| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| David Haugh https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=125983 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Aug 02, 2021 7:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | David Haugh |
we've seen his bad opinions plastered all over this place the past couple of days Today he outdoes himself by comparing Nick Madrigal to Darwin Barney. They aren't even a close comparison as their strengths are the opposite. However, he was specifically comparing their hitting ability. Nick Madrigal's career BA is 71 points higher than Barney, with similarly big disparities across the board. Even Mully was trying to reel him back in on the stupidity but he wouldn't stop. |
|
| Author: | Nardi [ Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: David Haugh |
good dolphin wrote: we've seen his bad opinions plastered all over this place the past couple of days Today he outdoes himself by comparing Nick Madrigal to Darwin Barney.  Madrigal has All Star potential. At worst, he's a major leaguer for 15 years. It's the best trade the Cubs made at the deadline. Despite his midgetry, his OPS+ is 114.
|
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: David Haugh |
good dolphin wrote: we've seen his bad opinions plastered all over this place the past couple of days Today he outdoes himself by comparing Nick Madrigal to Darwin Barney. They aren't even a close comparison as their strengths are the opposite. However, he was specifically comparing their hitting ability. Nick Madrigal's career BA is 71 points higher than Barney, with similarly big disparities across the board. Even Mully was trying to reel him back in on the stupidity but he wouldn't stop. He is just bad at his job. And makes Mully listenable, which is no small feat. |
|
| Author: | billypootons [ Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: David Haugh |
Seacrest wrote: good dolphin wrote: we've seen his bad opinions plastered all over this place the past couple of days Today he outdoes himself by comparing Nick Madrigal to Darwin Barney. They aren't even a close comparison as their strengths are the opposite. However, he was specifically comparing their hitting ability. Nick Madrigal's career BA is 71 points higher than Barney, with similarly big disparities across the board. Even Mully was trying to reel him back in on the stupidity but he wouldn't stop. He is just bad at his job. And makes Mully listenable, which is no small feat. how much cheaper was he than hanley? |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: David Haugh |
billypootons wrote: Seacrest wrote: good dolphin wrote: we've seen his bad opinions plastered all over this place the past couple of days Today he outdoes himself by comparing Nick Madrigal to Darwin Barney. They aren't even a close comparison as their strengths are the opposite. However, he was specifically comparing their hitting ability. Nick Madrigal's career BA is 71 points higher than Barney, with similarly big disparities across the board. Even Mully was trying to reel him back in on the stupidity but he wouldn't stop. He is just bad at his job. And makes Mully listenable, which is no small feat. how much cheaper was he than hanley? Not sure, Just know that Haugh took less money. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|