Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
bruce willis https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=117590 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | billypootons [ Wed May 15, 2019 9:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | bruce willis |
guy sets up short of the rubber and still bounces the ball to home.... what a terrible effort |
Author: | Peoria Matt [ Wed May 15, 2019 9:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
That was as bad as Hudson Hawk. |
Author: | 312player [ Wed May 15, 2019 9:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
He's 65 |
Author: | Spaulding [ Wed May 15, 2019 9:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
312player wrote: He's 65 That was my thought too. |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Wed May 15, 2019 9:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
Peoria Matt wrote: That was as bad as Hudson Hawk. That's one of the movies that I'm embarrassed to admit that I watch whenever I fly through the channels and find it's on. |
Author: | Beardown [ Wed May 15, 2019 9:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
Here's baba boey. Howard Stern and his guys road his ass for this. Still do to this day. Terrible. Gary was in his 40s when he fucked it up. Worst first pitch ever!!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfLIyT8HExY |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Wed May 15, 2019 9:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
Beardown wrote: The worst first pitch was baba boey. Stern and the guys road his ass for this. Still do to this day. Terrible. Gary was in his 40s when he fucked it up. Worst first pitch ever!!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wfLIyT8HExY You've never seen Carl Lewis' effort. |
Author: | 312player [ Wed May 15, 2019 10:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
John wall and 50 cent were worst I've seen |
Author: | beni hanna [ Wed May 15, 2019 11:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
Cade Mcnown for the win. |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Thu May 16, 2019 12:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
Regular Reader wrote: Peoria Matt wrote: That was as bad as Hudson Hawk. That's one of the movies that I'm embarrassed to admit that I watch whenever I fly through the channels and find it's on. It's a very entertaining movie. Screw everybody that disparages it. Jerks. |
Author: | GoPackGo [ Thu May 16, 2019 6:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
Don Tiny wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Peoria Matt wrote: That was as bad as Hudson Hawk. That's one of the movies that I'm embarrassed to admit that I watch whenever I fly through the channels and find it's on. It's a very entertaining movie. Screw everybody that disparages it. Jerks. Agree, Hudson Hawk was a ton of fun and entertaining as hell. I mean c'mon - "Bunny... ball ball...." Not every movie needs to be Oscar caliber. |
Author: | The Hawk [ Thu May 16, 2019 11:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
Peoria Matt wrote: That was as bad as Hudson Hawk. I loved that movie. It was so bad, it was funny. |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Thu May 16, 2019 11:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
GoPackGo wrote: Don Tiny wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Peoria Matt wrote: That was as bad as Hudson Hawk. That's one of the movies that I'm embarrassed to admit that I watch whenever I fly through the channels and find it's on. It's a very entertaining movie. Screw everybody that disparages it. Jerks. Agree, Hudson Hawk was a ton of fun and entertaining as hell. I mean c'mon - "Bunny... ball ball...." Not every movie needs to be Oscar caliber. I'll torture you so slowly, you'll think it's a career! |
Author: | 312player [ Thu May 16, 2019 12:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
GoPackGo wrote: Don Tiny wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Peoria Matt wrote: That was as bad as Hudson Hawk. That's one of the movies that I'm embarrassed to admit that I watch whenever I fly through the channels and find it's on. It's a very entertaining movie. Screw everybody that disparages it. Jerks. Agree, Hudson Hawk was a ton of fun and entertaining as hell. I mean c'mon - "Bunny... ball ball...." Not every movie needs to be Oscar caliber. Most best pictures suck, they hit on 3 a decade. Maybe 4 at most. Look at this horseshit. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.today. ... tdna107617 |
Author: | Peoria Matt [ Thu May 16, 2019 12:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
Hudson Hawk fans will not be silenced ! |
Author: | Tad Queasy [ Thu May 16, 2019 1:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
This woman during the New York Marathon: |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Thu May 16, 2019 1:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
Tad Queasy wrote: This woman during the New York Marathon: |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Thu May 16, 2019 2:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
312player wrote: GoPackGo wrote: Don Tiny wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Peoria Matt wrote: That was as bad as Hudson Hawk. That's one of the movies that I'm embarrassed to admit that I watch whenever I fly through the channels and find it's on. It's a very entertaining movie. Screw everybody that disparages it. Jerks. Agree, Hudson Hawk was a ton of fun and entertaining as hell. I mean c'mon - "Bunny... ball ball...." Not every movie needs to be Oscar caliber. Most best pictures suck, they hit on 3 a decade. Maybe 4 at most. Look at this horseshit. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.today. ... tdna107617 I haven't seen a Best Picture Oscar winner more recent than the 2007 champ. |
Author: | Drunk Squirrel [ Thu May 16, 2019 2:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
2011 and 5 minutes if that damn the Shape of water. In addition, I hold no desire to see many on the list in recent years. |
Author: | 312player [ Thu May 16, 2019 3:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
You missed out on No country for old men and Slumdog? Both are fantastic.you should check em out. |
Author: | 312player [ Thu May 16, 2019 3:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
Kinda disrespectful with no capitalization in thread title btw. |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Thu May 16, 2019 4:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
Regular Reader wrote: 312player wrote: GoPackGo wrote: Don Tiny wrote: Regular Reader wrote: Peoria Matt wrote: That was as bad as Hudson Hawk. That's one of the movies that I'm embarrassed to admit that I watch whenever I fly through the channels and find it's on. It's a very entertaining movie. Screw everybody that disparages it. Jerks. Agree, Hudson Hawk was a ton of fun and entertaining as hell. I mean c'mon - "Bunny... ball ball...." Not every movie needs to be Oscar caliber. Most best pictures suck, they hit on 3 a decade. Maybe 4 at most. Look at this horseshit. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.today. ... tdna107617 I haven't seen a Best Picture Oscar winner more recent than the 2007 champ. The only ones I've seen on that list were: 2013 2008 2004 1996 1995 1994 1992 1985 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 |
Author: | rogar6 [ Thu May 16, 2019 4:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
Seems like you'd want to get in a few practice pitches in somewhere off camera to avoid embarrassing moments like this. |
Author: | Drake LaRrieta [ Fri May 17, 2019 7:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
https://youtu.be/GcSIwBWiPoU Russell Wilson supposedly threw a 98 MPH opening pitch, but it wasn't a strike. |
Author: | pittmike [ Fri May 17, 2019 7:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: bruce willis |
Denied. Bruce Willis getting every bit of the best years of Demi Moore is an all time shoutout. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |