emails that should fan the flames of this latest feigned outrage?
|
|
| Author: | Rod [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
Nas wrote: Peoria Matt wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Don't shoot the messenger. The outrage over where these documents came from and not what is in them is something to see. I think people are just focused on what is in them. Not after the Clinton PR team fires up the narrative that Assange is a Russian operative. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Nas wrote: Peoria Matt wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Don't shoot the messenger. The outrage over where these documents came from and not what is in them is something to see. I think people are just focused on what is in them. Not after the Clinton PR team fires up the narrative that Assange is a Russian operative. I don't think it will stick. The people who would care are voting for Trump no matter what. Imagine if a Democrat praised Putin and had some business in Russia. |
|
| Author: | Peoria Matt [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
Nas wrote: Imagine if a Democrat praised Putin and had some business in Russia. Imagine if this was the RNC email leaks. It would be around the clock coverage. Every little detail would be dissected. The outrage would be amazing. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
Nas wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Nas wrote: Peoria Matt wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Don't shoot the messenger. The outrage over where these documents came from and not what is in them is something to see. I think people are just focused on what is in them. Not after the Clinton PR team fires up the narrative that Assange is a Russian operative. I don't think it will stick. The people who would care are voting for Trump no matter what. Imagine if a Democrat praised Putin and had some business in Russia. Clinton may not have praised Putin but she did the deal with Russia |
|
| Author: | Rod [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
SomeGuy wrote: Nas wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Nas wrote: Peoria Matt wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Don't shoot the messenger. The outrage over where these documents came from and not what is in them is something to see. I think people are just focused on what is in them. Not after the Clinton PR team fires up the narrative that Assange is a Russian operative. I don't think it will stick. The people who would care are voting for Trump no matter what. Imagine if a Democrat praised Putin and had some business in Russia. Clinton may not have praised Putin but she did the deal with Russia She sold them our fucking uranium fields. |
|
| Author: | GoldenJet [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Nas wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Nas wrote: Peoria Matt wrote: The outrage over where these documents came from and not what is in them is something to see. I think people are just focused on what is in them. Not after the Clinton PR team fires up the narrative that Assange is a Russian operative. I don't think it will stick. The people who would care are voting for Trump no matter what. Imagine if a Democrat praised Putin and had some business in Russia. Clinton may not have praised Putin but she did the deal with Russia She sold them our fucking uranium fields. Well that's certainly a leap |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
When would the best time be to release the emails to cause the most damage? I'm thinking 10 days before the election would do the most damage and hand Trump the presidency...I wouldn't release them just yet..its too early |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 11:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
It's not a shock but Assange is pretty much proving himself to be as bad as the people and things he is "exposing". Holding and releasing information in a specific manner to affect elections isn't exactly a moral goal. Just do it all and let the world know these things. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
Has he said when he plans on releasing these other emails? |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: She sold them our fucking uranium fields. As Secretary of State she approved the sale of a large quantity of uranium ore via UraniumOne. After it was OK'd the facilitator of the deal (a bank) made sure to donate a few cool millions to the Clinton Foundation. After the transfer and sale were finished that bank then went to give Bill Clinton a few hundred thousand smackers to come and give a 30 min pep talk. Totally normal. #CognitiveDissonanceForClinton. #ResetButton #CrookedHillary #LibyaForSidBlumenthal #TrumpTrain2016 |
|
| Author: | TurdFerguson [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
312player wrote: When would the best time be to release the emails to cause the most damage? I'm thinking 10 days before the election would do the most damage and hand Trump the presidency...I wouldn't release them just yet..its too early If it is truly a poison pill, anytime after she is the official nominee and they can't substitute a new name on the ballet would suffice. States have strange rules on when you can change things like that. Once she is definitely on the ballot, let it fly. Can a nominee be remove before inauguration? Or would they have to swear her in so they could impeach her? What the VP then be sworn in? |
|
| Author: | GoldenJet [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
I'm going to go out on a limb and say they don't really have dick. If she actually had any one of the skeletons hanging in her closet that the Clinton haters claim she has, she wouldn't even be running. The Clintons were viewed as the ultimate political enemy to the Right, starting all the way back in Arkansas. Hillary's ambitions to achieve the highest office was recognized early on and the anti-Clinton industry kept on churning out faux scandals...none of which have actually stuck...but enough are out there that idiots figure some of it must be true. 
|
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
#GoldenJetisACuck #GoldenJetGetsSmashedByTrumpTrain #GoldenJetisAFag |
|
| Author: | GoldenJet [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
Feign some more outrage SomeGuy and keep drinking the stupid-aide. |
|
| Author: | Rod [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
GoldenJet wrote: Well that's certainly a leap A leap to what? From the New York Times, not some whacko right-wing website: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/ca ... .html?_r=0 |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
TurdFerguson wrote: 312player wrote: When would the best time be to release the emails to cause the most damage? I'm thinking 10 days before the election would do the most damage and hand Trump the presidency...I wouldn't release them just yet..its too early If it is truly a poison pill, anytime after she is the official nominee and they can't substitute a new name on the ballet would suffice. States have strange rules on when you can change things like that. Once she is definitely on the ballot, let it fly. Can a nominee be remove before inauguration? Or would they have to swear her in so they could impeach her? What the VP then be sworn in? They'd sweep it under the rug by election day, its too soon...I bet he's got dirt on the foundation and correspondence to her lesbian lover...those two alone would sink her campaign. |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
It does seem questionable that a person whose goal it is to expose truth would tease his information like it is the season ending cliffhanger of a tv drama |
|
| Author: | GoldenJet [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: GoldenJet wrote: Well that's certainly a leap A leap to what? From the New York Times, not some whacko right-wing website: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/ca ... .html?_r=0 http://www.businessinsider.com/everythi ... dal-2015-4 http://www.factcheck.org/2015/04/no-vet ... nium-deal/ Secretary of State's office was just one of 9 offices that thought the deal was fine. The only one with actual veto power was the potus. Do you think there was a grand conspiracy across all 9 major offices of the executive branch? |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
GoldenJet wrote: http://www.businessinsider.com/everything-we-know-about-the-hillary-clinton-russia-uranium-scandal-2015-4 http://www.factcheck.org/2015/04/no-vet ... nium-deal/ Secretary of State's office was just one of 9 offices that thought the deal was fine. The only one with actual veto power was the potus. Do you think there was a grand conspiracy across all 9 major offices of the executive branch?
|
|
| Author: | Nas [ Tue Jul 26, 2016 12:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Julian Assange |
SomeGuy wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: She sold them our fucking uranium fields. As Secretary of State she approved the sale of a large quantity of uranium ore via UraniumOne. After it was OK'd the facilitator of the deal (a bank) made sure to donate a few cool millions to the Clinton Foundation. After the transfer and sale were finished that bank then went to give Bill Clinton a few hundred thousand smackers to come and give a 30 min pep talk. Totally normal. #CognitiveDissonanceForClinton. #ResetButton #CrookedHillary #LibyaForSidBlumenthal #TrumpTrain2016 I knew that you were a Trump guy. #TrumpTheEstablishment |
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|