Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Rex Huppke
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=125642
Page 1 of 1

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Wed Jun 16, 2021 8:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Rex Huppke



What a great journalist. Calls for censorship. Tucker had a segment about Julian Assange tonight. Someone who is 100x the journalist and man this d-bag will ever be.

Author:  This Ends in Antioch [ Wed Jun 16, 2021 8:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:


What a great journalist. Calls for censorship. Tucker had a segment about Julian Assange tonight. Someone who is 100x the journalist and man this d-bag will ever be.

What a bitch.

Author:  SpiralStairs [ Wed Jun 16, 2021 9:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

FWIW Huppke is a columnist, not a journalist. Still sucks tho.

Author:  Curious Hair [ Wed Jun 16, 2021 9:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

Huppke is possibly the purest form of shitlib. If you try to bring up that blue-state secession won't work because we don't produce enough food or energy without the red ones, you'd get a bunch of stuff about how many apples Washington state grows. (Red-state dirt still shouldn't be able to vote, though.)

Author:  shirtless driver [ Wed Jun 16, 2021 10:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

SpiralStairs wrote:
FWIW Huppke is a columnist, not a journalist. Still sucks tho.


FWIW, Rex describes himself as a 'journalist' at 8:58 this morning.
He seems like a run of the mill libtard jagoff to me, but I'm not much of a Tribune maven.

Author:  Rod [ Wed Jun 16, 2021 11:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

Curious Hair wrote:
Huppke is possibly the purest form of shitlib. If you try to bring up that blue-state secession won't work because we don't produce enough food or energy without the red ones, you'd get a bunch of stuff about how many apples Washington state grows. (Red-state dirt still shouldn't be able to vote, though.)



Dirt doesn't vote. I realize we've made it confusing by allowing The People to select senators. That should end. Maybe then it would be easier for very smart people like yourself to understand the system. The dumb ones won't ever get it.

Author:  Chet Coppock's Fur Coat [ Thu Jun 17, 2021 3:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

shirtless driver wrote:
SpiralStairs wrote:
FWIW Huppke is a columnist, not a journalist. Still sucks tho.


FWIW, Rex describes himself as a 'journalist' at 8:58 this morning.
He seems like a run of the mill libtard jagoff to me, but I'm not much of a Tribune maven.

Rex really needs to take the Tribune buyout and join Deadspin and fix everything.

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 1:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke



How was this guy given a national column? Newspapers deserve to fail if he is getting a paycheck.

Author:  denisdman [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 2:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:


How was this guy given a national column? Newspapers deserve to fail if he is getting a paycheck.


To be fair, you accused him of wanting censorship, and now you want to censor him. Let all voices speak, and we are smart enough to form our own opinions. Diversity of thought is great.

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 2:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

denisdman wrote:
WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:


How was this guy given a national column? Newspapers deserve to fail if he is getting a paycheck.


To be fair, you accused him of wanting censorship, and now you want to censor him. Let all voices speak, and we are smart enough to form our own opinions. Diversity of thought is great.


You can see that I'm not calling for his censorship, right? I'm saying he's a hack who keeps failing into higher profile roles. He isn't funny in the least. It has nothing to do with his political "opinions", which never deviate far from these guys good these guys bad. Gripping.

Author:  Rod [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 2:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

Curious Hair wrote:
Huppke is possibly the purest form of shitlib. If you try to bring up that blue-state secession won't work because we don't produce enough food or energy without the red ones, you'd get a bunch of stuff about how many apples Washington state grows. (Red-state dirt still shouldn't be able to vote, though.)



Red State dirt can't vote. What it can do- BY DESIGN- is slow down the fever dreams of progressives so we aren't sitting there ten months after the Squad jams through some legislation saying, "Now I understand why no one ever thought of that before." That and so California, New York, and Massachusetts don't get together to drain the Great Lakes.

Author:  Rod [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 2:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

The smear that Carlson is "ROOTING FOR PUTIN" is very easy to make since anyone making it would never "stoop so low" as to actually listen to what Carlson says. But these are the same people who consider leading progressive and hard Lefty Glenn Greenwald to be "Alt-Right." Greenwald hasn't changed. You have.

Author:  KDdidit [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 2:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

JORR replying to no one in particular to Stan for Tucker. Tucker hasn't changed. You have.

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 3:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The smear that Carlson is "ROOTING FOR PUTIN" is very easy to make since anyone making it would never "stoop so low" as to actually listen to what Carlson says. But these are the same people who consider leading progressive and hard Lefty Glenn Greenwald to be "Alt-Right." Greenwald hasn't changed. You have.


Greenwald has values deeper than identity politics, which is why he's hated now.

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 3:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

KDdidit wrote:
JORR replying to no one in particular to Stan for Tucker. Tucker hasn't changed. You have.


Except Tucker has changed. And the right/left dynamic has as well. Unless you are a shit lib.

Author:  Regular Reader [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 3:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

KDdidit wrote:
JORR replying to no one in particular to Stan for Tucker. Tucker hasn't changed. You have.

They both have. In the same direction.

Author:  KDdidit [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 3:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

WaitingforRuffcorn wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
JORR replying to no one in particular to Stan for Tucker. Tucker hasn't changed. You have.


Except Tucker has changed. And the right/left dynamic has as well. Unless you are a shit lib.


I can't believe my dumb generalization highlighting a meaningless statement has been argued with.

Author:  Rod [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 3:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

KDdidit wrote:
JORR replying to no one in particular to Stan for Tucker. Tucker hasn't changed. You have.



Actually, I replied to what Huppke said in the original post.

Author:  This Ends in Antioch [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 3:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

I think “ROOTING FOR PUTIN” ought to be “RUTIN’ FOR PUTIN.”

Seems like a missed opportunity.

Author:  SuperNintendoHjalmarsson [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 4:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

it is kind of funny how the left tends to claim that if you're conservative, than Tucker Carlson/Fox News must be our selected mouthpiece and that we agree with every stance and agenda.

i suppose the right does as well with CNN, except you're much more likely to see liberals regurgitating talking points they heard on CNN or from woke twitter.

"I'll be treated as I deserve, not as my father deserved. I'm Kilrain... And I damn all gentlemen. There is only one aristocracy... And that is right here."

Author:  Rod [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 4:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

SuperNintendoHjalmarsson wrote:
it is kind of funny how the left tends to claim that if you're conservative, than Tucker Carlson/Fox News must be our selected mouthpiece and that we agree with every stance and agenda.

i suppose the right does as well with CNN, except you're much more likely to see liberals regurgitating talking points they heard on CNN or from woke twitter.

"I'll be treated as I deserve, not as my father deserved. I'm Kilrain... And I damn all gentlemen. There is only one aristocracy... And that is right here."


Carlson isn't a Conservative and he's an outlier on Fox.

It's kind of odd to go from the same kind of warmongering and CIA mouthpiecing that is standard among the legacy media on the Jesse Watters show straight into the anti-war sentiment and distrust of the "intelligence community" that are staples of the Carlson show.

Author:  sinicalypse [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 4:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

Regular Reader wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
JORR replying to no one in particular to Stan for Tucker. Tucker hasn't changed. You have.

They both have. In the same direction.

one late night at the continental a wise man once told me when you're young if you don't lean left you have no heart... when you're older if you don't lean right you don't have any money.

Author:  Curious Hair [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 7:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

Tucker Carlson is a sheepdog for the Republican Party just as Krystal Ball and the DSA and all the alternative media figures are for the Democrats. He makes interesting points and gets funny riffs in, but his solution to any problem is always to elect more Republicans. After all, what else would it be? to elect fewer Republicans?

Author:  WaitingforRuffcorn [ Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Rex Huppke

Curious Hair wrote:
Tucker Carlson is a sheepdog for the Republican Party just as Krystal Ball and the DSA and all the alternative media figures are for the Democrats. He makes interesting points and gets funny riffs in, but his solution to any problem is always to elect more Republicans. After all, what else would it be? to elect fewer Republicans?


Yet Rex Huppke is the one with a platform. There is more wit in this post than in all of his columns.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/