Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Matt LeFleur https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=127221 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | whitesoxfanfrank [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 8:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Matt LeFleur |
Nothing quite as dumb as playing the MVP in a meaningless game. Extremely stupid. |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
He knows the refs will protect Rodgers. |
Author: | Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
They’ll play until Rodgers gets his 10th 4,000 yard season and Adams sets the Packers record for yards. Both should happen before halftime. |
Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: They’ll play until Rodgers gets his 10th 4,000 yard season and Adams sets the Packers record for yards. Both should happen before halftime. I agree with the OP - don't risk it. No hate |
Author: | Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
veganfan21 wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: They’ll play until Rodgers gets his 10th 4,000 yard season and Adams sets the Packers record for yards. Both should happen before halftime. I agree with the OP - don't risk it. No hate They claim they are worried about losing their edge by having too much time off. I guess they feel that they can hedge their bets by treating it like a preseason game (get in a few reps and then head to the bench). I’ll admit to being a bit concerned but I’ll defer to the players and coaches on this. |
Author: | KDdidit [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
Yeah, I wouldn’t have him take 2 weeks off in a row either. |
Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: They’ll play until Rodgers gets his 10th 4,000 yard season and Adams sets the Packers record for yards. Both should happen before halftime. I agree with the OP - don't risk it. No hate They claim they are worried about losing their edge by having too much time off. I guess they feel that they can hedge their bets by treating it like a preseason game (get in a few reps and then head to the bench). I’ll admit to being a bit concerned but I’ll defer to the players and coaches on this. Simulate that during practice - go hard core, no tackling. |
Author: | badrogue17 [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: They’ll play until Rodgers gets his 10th 4,000 yard season and Adams sets the Packers record for yards. Both should happen before halftime. I agree with the OP - don't risk it. No hate They claim they are worried about losing their edge by having too much time off. I guess they feel that they can hedge their bets by treating it like a preseason game (get in a few reps and then head to the bench). I’ll admit to being a bit concerned but I’ll defer to the players and coaches on this. Nah, outraged fans and media know better and should dictate who plays |
Author: | Nas [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
It would be a shame if his foot got reinjured |
Author: | badrogue17 [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
Nas wrote: It would be a shame if his foot got reinjured Or reinfected with Covid !!! |
Author: | KDdidit [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
veganfan21 wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: They’ll play until Rodgers gets his 10th 4,000 yard season and Adams sets the Packers record for yards. Both should happen before halftime. I agree with the OP - don't risk it. No hate They claim they are worried about losing their edge by having too much time off. I guess they feel that they can hedge their bets by treating it like a preseason game (get in a few reps and then head to the bench). I’ll admit to being a bit concerned but I’ll defer to the players and coaches on this. Simulate that during practice - go hard core, no tackling. Yeah, like the Bears did that preseason they never played Mitch. That works. |
Author: | Tall Midget [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
KDdidit wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: They’ll play until Rodgers gets his 10th 4,000 yard season and Adams sets the Packers record for yards. Both should happen before halftime. I agree with the OP - don't risk it. No hate They claim they are worried about losing their edge by having too much time off. I guess they feel that they can hedge their bets by treating it like a preseason game (get in a few reps and then head to the bench). I’ll admit to being a bit concerned but I’ll defer to the players and coaches on this. Simulate that during practice - go hard core, no tackling. Yeah, like the Bears did that preseason they never played Mitch. That works. Did Mitch suck because they didn't play him in the preseason? Or were they hiding him in the preseason because he sucked? Seems like it was the latter, not the former. |
Author: | KDdidit [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 12:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
Tall Midget wrote: KDdidit wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote: They’ll play until Rodgers gets his 10th 4,000 yard season and Adams sets the Packers record for yards. Both should happen before halftime. I agree with the OP - don't risk it. No hate They claim they are worried about losing their edge by having too much time off. I guess they feel that they can hedge their bets by treating it like a preseason game (get in a few reps and then head to the bench). I’ll admit to being a bit concerned but I’ll defer to the players and coaches on this. Simulate that during practice - go hard core, no tackling. Yeah, like the Bears did that preseason they never played Mitch. That works. Did Mitch suck because they didn't play him in the preseason? Or were they hiding him in the preseason because he sucked? Seems like it was the latter, not the former. It a shot at the shitty Bears coaching staff in a Packers thread, it's okay just to nod. |
Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 2:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
Two potential injuries at WR and OL |
Author: | Zippy-The-Pinhead [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 2:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
veganfan21 wrote: Two potential injuries at WR and OL They were both playing regardless so it’s not really point of discussion. Beyond that Bak was laughing on the sideline so I’m not sure that’s a particular concern. MVS has a back so we’ll see how that plays out after 2 weeks but he’s the 4th WR so that’s not a killer. Edit: Bak is apparently fine. |
Author: | 312player [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 7:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
whitesoxfanfrank wrote: Nothing quite as dumb as playing the MVP in a meaningless game. Extremely stupid. I dont think it was his call. Id say Rodgers said Im playing and they agreed on only a half. |
Author: | a retard [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
veganfan21 wrote: Two potential injuries at WR and OL Details please. |
Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 9:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
Bahk was not hurt. He got his work in and got out. MVS had a back issue he has been dealing with flare up. He is the 4th wr and was playing in this game regardless. He will be fine. |
Author: | veganfan21 [ Sat Jan 22, 2022 11:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
FavreFan wrote: Half the board moronically thinks Matt LeFleur still sucks even after he's proven pretty thoroughly he's a huge upgrade over the previous guy. Care to revisit this obviously wrong take? |
Author: | This Ends in Antioch [ Sat Jan 22, 2022 11:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
veganfan21 wrote: FavreFan wrote: Half the board moronically thinks Matt LeFleur still sucks even after he's proven pretty thoroughly he's a huge upgrade over the previous guy. Care to revisit this obviously wrong take? |
Author: | HawaiiYou [ Sat Jan 22, 2022 11:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
You mean Matt LaLoser |
Author: | This Ends in Antioch [ Sat Jan 22, 2022 11:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
HawaiiYou wrote: You mean Matt LaLoser |
Author: | veganfan21 [ Sat Jan 22, 2022 11:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
How's this guy gonna gameplan his way to 10 points against a team that kept giving the ball right back to you. |
Author: | Tall Midget [ Sat Jan 22, 2022 11:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
This guy turned the carriage into a pumpkin for the second straight year. The future isn't going to get any brighter with Jordan Love as the QB next year. He's gotta go. |
Author: | HawaiiYou [ Sat Jan 22, 2022 11:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
Packers only had 10 men on the field on the last play FG try HAHAHAHAHAHA GREAT COACHING THERE! |
Author: | Tall Midget [ Sat Jan 22, 2022 11:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
HawaiiYou wrote: Packers only had 10 men on the field on the last play FG try HAHAHAHAHAHA GREAT COACHING THERE! |
Author: | conns7901 [ Sat Jan 22, 2022 11:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
Author: | Tall Midget [ Sun Jan 23, 2022 1:09 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
This dude's postgame press conference--with the deer-in-the-headlights look and the sketchy facial hair--was hilarious. |
Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Jan 23, 2022 11:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
This team had the ball longer, had one more drive, generated more yards, and still didn't score more points vs a team that didn't even score a TD on offense at all. |
Author: | billypootons [ Sun Jan 23, 2022 12:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Matt LeFleur |
Fox tv crew made it seem like he actually told them "I just hope our special teams doesn't screw up". That's a hell of a statement from a coach |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |