Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic - Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh

Another glance at the thread title would indicate that my constant and seemingly unrepentant abuse of Standard Written English may be a worthy candidate here.

suckers playground wrote:

Another glance at the thread title would indicate that my constant and seemingly unrepentant abuse of Standard Written English may be a worthy candidate here.

How's that Columbia education working for you? :wink:

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:

suckers playground wrote:

Another glance at the thread title would indicate that my constant and seemingly unrepentant abuse of Standard Written English may be a worthy candidate here.

How's that Columbia education working for you? :wink:

Unfortunately, it seems, all too well. :drunken:

Be careful RTroll...Spmack is lurking around :lol:

It is suspicious that you responded after RTroll posted...hmm....

If I could just find a troll that's young, hot, and has gigantic party pillows, we could have all sorts of new trolls running around here in no time! Can anybody help me out?

spmack wrote:

It is suspicious that you responded after RTroll posted...hmm....

I figured you'd get a laugh out of that one. But, Riles/Nos really seems to have gotten under your skin lately...I wonder why???

Another glance at the thread title would indicate that my constant and seemingly unrepentant abuse of Standard Written English may be a worthy candidate here.

suckers playground wrote:

Another glance at the thread title would indicate that my constant and seemingly unrepentant abuse of Standard Written English may be a worthy candidate here.

Acknowledging you have a problem is the first step to rehabilitation. :lol:

The good news is you are not alone. Few of us are immune from this message board affliction. Maybe those of us with writing backgrounds should form our own 12-step group. :lol:

suckers playground wrote:

Another glance at the thread title would indicate that my constant and seemingly unrepentant abuse of Standard Written English may be a worthy candidate here.

Acknowledging you have a problem is the first step to rehabilitation. :lol:

The good news is you are not alone. Few of us are immune from this message board affliction. Maybe those of us with writing backgrounds should form our own 12-step group. :lol:

Author:	suckers playground [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:38 pm ]
Post subject:	Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
ark? You decide!

Author:	rogers park bryan [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:39 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh

Author:	Eaglo Jeff [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:42 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh

Author:	Darkside [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:47 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
Trolling has it's place. The truly annoying ones have, for the most part, filtered out with the exception of the Riles/Nos ones. Again, one should remember that there is a difference between trolls and characters.

Author:	suckers playground [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:50 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
Another glance at the thread title would indicate that my constant and seemingly unrepentant abuse of Standard Written English may be a worthy candidate here.

Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=26404	Page 1 of 1

Author:	The Original Kid Cairo [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:54 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
suckers playground wrote: Another glance at the thread title would indicate that my constant and seemingly unrepentant abuse of Standard Written English may be a worthy candidate here. How's that Columbia education working for you?

Author:	Colonel Angus [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 2:57 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
Hawkism will never jump the shark. THAT'S BULLCRAP!

Author:	guppy [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:20 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
suckers playground wrote: The Original Kid Cairo wrote: suckers playground wrote: Another glance at the thread title would indicate that my constant and seemingly unrepentant abuse of Standard Written English may be a worthy candidate here. How's that Columbia education working for you? Unfortunately, it seems, all too well. Higher Education Fans, I think my expertise in the realm of colleges and universities will help shed some light on the above exchange between suckers playground and The Original Kid Cairo, two frequent posters on the Chicago Sports Fans Message Board. While it is logical to assume that OKC has simply made a spelling error in writing "Columbia" and is perhaps therefore really talking about a Colombian University such as the University of Bogota or another similar institution, I don't think OKC, who is known for his anality on all matters grammatical and spelling-related, would be a likely perpetrator of such a mistake. Similarly, while it is perhaps even more likely that one would assume Cairo refers to Columba University, the top-flight Ivy League institution in New York City, we can dismiss this option almost solely by considering the pervasive intellectual torpor of suckers playground's many posts! I don't want to say sp is a little slow, but let's just say the merry-go-round on his playground can't complete a full turn without getting lost! Anyway fans, I believe the "Columbia" in question to which OKC refers is none other than "Chicago's Own" Columbia College, which employs nothing but adjunct faculty members for its teaching staff. Mystery solved! Thanks for your attention, fans!

Author:	spmack [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:25 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
Ok, it has officially jumped the shark when there is a troll of a troll ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

Author:	Regular Reader [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:31 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
Be careful RTroll...Spmack is lurking around

Author:	spmack [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:59 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
Regular Reader wrote: Be careful RTroll...Spmack is lurking around It is suspicious that you responded after RTroll posted...hmm....

Author:	Regular Reader [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 5:16 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
spmack wrote: It is suspicious that you responded after RTroll posted...hmm.... I figured you'd get a laugh out of that one. But, Riles/Nos really seems to have gotten under your skin lately...I wonder why???

Author:	Juggs [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 5:26 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
Levi Johnston wrote: If I could just find a troll that's young, hot, and has gigantic party pillows, we could have all sorts of new trolls running around here in no time! Can anybody help me out? You called baby?

Author:	Marv Albert [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 5:55 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
Columbia U. chicks are easy! And game! For just about anything! YES!

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	Porterhouse [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:18 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
Levi Johnston wrote: If I could just find a troll that's young, hot, and has gigantic party pillows, we could have all sorts of new trolls running around here in no time! Can anybody help me out? Famous movie quote = "Those aren't pillows!"

Author:	Frontman [ Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:08 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
Jump the shark/nuke the fridge. Either way, a tad annoying.

Author:	spmack [ Wed Nov 12, 2008 12:07 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
Regular Reader wrote: spmack wrote: It is suspicious that you responded after RTroll posted...hmm.... I figured you'd get a laugh out of that one. But, Riles/Nos really seems to have gotten under your skin lately...I wonder why??? I probably shouldn't worry about it but I can't understand why someone needs to have so many different log ins....The only difference is the names, because the writing style of the Nos/Riles mults is still the same.

Author:	Coast2Coast [ Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:58 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
suckers playground wrote: Another glance at the thread title would indicate that my constant and seemingly unrepentant abuse of Standard Written English may be a worthy candidate here. Acknowledging you have a problem is the first step to rehabilitation. The good news is you are not alone. Few of us are immune from this message board affliction. Maybe those of us with writing backgrounds should form our own 12-step group.

Author:	suckers playground [ Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:42 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
Coast2Coast wrote: suckers playground wrote: Another glance at the thread title would indicate that my constant and seemingly unrepentant abuse of Standard Written English may be a worthy candidate here. Acknowledging you have a problem is the first step to rehabilitation. The good news is you are not alone. Few of us are immune from this message board affliction. Maybe those of us with writing backgrounds should form our own 12-step group. Good point re: acknowledgment. A 12-step program would be nice, but unfortunately I think I'd have to follow through it before I could be of any use to anyone.

Author:	Colonel Angus [ Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:42 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Which of these has jumped further across the metaphorical sh
Coast2Coast wrote: suckers playground wrote: Another glance at the thread title would indicate that my constant and seemingly unrepentant abuse of Standard Written English may be a worthy candidate here. Acknowledging you have a problem is the first step to rehabilitation. The good news is you are not alone. Few of us are immune from this message board affliction. Maybe those of us with writing backgrounds should form our own 12-step group. We have one, it's called AA.