| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Should Seacrest be Banned? YES SAYS ALL https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=110097 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | America [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Should Seacrest be Banned? YES SAYS ALL |
How many great threads can this guy be allowed to ruin? The QCP thread was hilarious, genuine and gentlemanly for its entire existence until this moron site admin barged in and shitted it all up. Now its a wasteland of bad thoughts and some dumb personal beef with JLN that was totally unnecessary. |
|
| Author: | sinicalypse [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
I took the ban for him. I'm back now tho =\ |
|
| Author: | Regular Reader [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
The 12th arrondissement has checked in. DuPage county is on the clock. |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
Regular Reader wrote: The 12th arrondissement has checked in. DuPage county is on the clock. I've spent a lot of years in that county. Have a great organization there. The absolute best |
|
| Author: | Regular Reader [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: The 12th arrondissement has checked in. DuPage county is on the clock. I've spent a lot of years in that county. Have a great organization there. The absolute best Historic voter fraud ran rampant I'm sure |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
I would not be in favor of this banning. Seacrest is a talented poster with potential. 2018 could be the year he puts it all together. |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: The 12th arrondissement has checked in. DuPage county is on the clock. I've spent a lot of years in that county. Have a great organization there. The absolute best Historic voter fraud ran rampant I'm sure The best voter fraud. |
|
| Author: | Regular Reader [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Seacrest wrote: Regular Reader wrote: The 12th arrondissement has checked in. DuPage county is on the clock. I've spent a lot of years in that county. Have a great organization there. The absolute best Historic voter fraud ran rampant I'm sure The best voter fraud. 
|
|
| Author: | beni hanna [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
FavreFan wrote: Seacrest is a talented poster with potential. 2018 could be the year he puts it all together. What is his Quality Posts above Replacement Poster (QPARP) score? |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
beni hanna wrote: FavreFan wrote: Seacrest is a talented poster with potential. 2018 could be the year he puts it all together. What is his Quality Posts above Replacement Poster (QPARP) score? Is that different from QCP? |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
beni hanna wrote: FavreFan wrote: Seacrest is a talented poster with potential. 2018 could be the year he puts it all together. What is his Quality Posts above Replacement Poster (QPARP) score? 2013: 1.9 2014: 2.1 2015: 3.2 2016: 6.9 2017: 2.4 He had a disappointing 2017 year after hitting career highs in 2016. Here's hoping for a bounce back 2018. |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
FavreFan wrote: beni hanna wrote: FavreFan wrote: Seacrest is a talented poster with potential. 2018 could be the year he puts it all together. What is his Quality Posts above Replacement Poster (QPARP) score? 2013: 1.9 2014: 2.1 2015: 3.2 2016: 6.9 2017: 2.4 He had a disappointing 2017 year after hitting career highs in 2016. Here's hoping for a bounce back 2018. If JORR was a better manager, this would never have happened this season. |
|
| Author: | beni hanna [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
Seacrest wrote: beni hanna wrote: FavreFan wrote: Seacrest is a talented poster with potential. 2018 could be the year he puts it all together. What is his Quality Posts above Replacement Poster (QPARP) score? Is that different from QCP? Based on the QPARP FavreFan is providing, QCP may have been a mistake... 
|
|
| Author: | spmack [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
Yes. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
Seacrest wrote: FavreFan wrote: beni hanna wrote: FavreFan wrote: Seacrest is a talented poster with potential. 2018 could be the year he puts it all together. What is his Quality Posts above Replacement Poster (QPARP) score? 2013: 1.9 2014: 2.1 2015: 3.2 2016: 6.9 2017: 2.4 He had a disappointing 2017 year after hitting career highs in 2016. Here's hoping for a bounce back 2018. If JORR was a better manager, this would never have happened this season.
|
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
spmack wrote: Yes. 
|
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
Denied. It's good to have a Jesus freak in our little corner of the internet. keep the personalities diverse. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
spmack wrote: Yes. No. |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
spmack wrote: Yes. The Prodigal Brother has returned! |
|
| Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
spmack wrote: Yes. Well, if Kamps thinks it, it must be wrong... |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
spmack wrote: Yes. Who unbanned you? |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
Kirkwood wrote: Denied. It's good to have a Jesus freak in our little corner of the internet. keep the personalities diverse. Only God can judge us, and Seacrest. |
|
| Author: | Furious Styles [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 4:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
Maybe a temporary ban during Rick's contest. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Kirkwood wrote: Denied. It's good to have a Jesus freak in our little corner of the internet. keep the personalities diverse. Only God can judge us, and Seacrest. Indeed. May Seacrest have a blessed day for remainder of 2017. |
|
| Author: | beni hanna [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
Douchebag wrote: spmack wrote: Yes. For all you young posters out there, this is a prime example of how to keep your QPARP up. Spmack followed a tried and true formula for high QPARP. Brevity is appreciated by QPARP statisticians. Douchebag followed up Spmack's gem with a gem of his own. Zero words and eyepopping gif. Gets the statisticians vote every time. |
|
| Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
beni hanna wrote: Douchebag wrote: spmack wrote: Yes. For all you young posters out there, this is a prime example of how to keep your QPARP up. Spmack followed a tried and true formula for high QPARP. Brevity is appreciated by QPARP statisticians. Douchebag followed up Spmack's gem with a gem of his own. Zero words and eyepopping gif. Gets the statisticians vote every time. Why would statisticians be voting? Wouldn't they just look up the quantifiable stats and assign a number? 
|
|
| Author: | beni hanna [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
Hank Scorpio wrote: beni hanna wrote: Douchebag wrote: spmack wrote: Yes. For all you young posters out there, this is a prime example of how to keep your QPARP up. Spmack followed a tried and true formula for high QPARP. Brevity is appreciated by QPARP statisticians. Douchebag followed up Spmack's gem with a gem of his own. Zero words and eyepopping gif. Gets the statisticians vote every time. Why would statisticians be voting? Wouldn't they just look up the quantifiable stats and assign a number? Will we accept positive scoring? |
|
| Author: | Regular Reader [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
spmack wrote: Yes. Look who's back!!! 
|
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Kirkwood wrote: Denied. It's good to have a Jesus freak in our little corner of the internet. keep the personalities diverse. Only God can judge us, and myself.. FIXED |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Dec 27, 2017 5:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Should Seacrest be Banned? |
Regular Reader wrote: spmack wrote: Yes. Look who's back!!! Is now a bad time to break up this little love fest and ask for voter ID's from the both of you? |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|