| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| "But he can run!" https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=123857 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | "But he can run!" |
|
|
|
| Author: | 312player [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
|
|
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
He sucks, but is better than Foles. |
|
| Author: | HawaiiYou [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
|
|
| Author: | Regular Reader [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
Dolphin will have a field day tomorrow. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
Frank Coztansa wrote: He sucks, but is better than Foles. To begin the season I said Foles is better, now I'm saying it's not clear who is better. Put Bray in, who gives a shit. Season from hell. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
Frank Coztansa wrote: He sucks, but is better than Foles. Correct. It’s funny vegan made this thread when this game is just further evidence in the long log of evidence that Mitch > Foles |
|
| Author: | conns7901 [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
Frank Coztansa wrote: He sucks, but is better than Foles. Yeah. It is clear Mitch really won the preseason competition. Which is sad. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
veganfan21 wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: He sucks, but is better than Foles. To begin the season I said Foles is better, now I'm saying it's not clear who is better. Put Bray in, who gives a shit. Season from hell. If it’s not clear who’s better between Foles and Mitch it’s because you don’t know what you watching and/or you think all QBs outside the top 10 are the same. Either way you need to learn to look at the game a bit more discerningly. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
FavreFan wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: He sucks, but is better than Foles. Correct. It’s funny vegan made this thread when this game is just further evidence in the long log of evidence that Mitch > Foles A pick six fumble and a perfectly tossed long ball to two GB players = "evidence"
|
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
veganfan21 wrote: now I'm saying it's not clear who is better. Damn. I didn't realize Covid made you go blind. Sorry to hear that dude.
|
|
| Author: | The Man [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
Frank Coztansa wrote: He sucks, but is better than Foles. If he is better there has to be something he does better. What does he do better than Foles? |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
MItch plays football better than Nick Foles does currently. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
veganfan21 wrote: FavreFan wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: He sucks, but is better than Foles. Correct. It’s funny vegan made this thread when this game is just further evidence in the long log of evidence that Mitch > Foles A pick six fumble and a perfectly tossed long ball to two GB players = "evidence" Are those the only two plays? Cuz I’ve counted a few more. And should we bring up your “PPG is the only stat matters” stance?
|
|
| Author: | HawaiiYou [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
He threw another int. This time with 3 guys covering the Bears WR. Foles doesn't even make that throw. Probably just throws it OOB. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
Rough stretch. Luckily he’ll still lead the Bears to more points tonight than Foles has on average this year. Another L for vegan. |
|
| Author: | The Man [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
Frank Coztansa wrote: MItch plays football better than Nick Foles does currently. So you have nothing. Foles is bad but he is better than Mitch. Mitch is not a NFL QB or back-up QB. Foles is at least a competent back-up. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
FavreFan wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: He sucks, but is better than Foles. Correct. It’s funny vegan made this thread when this game is just further evidence in the long log of evidence that Mitch > Foles This GB defense blows.. Mitch is not better than Foles. Nust like he's not better than Several other QBs you've said..your Mitch comparisons suck. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
Frank Coztansa wrote: MItch plays football better than Nick Foles does currently. Now it seems like you're just saying that to say it. He just threw two INTs directly to players surrounded by green shirts. For all his mobility, he's been sacked three times for a loss of 18. Sure you wanna stick to your guns? We have a dumbass under center. Shouldn't be too hard to say they both suck ass, which is what I conceded last week. |
|
| Author: | HawaiiYou [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
After watching tonight I would take Foles over Mitch. Foles is done i know but he's still better than 26 year old mitch. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
312player wrote: FavreFan wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: He sucks, but is better than Foles. Correct. It’s funny vegan made this thread when this game is just further evidence in the long log of evidence that Mitch > Foles This GB defense blows.. Mitch is not better than Foles. Nust like he's not better than Several other QBs you've said..your Mitch comparisons suck. You said Foles would be good this year. Don’t make me pull quotes tomorrow while sober. You forfeited your opinion on this debate Mitch is still better than Foles |
|
| Author: | Crick Ramp [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
Rodgers.. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
FavreFan wrote: Rough stretch. Luckily he’ll still lead the Bears to more points tonight than Foles has on average this year. Another L for vegan. This is Trump-esque type spin. "So grateful we lost the lawsuit in Pennsylvania, now we can take it to a higher court and get denied there too!" I'll accept your concession on (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
FavreFan wrote: 312player wrote: FavreFan wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: He sucks, but is better than Foles. Correct. It’s funny vegan made this thread when this game is just further evidence in the long log of evidence that Mitch > Foles This GB defense blows.. Mitch is not better than Foles. Nust like he's not better than Several other QBs you've said..your Mitch comparisons suck. You said Foles would be good this year. Don’t make me pull quotes tomorrow while sober. You forfeited your opinion on this debate Mitch is still better than Foles I thought the line would be better.. I've seen nothing that says Mitch is better. Foles would be killing it in Indianapolis. |
|
| Author: | HawaiiYou [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
The last 5 weeks I was asking this question on here: Shit, Foles is so bad, why don't they bring in mitch? It can't get any worse. Now I see my answer. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
veganfan21 wrote: FavreFan wrote: Rough stretch. Luckily he’ll still lead the Bears to more points tonight than Foles has on average this year. Another L for vegan. This is Trump-esque type spin. "So grateful we lost the lawsuit in Pennsylvania, now we can take it to a higher court and get denied there too!" I'll accept your concession on (Pro Bowl QB) Trubisky. Terrible analogy. You’re the one, not me, who made the dumbass comment that ppg is all that you look at. So if Mitch gets another TD at some point tonight he’s done better than your boy Foles on average has this year
|
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
312player wrote: FavreFan wrote: 312player wrote: FavreFan wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: He sucks, but is better than Foles. Correct. It’s funny vegan made this thread when this game is just further evidence in the long log of evidence that Mitch > Foles This GB defense blows.. Mitch is not better than Foles. Nust like he's not better than Several other QBs you've said..your Mitch comparisons suck. You said Foles would be good this year. Don’t make me pull quotes tomorrow while sober. You forfeited your opinion on this debate Mitch is still better than Foles I thought the line would be better.. I've seen nothing that says Mitch is better. Foles would be killing it in Indianapolis. Lol no this is dumb Foles has been terrible and Mitch has done better in the same conditions just as I said he would. Not Mitch’s fault your defense is getting fucking rocked tonight. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
Probably gonna have to take this to the think tank section but I'm not sure how ppg as a key metric is a "dumbass" thing to do. Are there other things outside of scoring that dictate who wins or loses? |
|
| Author: | HawaiiYou [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
why is this FF asshole in Bears business? fuck him. If the tables were turned I would not give a shit about the Packers. |
|
| Author: | Drunk Squirrel [ Sun Nov 29, 2020 10:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "But he can run!" |
312player wrote: FavreFan wrote: 312player wrote: FavreFan wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: He sucks, but is better than Foles. Correct. It’s funny vegan made this thread when this game is just further evidence in the long log of evidence that Mitch > Foles This GB defense blows.. Mitch is not better than Foles. Nust like he's not better than Several other QBs you've said..your Mitch comparisons suck. You said Foles would be good this year. Don’t make me pull quotes tomorrow while sober. You forfeited your opinion on this debate Mitch is still better than Foles I thought the line would be better.. I've seen nothing that says Mitch is better. Foles would be killing it in Indianapolis. Foles had been passable at best the majority of his career. Actually, he hasn’t even been passable. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|