Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Canada
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=130023
Page 1 of 6

Author:  pittmike [ Thu Jun 08, 2023 6:29 am ]
Post subject:  Canada

Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.

Author:  Brick [ Thu Jun 08, 2023 6:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Masks are back!

Author:  W_Z [ Thu Jun 08, 2023 7:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

they'll put them out with ruffles all dressed and ketchup spray.

Author:  Hussra [ Thu Jun 08, 2023 7:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

https://youtu.be/fXeWT8CQ6uc?t=12

Author:  The Hawk [ Thu Jun 08, 2023 11:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



I heard on the news yesterday that 2-3 years ago, Trudeau was told that the forest in its country needed to be thinned out and brush and undergrowth removed as part of forest management. This opinion was made by experts familiar with wild fire prevention and forest management. The moron refused and the rest is history. The same ignorance has occurred in my state, california for decades.

Its remarkable and ironic that the opponents to this common sense action are the same people now who are moaning and groaning are the liberal environmental stupes and who are blaming these fires and air pollution on the catch all "climate change". :twisted:

Author:  a retard [ Thu Jun 08, 2023 12:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Signs like this all over Waushara county remind me not to recklessly burn.

Image

Author:  a retard [ Thu Jun 08, 2023 12:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada


Author:  IkeSouth [ Thu Jun 08, 2023 12:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

too many people exist. forest fires are natural and canada sucks just as much as california so who cares if they burn.

Author:  Nas [ Thu Jun 08, 2023 12:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

a retard wrote:


:lol: :lol:

Author:  This Ends in Antioch [ Thu Jun 08, 2023 1:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Nas wrote:
a genius wrote:


:lol: :lol:

:lol:

Author:  Darkside [ Thu Jun 08, 2023 2:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Are we winning or losing the smoke wars?

Author:  denisdman [ Thu Jun 08, 2023 5:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Darkside wrote:
Are we winning or losing the smoke wars?


As long as we have Caller Knob and Hawaii blow You, we are winning the smoking pole wars.

Author:  Nardi [ Thu Jun 08, 2023 6:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Fuckers are trying to burn down the White House....AGAIN!

Author:  Crystal Lake Hoffy [ Thu Jun 15, 2023 11:57 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Well the Chicago skyline just disappeared in the smoke and haze. Stupid Canadians.

Author:  Tall Midget [ Thu Jun 15, 2023 12:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

The Hawk wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



I heard on the news yesterday that 2-3 years ago, Trudeau was told that the forest in its country needed to be thinned out and brush and undergrowth removed as part of forest management. This opinion was made by experts familiar with wild fire prevention and forest management. The moron refused and the rest is history. The same ignorance has occurred in my state, california for decades.

Its remarkable and ironic that the opponents to this common sense action are the same people now who are moaning and groaning are the liberal environmental stupes and who are blaming these fires and air pollution on the catch all "climate change". :twisted:


There is a subculture within the environmental movement that advocates returning managed woodlands to unmanaged wildlands. Their motivation is to maximize forest carbon storage capacity by ending the use of management strategies that yield structural complexity (ie creating varied openings, different kinds of canopies, multiple growth stages, etc). Aside from increasing the likelihood of wildfires, this concept is idiotic on multiple levels:

1) Forests across the U.S. are under siege from introduced and range-shifting invasive species, the latter of which are expanding their growth areas due to climate change. Management is essential to promote forest resilience.

2) Forests serve as habitat for many different forms of wildlife. Invasive species, climate change, development and fragmentation are collectively undermining the ability of forests to maintain this ecological function. Loss of biodiversity is environmentally damaging in a wide range of areas.

3) Fires obviously negate carbon storage, so the increasingly popular "return to the wild" approach is inherently contradictory.

We need to manage forests to promote resiliency in the face of climate change and invasive species. Resilent forests are structurally complex, highly diverse at the species level, and are future-adapted to projected climate changes. None of this can happen on its own.

Author:  Crystal Lake Hoffy [ Fri Jun 16, 2023 4:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Tall Midget wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



I heard on the news yesterday that 2-3 years ago, Trudeau was told that the forest in its country needed to be thinned out and brush and undergrowth removed as part of forest management. This opinion was made by experts familiar with wild fire prevention and forest management. The moron refused and the rest is history. The same ignorance has occurred in my state, california for decades.

Its remarkable and ironic that the opponents to this common sense action are the same people now who are moaning and groaning are the liberal environmental stupes and who are blaming these fires and air pollution on the catch all "climate change". :twisted:


There is a subculture within the environmental movement that advocates returning managed woodlands to unmanaged wildlands. Their motivation is to maximize forest carbon storage capacity by ending the use of management strategies that yield structural complexity (ie creating varied openings, different kinds of canopies, multiple growth stages, etc). Aside from increasing the likelihood of wildfires, this concept is idiotic on multiple levels:

1) Forests across the U.S. are under siege from introduced and range-shifting invasive species, the latter of which are expanding their growth areas due to climate change. Management is essential to promote forest resilience.

2) Forests serve as habitat for many different forms of wildlife. Invasive species, climate change, development and fragmentation are collectively undermining the ability of forests to maintain this ecological function. Loss of biodiversity is environmentally damaging in a wide range of areas.

3) Fires obviously negate carbon storage, so the increasingly popular "return to the wild" approach is inherently contradictory.

We need to manage forests to promote resiliency in the face of climate change and invasive species. Resilent forests are structurally complex, highly diverse at the species level, and are future-adapted to projected climate changes. None of this can happen on its own.


Wasn't there also some movement to profit-ize carbon storage? In other words, there could be some annual incentive to convert to unmanaged land in order to combat deforestation. I never understood where the money would come from or how they could reach a high enough incentive to outweigh the alternative.

Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Tue Jun 27, 2023 6:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Did you run out of water up there, you hosers? Getting kind of tired of this, eh.

Author:  T-Bone [ Tue Jun 27, 2023 6:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Pretty smoky here up north just over the IL border, and with the heavy wet clouds above is seems to have trapped it below for us.

Author:  Rod [ Tue Jun 27, 2023 7:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Tall Midget wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



I heard on the news yesterday that 2-3 years ago, Trudeau was told that the forest in its country needed to be thinned out and brush and undergrowth removed as part of forest management. This opinion was made by experts familiar with wild fire prevention and forest management. The moron refused and the rest is history. The same ignorance has occurred in my state, california for decades.

Its remarkable and ironic that the opponents to this common sense action are the same people now who are moaning and groaning are the liberal environmental stupes and who are blaming these fires and air pollution on the catch all "climate change". :twisted:


There is a subculture within the environmental movement that advocates returning managed woodlands to unmanaged wildlands. Their motivation is to maximize forest carbon storage capacity by ending the use of management strategies that yield structural complexity (ie creating varied openings, different kinds of canopies, multiple growth stages, etc). Aside from increasing the likelihood of wildfires, this concept is idiotic on multiple levels:

1) Forests across the U.S. are under siege from introduced and range-shifting invasive species, the latter of which are expanding their growth areas due to climate change. Management is essential to promote forest resilience.

2) Forests serve as habitat for many different forms of wildlife. Invasive species, climate change, development and fragmentation are collectively undermining the ability of forests to maintain this ecological function. Loss of biodiversity is environmentally damaging in a wide range of areas.

3) Fires obviously negate carbon storage, so the increasingly popular "return to the wild" approach is inherently contradictory.

We need to manage forests to promote resiliency in the face of climate change and invasive species. Resilent forests are structurally complex, highly diverse at the species level, and are future-adapted to projected climate changes. None of this can happen on its own.


Isn't the concept of an "invasive species" anthropocentric? At some point all species were "invasive." What we consider an "invasive species" is only based upon a paradigm that man prefers.

Author:  Tall Midget [ Tue Jun 27, 2023 9:22 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



I heard on the news yesterday that 2-3 years ago, Trudeau was told that the forest in its country needed to be thinned out and brush and undergrowth removed as part of forest management. This opinion was made by experts familiar with wild fire prevention and forest management. The moron refused and the rest is history. The same ignorance has occurred in my state, california for decades.

Its remarkable and ironic that the opponents to this common sense action are the same people now who are moaning and groaning are the liberal environmental stupes and who are blaming these fires and air pollution on the catch all "climate change". :twisted:


There is a subculture within the environmental movement that advocates returning managed woodlands to unmanaged wildlands. Their motivation is to maximize forest carbon storage capacity by ending the use of management strategies that yield structural complexity (ie creating varied openings, different kinds of canopies, multiple growth stages, etc). Aside from increasing the likelihood of wildfires, this concept is idiotic on multiple levels:

1) Forests across the U.S. are under siege from introduced and range-shifting invasive species, the latter of which are expanding their growth areas due to climate change. Management is essential to promote forest resilience.

2) Forests serve as habitat for many different forms of wildlife. Invasive species, climate change, development and fragmentation are collectively undermining the ability of forests to maintain this ecological function. Loss of biodiversity is environmentally damaging in a wide range of areas.

3) Fires obviously negate carbon storage, so the increasingly popular "return to the wild" approach is inherently contradictory.

We need to manage forests to promote resiliency in the face of climate change and invasive species. Resilent forests are structurally complex, highly diverse at the species level, and are future-adapted to projected climate changes. None of this can happen on its own.


Isn't the concept of an "invasive species" anthropocentric? At some point all species were "invasive." What we consider an "invasive species" is only based upon a paradigm that man prefers.


The concept of an invasive species is both ecosystem-centric and anthropocentric.

Author:  Rod [ Tue Jun 27, 2023 11:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Tall Midget wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



I heard on the news yesterday that 2-3 years ago, Trudeau was told that the forest in its country needed to be thinned out and brush and undergrowth removed as part of forest management. This opinion was made by experts familiar with wild fire prevention and forest management. The moron refused and the rest is history. The same ignorance has occurred in my state, california for decades.

Its remarkable and ironic that the opponents to this common sense action are the same people now who are moaning and groaning are the liberal environmental stupes and who are blaming these fires and air pollution on the catch all "climate change". :twisted:


There is a subculture within the environmental movement that advocates returning managed woodlands to unmanaged wildlands. Their motivation is to maximize forest carbon storage capacity by ending the use of management strategies that yield structural complexity (ie creating varied openings, different kinds of canopies, multiple growth stages, etc). Aside from increasing the likelihood of wildfires, this concept is idiotic on multiple levels:

1) Forests across the U.S. are under siege from introduced and range-shifting invasive species, the latter of which are expanding their growth areas due to climate change. Management is essential to promote forest resilience.

2) Forests serve as habitat for many different forms of wildlife. Invasive species, climate change, development and fragmentation are collectively undermining the ability of forests to maintain this ecological function. Loss of biodiversity is environmentally damaging in a wide range of areas.

3) Fires obviously negate carbon storage, so the increasingly popular "return to the wild" approach is inherently contradictory.

We need to manage forests to promote resiliency in the face of climate change and invasive species. Resilent forests are structurally complex, highly diverse at the species level, and are future-adapted to projected climate changes. None of this can happen on its own.


Isn't the concept of an "invasive species" anthropocentric? At some point all species were "invasive." What we consider an "invasive species" is only based upon a paradigm that man prefers.


The concept of an invasive species is both ecosystem-centric and anthropocentric.


If that's all you have to say, I'll take it as a victory. :lol:

Author:  Dignified Rube [ Tue Jun 27, 2023 12:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

This is unreal, like wrath of God stuff.

Can't even go outside today. The CSO picked a bad day for having their season ending concert in the park.

Author:  This Ends in Antioch [ Tue Jun 27, 2023 12:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

It’s pretty gross out there.

Author:  Tall Midget [ Tue Jun 27, 2023 12:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Tall Midget wrote:
The Hawk wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



I heard on the news yesterday that 2-3 years ago, Trudeau was told that the forest in its country needed to be thinned out and brush and undergrowth removed as part of forest management. This opinion was made by experts familiar with wild fire prevention and forest management. The moron refused and the rest is history. The same ignorance has occurred in my state, california for decades.

Its remarkable and ironic that the opponents to this common sense action are the same people now who are moaning and groaning are the liberal environmental stupes and who are blaming these fires and air pollution on the catch all "climate change". :twisted:


There is a subculture within the environmental movement that advocates returning managed woodlands to unmanaged wildlands. Their motivation is to maximize forest carbon storage capacity by ending the use of management strategies that yield structural complexity (ie creating varied openings, different kinds of canopies, multiple growth stages, etc). Aside from increasing the likelihood of wildfires, this concept is idiotic on multiple levels:

1) Forests across the U.S. are under siege from introduced and range-shifting invasive species, the latter of which are expanding their growth areas due to climate change. Management is essential to promote forest resilience.

2) Forests serve as habitat for many different forms of wildlife. Invasive species, climate change, development and fragmentation are collectively undermining the ability of forests to maintain this ecological function. Loss of biodiversity is environmentally damaging in a wide range of areas.

3) Fires obviously negate carbon storage, so the increasingly popular "return to the wild" approach is inherently contradictory.

We need to manage forests to promote resiliency in the face of climate change and invasive species. Resilent forests are structurally complex, highly diverse at the species level, and are future-adapted to projected climate changes. None of this can happen on its own.


Isn't the concept of an "invasive species" anthropocentric? At some point all species were "invasive." What we consider an "invasive species" is only based upon a paradigm that man prefers.


The concept of an invasive species is both ecosystem-centric and anthropocentric.


If that's all you have to say, I'll take it as a victory. :lol:


I'm not sure what you mean. Surely you above all others here appreciate the need to manage ecosystems so that we continue to reap the benefits from them that allow MANY to maintain their standard of living. Sustaining ecosystem function is central to this where forests are concerned.

Author:  Nas [ Tue Jun 27, 2023 12:58 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

This Ends in Antioch wrote:
It’s pretty gross out there.


You're in Indiana or Wisconsin?

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Tue Jun 27, 2023 1:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Nas wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
It’s pretty gross out there.


You're in Indiana or Wisconsin?

:evil:

Author:  Nas [ Tue Jun 27, 2023 1:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
It’s pretty gross out there.


You're in Indiana or Wisconsin?

:evil:


I'm only a moth.

Author:  Hawg Ass [ Tue Jun 27, 2023 1:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

Nas wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
This Ends in Antioch wrote:
It’s pretty gross out there.


You're in Indiana or Wisconsin?

:evil:


I'm only a moth.

You don't have to be jealous, just move up here.

Author:  The Hawk [ Tue Jun 27, 2023 2:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

pittmike wrote:
Out your fucking fires out up there already. Jesus, don't they have a Smokey The Bear program? There have to be moose and bear walking down main street to get out of the woods.



Mussolini wannabi Justin Trudeau is likely blaming truck drivers for causing the out of control fires that were actually caused by piss poor forestation policies that threaten his population and that of its neighbor the United States.

Author:  The Hawk [ Tue Jun 27, 2023 2:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Canada

W_Z wrote:
they'll put them out with ruffles all dressed and ketchup spray.



Maybe instead of ketchup, they'll coat Maple Syrup on the front of them?

Page 1 of 6 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/