Hank Scorpio wrote:
Nomination denied. I don't care if she's killed hundreds of innocent people.
This guy gets it.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Gal Gadot https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=109700 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Ogie Oglethorpe [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Gal Gadot |
apparently she is a Mossad agent (if you think the Lebanese press is to be taken seriously that is) which I guess makes her a terrorist. https://www.timesofisrael.com/lebanese- ... sad-agent/ |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Agreed. |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Perhaps yes. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_ ... _terrorism |
|
| Author: | Ogie Oglethorpe [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
long time guy wrote: yawn, already debunked thoroughly in other threads, go find a new hobby. |
|
| Author: | Ogie Oglethorpe [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
also let's make today a good time to point out that LTG has no problem with Muslims being killed unless he can blame Israel for it. He seems to love defending Iran, which is responsible for the Yemeni and Syrian Civil Wars. Each of those Civil Wars in just a few short years has killed more people than the entire century of the Arab-Israeli conflict. I guess LTG only cares about dead Muslims if he can blame Israel or the US for their deaths. |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote: long time guy wrote: yawn, already debunked thoroughly in other threads, go find a new hobby. Debunked yet you continually make references to it nonetheless. |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote: also let's make today a good time to point out that LTG has no problem with Muslims being killed unless he can blame Israel for it. He seems to love defending Iran, which is responsible for the Yemeni and Syrian Civil Wars. Each of those Civil Wars in just a few short years has killed more people than the entire century of the Arab-Israeli conflict. I guess LTG only cares about dead Muslims if he can blame Israel or the US for their deaths. So U.S. actions are justifiable because Muslims kill Muslims? Ok. At least you are clear on the amount of value that you place on the life of Muslims. Thanks. |
|
| Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
long time guy wrote: Ogie Oglethorpe wrote: long time guy wrote: yawn, already debunked thoroughly in other threads, go find a new hobby. Debunked yet you continually make references to it nonetheless. Because YOU keep responding with weak-ass efforts to prove what gas already been disproved, almost literally every single time he trolls you with it. |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: Because YOU keep responding with weak-ass efforts to prove what gas already been disproved Jews aren't immortal. |
|
| Author: | Ogie Oglethorpe [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
long time guy wrote: Ogie Oglethorpe wrote: also let's make today a good time to point out that LTG has no problem with Muslims being killed unless he can blame Israel for it. He seems to love defending Iran, which is responsible for the Yemeni and Syrian Civil Wars. Each of those Civil Wars in just a few short years has killed more people than the entire century of the Arab-Israeli conflict. I guess LTG only cares about dead Muslims if he can blame Israel or the US for their deaths. So U.S. actions are justifiable because Muslims kill Muslims? Ok. At least you are clear on the amount of value that you place on the life of Muslims. Thanks. You only care about Muslims when you can use them as political pawns for your ideology. Let that sink in. You don't give a fuck about them until a party you don't like is the one who does the killing. Then you jump up and cry over their bodies to score points. However when they die in conflicts with other Arab/Muslim nations (which represent 90%+ of all Arabs killed in wars) you don't give two shits. |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: long time guy wrote: Ogie Oglethorpe wrote: long time guy wrote: yawn, already debunked thoroughly in other threads, go find a new hobby. Debunked yet you continually make references to it nonetheless. Because YOU keep responding with weak-ass efforts to prove what gas already been disproved, almost literally every single time he trolls you with it. It took all of 4 minutes for you to provide your customary defense. You're becoming a tad bit slow on the uptick. Since it's fairly established that you're a bit lacking in the comprehension area i'll simply allow my source and the information contained in it to marinate a little. |
|
| Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Nomination denied. I don't care if she's killed hundreds of innocent people. |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote: long time guy wrote: Ogie Oglethorpe wrote: also let's make today a good time to point out that LTG has no problem with Muslims being killed unless he can blame Israel for it. He seems to love defending Iran, which is responsible for the Yemeni and Syrian Civil Wars. Each of those Civil Wars in just a few short years has killed more people than the entire century of the Arab-Israeli conflict. I guess LTG only cares about dead Muslims if he can blame Israel or the US for their deaths. So U.S. actions are justifiable because Muslims kill Muslims? Ok. At least you are clear on the amount of value that you place on the life of Muslims. Thanks. You only care about Muslims when you can use them as political pawns for your ideology. Let that sink in. You don't give a fuck about them until a party you don't like is the one who does the killing. Then you jump up and cry over their bodies to score points. However when they die in conflicts with other Arab/Muslim nations (which represent 90%+ of all Arabs killed in wars) you don't give two shits. No I'm not Arabian nor Muslim and I simply tend to believe that the U.S. should take an isolationist approach. Let them sort out their own affairs as we allowed them to do pre 1945. I don't believe that the U.S. really gives too fucks either. If we did we'd stop the silly ass drone strikes which kill far more civilians than terrorists each year. I understand Muslim on Muslim violence to some degree and also the divisions within the different sects. U.S. interventions have never been designed to quell that. Maybe if they were then it'd be more acceptable. |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Hank Scorpio wrote: Nomination denied. I don't care if she's killed hundreds of innocent people. The woman can do no wrong. If she did wrong, she wouldn't be that beautiful. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
That's awesome if true. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Hank Scorpio wrote: Nomination denied. I don't care if she's killed hundreds of innocent people. This guy gets it.
|
|
| Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Hank Scorpio wrote: Nomination denied. I don't care if she's killed hundreds of innocent people. This I don't care. |
|
| Author: | W_Z [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
|
|
| Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
IMU wrote: Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: Because YOU keep responding with weak-ass efforts to prove what gas already been disproved Jews aren't immortal. Well THAT is an incredibly unfortunate typo. |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 11:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Also, a lot of drooling going on for a hard 7. |
|
| Author: | chaspoppcap [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 1:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Not another thread with these two going at it over the same topic again? |
|
| Author: | KDdidit [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 1:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Its a thread specifically created to troll LTG, I'll allow it. |
|
| Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 2:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
IMU wrote: Also, a lot of drooling going on for a hard 7. 7?? You're a tough critic. I think she's a Hollywood 9. If you saw her randomly walking on the street, your jaw would drop. |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 2:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Hank Scorpio wrote: IMU wrote: Also, a lot of drooling going on for a hard 7. 7?? You're a tough critic. I think she's a Hollywood 9. If you saw her randomly walking on the street, your jaw would drop. Maybe in Indiana. She wouldn't even stand out in a crowd of nurses leaving their shifts in the Illinois Medical District. |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 3:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Great body. Nomination denied. |
|
| Author: | likemarsen [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 3:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
I thought it was because she slut shamed her former roommate who was raped. |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 3:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Terry's Peeps wrote: Hank Scorpio wrote: Nomination denied. I don't care if she's killed hundreds of innocent people. This guy gets it. This is a good indication of why IMU is incorrect. Isla Fisher is a very cute woman and probably hot to some. She doesn't look to be in the same species as Gadot when they stand next to each other. |
|
| Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 4:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
good dolphin wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Hank Scorpio wrote: Nomination denied. I don't care if she's killed hundreds of innocent people. This guy gets it. This is a good indication of why IMU is incorrect. Isla Fisher is a very cute woman and probably hot to some. She doesn't look to be in the same species as Gadot when they stand next to each other. IMU just doesn't like her because he's intimidated by women taller than he is. Also, she's not Asian or driving a hot hatch. |
|
| Author: | IMU [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 4:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
Gal Gadot is not taller than me. You have me confused with Colonel Angus with regards to asian women. |
|
| Author: | shakes [ Mon Nov 27, 2017 4:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Gal Gadot |
sjboyd0137 wrote: good dolphin wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Hank Scorpio wrote: Nomination denied. I don't care if she's killed hundreds of innocent people. This guy gets it. This is a good indication of why IMU is incorrect. Isla Fisher is a very cute woman and probably hot to some. She doesn't look to be in the same species as Gadot when they stand next to each other. IMU just doesn't like her because he's intimidated by women taller than he is. Also, she's not Asian or driving a hot hatch. you're putting way too much thought into this. It's obvious why IMU doesn't like her and it has nothing to do with her height. Check her passport. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|