| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Deerfield, IL https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=111807 |
Page 1 of 6 |
| Author: | SuperNintendoHjalmarsson [ Wed Apr 04, 2018 7:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Deerfield, IL |
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/video/de ... vi-AAvtFZj this ban openly includes semi automatic rifles and even pistols with magazines with capacity over 10 rounds. Are people willingly becoming retarded? Or, do they actually think this is correct/even lawful? Bernstein will be happy until scumbags start crawling all over the neighborhood looking to get inside the gated communities |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Wed Apr 04, 2018 7:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Good for them. |
|
| Author: | SuperNintendoHjalmarsson [ Wed Apr 04, 2018 7:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
the scumbags, right? |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Apr 04, 2018 7:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Terry's Peeps wrote: Good for them. Yup. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Wed Apr 04, 2018 7:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
No. Deerfield. |
|
| Author: | Baby McNown [ Wed Apr 04, 2018 7:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Maybe they should ban texting and driving. |
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Wed Apr 04, 2018 8:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Deerfield has been a hotbed of automatic rifle fire. This should stem the bloodshed. |
|
| Author: | KDdidit [ Wed Apr 04, 2018 8:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Maybe they can appeal if they regulate their militia better. |
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Wed Apr 04, 2018 8:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
By the way... 1911s win again. |
|
| Author: | Hussra [ Wed Apr 04, 2018 8:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
PR Stunt. Deerfield trying to get out from under Bannockburn's shadow. |
|
| Author: | ToxicMasculinity [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 2:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Darkside wrote: By the way... 1911s win again. *jams after first shot* |
|
| Author: | DAC [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 5:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: Good for them. Yup. This Baby McNown wrote: Maybe they should ban texting and driving. I agree that this is a major problem as well. |
|
| Author: | hnd [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 8:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
hilarious. |
|
| Author: | Psycory [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 10:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
If you are going to protest, I can suggest a great lunch place. Just leave your guns outside or hidden. |
|
| Author: | Ogie Oglethorpe [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Darkside wrote: By the way... 1911s win again. 7+1 FTW |
|
| Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Psycory wrote: If you are going to protest, I can suggest a great lunch place. Just leave your guns outside or hidden. Il Forno? |
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
But no one is coming for your guns, right? If you dont turn in banned weapons you get fined $1000/day. Will they compensate you for your confiscated property? So they're making hundreds of law abiding people felons overnight. That sounds fair. I'm not sure that it's legal to confiscate property without compensation. This will surely be challenged. It will be interesting. |
|
| Author: | Ogie Oglethorpe [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Darkside wrote: But no one is coming for your guns, right? If you dont turn in banned weapons you get fined $1000/day. Will they compensate you for your confiscated property? So they're making hundreds of law abiding people felons overnight. That sounds fair. I'm not sure that it's legal to confiscate property without compensation. This will surely be challenged. It will be interesting. All this ordinance will do in the end is cost Deerfield 6 figures in court costs |
|
| Author: | Dewskie [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
I fail to see how this is a bad thing. What civilian needs this shit? Shotguns are way more fun anyway. |
|
| Author: | SuperMario [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Dewskie wrote: I fail to see how this is a bad thing. What civilian needs this shit? Shotguns are way more fun anyway. What civilian needs a 600 HP car? |
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Dewskie wrote: I fail to see how this is a bad thing. What civilian needs this shit? Shotguns are way more fun anyway. Were we dont have a bill of needs we have a bill of rights. We shouldn't enter into the needs debate. Trust me in Deerfield hardly anyone "needs" the property they posess. If you fail to see how it's a bad thing I can't help you. You should probably think about property confiscation without compensation and remove the word weapon from the equation and see what you come up with. |
|
| Author: | Ogie Oglethorpe [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Just as a frame of reference, this law would ban most 9 mm handguns since most of them carry over 10 rounds. There is no way this law survives legal challenges, especially with the fines levied against lawfully purchased firearms. |
|
| Author: | SuperMario [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote: Just as a frame of reference, this law would ban most 9 mm handguns since most of them carry over 10 rounds. There is no way this law survives legal challenges, especially with the fines levied against lawfully purchased firearms. Yeah, like you said, I hope the residents of Deerfield are happy their tax dollars will be going to high dollar lawfirms for all the suits this will bring. Money well spent. |
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
For the record the crime rate in deerfield is absurdly low. This wasn't to solve a problem. They're legislating away problems they dont have. And it's going to end up costing the town a bunch of money. |
|
| Author: | Ogie Oglethorpe [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Darkside wrote: For the record the crime rate in deerfield is absurdly low. This wasn't to solve a problem. They're legislating away problems they dont have. And it's going to end up costing the town a bunch of money. It's expensive virtue signaling and nothing more |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 11:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Not so fast.... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-capacity_magazine_ban |
|
| Author: | SuperMario [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 12:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Darkside wrote: For the record the crime rate in deerfield is absurdly low. This wasn't to solve a problem. They're legislating away problems they dont have. And it's going to end up costing the town a bunch of money. It's feel good legislation. It reminds me of the time Vermont decided to ban all frack mines in their state. And at the time of the legislation, there were no current or proposed mines. But they wanted to be at the forefront! 
|
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 12:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
I thought people were mad that legislation in the wake of Parkland was going after the "assault rifles" when handguns were a bigger problem. Now a town goes after handguns as well and that is bad too? It's almost as if some people don't want ANYTHING to be done. |
|
| Author: | Juice's Lecture Notes [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 12:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Remember "nobody is coming for your guns"? Quote: "It shall be unlawful to possess, bear, manufacture, sell, transfer, transport, store or keep any assault weapon in the Village." Is this going after people's guns? Can we finally admit that modern gun control is actually about going after and taking people's guns? |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Thu Apr 05, 2018 12:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Deerfield, IL |
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote: Remember "nobody is coming for your guns"? Quote: "It shall be unlawful to possess, bear, manufacture, sell, transfer, transport, store or keep any assault weapon in the Village." Is this going after people's guns? Can we finally admit that modern gun control is actually about going after and taking people's guns? Certain guns, yes. Isn't that what it has always been? |
|
| Page 1 of 6 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|