Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

New York Times
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=120326
Page 1 of 1

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:29 am ]
Post subject:  New York Times

The newspaper of record has become a complete embarrassment:

Quote:
In a break with convention, the editorial board has chosen to endorse two separate Democratic candidates for president. Amy Klobuchar and Elizabeth Warren


Way to take a stand.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/202 ... ement.html

Author:  Nas [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

Support women!

Author:  DAC [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

Denied

You can only get the 2020 presidential endorsement wrong by supporting the Trump. What a fucking clown.

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 9:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

You think the co-presidents have a chance of beating Trump?

DAC wrote:
Denied

You can only get the 2020 presidential endorsement wrong by supporting the Trump. What a fucking clown.

Author:  Peoria Matt [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

IT'S THEIR TURN

Author:  billypootons [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
You think the co-presidents have a chance of beating Trump?

DAC wrote:
Denied

You can only get the 2020 presidential endorsement wrong by supporting the Trump. What a fucking clown.


lol, i love newspaper endorsements. Still thinking they're opinion matters at the same time begging us to subscribe to their paper for 2 months for $0.99 total.

this isnt 1920, nobody give s a shit what a newspaper thinks.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

viewtopic.php?f=168&t=120327

Author:  Caller Bob [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:54 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

wow another great wfr thread,

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

Look who had it first.

Frank Coztansa wrote:
https://www.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=168&t=120327

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

The White Sox offseason has made you really testy.

Caller Bob wrote:
wow another great wfr thread,

Author:  Nardi [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

billypootons wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
You think the co-presidents have a chance of beating Trump?

DAC wrote:
Denied

You can only get the 2020 presidential endorsement wrong by supporting the Trump. What a fucking clown.


lol, i love newspaper endorsements. Still thinking they're opinion matters at the same time begging us to subscribe to their paper for 2 months for $0.99 total.

this isnt 1920, nobody give s a shit what a newspaper thinks.

Former newspaper. True, it was a newspaper in 1920.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 11:06 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Look who had it first.

Frank Coztansa wrote:
https://www.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=168&t=120327
I didn't start that thread, you twat.

Author:  Caller Bob [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 11:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
The White Sox offseason has made you really testy.

Caller Bob wrote:
wow another great wfr thread,

Good to see you sort of sober

Author:  Curious Hair [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 11:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

Ruffcorn's thread was first, but it was not in the Politics folder, nor did it make a poop joke.

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

Meaning you can’t tell time?

Frank Coztansa wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Look who had it first.

Frank Coztansa wrote:
https://www.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=168&t=120327
I didn't start that thread, you twat.

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

Avoiding the point I see.

Caller Bob wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
The White Sox offseason has made you really testy.

Caller Bob wrote:
wow another great wfr thread,

Good to see you sort of sober

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Meaning you can’t tell time?
Meaning you put this terrible thread in the wrong section.

And type your responses to quotes underneath the quote like a normal person.

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

So terrible that you can't stop posting in it. So terrible that another poster started a thread on the same topic. Quit being so miserable.

Frank Coztansa wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
Meaning you can’t tell time?
Meaning you put this terrible thread in the wrong section.

And type your responses to quotes underneath the quote like a normal person.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

Image

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:44 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: New York Times

Good argument today.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/