Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

NFL RULES COMMITTEE
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=115854
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Panther pislA [ Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:37 pm ]
Post subject:  NFL RULES COMMITTEE

Hitting a goal post should be 5 points, and the crossbar should be 7.

Those are very low percentage shots - extremely tough to do.

Author:  Juice's Lecture Notes [ Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NFL RULES COMMITTEE

Still baffled by the notion that an incomplete pass on review cannot be turned into possession because there was a fumble—which necessitates possession—without a clear recovery before the stoppage of play. That's just stupid.

"Yeah, you had the ball and fumbled it, but since nobody recovered the fumble, you never possessed it in the first place."

Author:  leashyourkids [ Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NFL RULES COMMITTEE

Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Still baffled by the notion that an incomplete pass on review cannot be turned into possession because there was a fumble—which necessitates possession—without a clear recovery before the stoppage of play. That's just stupid.

"Yeah, you had the ball and fumbled it, but since nobody recovered the fumble, you never possessed it in the first place."


I think they made that shit up. Or is there an actual rule that says that?

Author:  pittmike [ Mon Jan 07, 2019 2:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NFL RULES COMMITTEE

leashyourkids wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Still baffled by the notion that an incomplete pass on review cannot be turned into possession because there was a fumble—which necessitates possession—without a clear recovery before the stoppage of play. That's just stupid.

"Yeah, you had the ball and fumbled it, but since nobody recovered the fumble, you never possessed it in the first place."


I think they made that shit up. Or is there an actual rule that says that?


That is what I thought. I thought this never happened and this guy is just talking. I mean its a catch and fumble but no recovery so its a incomplete. :lol: I would have understood and respected it more if they said they were calling a do over.

Author:  Brick [ Mon Jan 07, 2019 3:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NFL RULES COMMITTEE

leashyourkids wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Still baffled by the notion that an incomplete pass on review cannot be turned into possession because there was a fumble—which necessitates possession—without a clear recovery before the stoppage of play. That's just stupid.

"Yeah, you had the ball and fumbled it, but since nobody recovered the fumble, you never possessed it in the first place."


I think they made that shit up. Or is there an actual rule that says that?

The amazing part is that if the ball had gone out of bounds it certainly would have been a catch.

Author:  sjboyd0137 [ Mon Jan 07, 2019 3:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NFL RULES COMMITTEE

leashyourkids wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Still baffled by the notion that an incomplete pass on review cannot be turned into possession because there was a fumble—which necessitates possession—without a clear recovery before the stoppage of play. That's just stupid.

"Yeah, you had the ball and fumbled it, but since nobody recovered the fumble, you never possessed it in the first place."


I think they made that shit up. Or is there an actual rule that says that?


Legit rule, apparently


Author:  Big Chicagoan [ Mon Jan 07, 2019 3:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NFL RULES COMMITTEE

sjboyd0137 wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Still baffled by the notion that an incomplete pass on review cannot be turned into possession because there was a fumble—which necessitates possession—without a clear recovery before the stoppage of play. That's just stupid.

"Yeah, you had the ball and fumbled it, but since nobody recovered the fumble, you never possessed it in the first place."


I think they made that shit up. Or is there an actual rule that says that?


Legit rule, apparently




Sounds like an NFL rule. Doesn't make sense and hugely impacts a playoff game (tuck rule).

Eagles will now win the Superbowl.

Author:  Jaw Breaker [ Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NFL RULES COMMITTEE

leashyourkids wrote:
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
Still baffled by the notion that an incomplete pass on review cannot be turned into possession because there was a fumble—which necessitates possession—without a clear recovery before the stoppage of play. That's just stupid.

"Yeah, you had the ball and fumbled it, but since nobody recovered the fumble, you never possessed it in the first place."


I think they made that shit up. Or is there an actual rule that says that?


Yeah, later in the game they said they asked the replay officials for a clarification and they said that if the call on the field was incomplete, but there was no immediate recovery, then the play would be ruled as incomplete even if review found it would have been a catch. Kind of stupid....it should be that if the DEFENSE didn't pick it up, and it's deemed a catch during review, the offense retains possession at the spot of the catch (similar to a fumble out of bounds).

Author:  W_Z [ Mon Jan 07, 2019 4:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: NFL RULES COMMITTEE

that rule controversy smacks of the "is it a catch" endzone rule that the NFL rectified over the off-season. i think this, too, will either be squelched or fine-tuned.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/