| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Refs https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=129036 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Nas [ Sun Nov 20, 2022 3:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Refs |
| Author: | Jaw Breaker [ Sun Nov 20, 2022 4:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
Is high stepping actually against the rules? Sad. |
|
| Author: | casual fan [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 8:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
Kind of like this one last season. No fun for You!!! https://sports.yahoo.com/officials-null ... 52551.html |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 8:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
as a person at the game, I agree as a person who had northwestern +17, it didn't bother me |
|
| Author: | BigW72 [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 9:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
Fuck Purdue, but that man...that is a lame call. Awful. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 10:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
It was the right call. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 10:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eoj8A35 ... BuckeyeGuy |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 10:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eoj8A35rIVY&ab_channel=MattBuckeyeGuy Well, it's not a penalty when a top ten team does it. |
|
| Author: | man of few opinions [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 10:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
that is an all-time horrible call right there. damn. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 10:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
Brick wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eoj8A35rIVY&ab_channel=MattBuckeyeGuy Well, it's not a penalty when a top ten team does it. I learned that again on Saturday. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 10:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
man of few opinions wrote: that is an all-time horrible call right there. damn. The college rulebook, when describing when the penalty is called, includes high stepping prior to the end zone as a reason to call it back. It's a bad rule. It should be a penalty on the kickoff or extra point. It was called absolutely correct though. Purdue has been an undisciplined team all year. It cost them the Syracuse game. |
|
| Author: | man of few opinions [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 11:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
It is a horrible rule and a horrible application of the rule. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 11:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
man of few opinions wrote: It is a horrible rule and a horrible application of the rule. It's a bad rule. It should be a 15 yard penalty on the kickoff or extra point. It was a 100% correct application of the rule. |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 12:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: Brick wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eoj8A35rIVY&ab_channel=MattBuckeyeGuy Well, it's not a penalty when a top ten team does it. I learned that again on Saturday.  My son and I were the only Michigan fans in an IL bar for Saturdays game. Had to admit out loud the bad no call on the 4th and 3 play. |
|
| Author: | man of few opinions [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 12:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
Brick wrote: man of few opinions wrote: It is a horrible rule and a horrible application of the rule. It's a bad rule. It should be a 15 yard penalty on the kickoff or extra point. It was a 100% correct application of the rule. Sometimes its fun just to throw stuff out like this to watch you relish "Brick-ing". |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 12:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
I too enjoy correcting your mistakes. |
|
| Author: | Bagels [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 1:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
Brick the bootlicker |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 1:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
Defund The Referees! |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 3:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
I know I'm going to regret admitting this but...I kind of liked purdue's entire campus and stadium. It didn't seem nearly as hick as I imagined. Now, it does display a huge inferiority complex to say "IU sucks" on every kickoff but otherwise I got a good vibe. I didn't see many bars for a big, state school. Lots of liquor stores. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 3:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
good dolphin wrote: I know I'm going to regret admitting this but...I kind of liked purdue's entire campus and stadium. It didn't seem nearly as hick as I imagined. Now, it does display a huge inferiority complex to say "IU sucks" on every kickoff but otherwise I got a good vibe. I didn't see many bars for a big, state school. Lots of liquor stores. They are working on the bars but it's terrible now and wasn't great before. |
|
| Author: | BigW72 [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 4:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
good dolphin wrote: I know I'm going to regret admitting this but...I kind of liked purdue's entire campus and stadium. It didn't seem nearly as hick as I imagined. Now, it does display a huge inferiority complex to say "IU sucks" on every kickoff but otherwise I got a good vibe. I didn't see many bars for a big, state school. Lots of liquor stores. I thought it was a great campus. I would have loved to have sent my son there, but they did not financially cooperate. |
|
| Author: | Harvard Dan [ Mon Nov 21, 2022 5:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Refs |
Brick wrote: man of few opinions wrote: It is a horrible rule and a horrible application of the rule. It's a bad rule. It should be a 15 yard penalty on the kickoff or extra point. It was a 100% correct application of the rule. Agreed...it should be applied as a dead-ball foul as it isn't a safety issue or causing unfair advantage. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|