It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 5:27 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
You're not allowed to convict people of murder because you think it sucks that they can't find his fourth wife's body, think he's a total douche or saw a Lifetime movie about him.

Not one of you had a doubt in your mind based on hearsay evidence? I, for one, would hope 12 people wouldn't convict me of something based on stuff people say they heard....maybe.

He probably did it, btw. But the prosecution clearly didn't eliminate all doubt of his guilt.

_________________
This is my signature...


Last edited by Krazy Ivan on Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
I was gonna say...this isn't right.

Like I said, he obviously did it but hopefully this doesn't set some kind of precedent.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
I like you very much.

And I agree with you just as much.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 11:51 am
Posts: 459
pizza_Place: salernos
I still don't think he did it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
I thought this would be for asking the judge to define "unanimously".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Big Chicagoan wrote:
I thought this would be for asking the judge to define "unanimously".



That too...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
I understand and respect your thoughts but I'm as happy as hell this a-hole is going away.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I'm in this camp.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Agreed on the sentiment of the thread

Here's at least SOME evidence.



There was damning testimony not based on hearsay.

A former co-worker of Peterson's, Jeff Pachter, testified that Peterson offered him $25,000 to hire a hit man to kill Savio, though he never followed through. After Savio was found dead, Peterson told him, "That favor I asked you - I don't need it anymore."

Prosecutors had to establish the most basic fact for a murder trial: that there was actually a murder.

Pathologists testified for the defense that Savio's wounds indicated an accident. But equally well-respected pathologists for the state said it was impossible for a single fall to cause both the wound on the back of her head and bruises on the front of her body.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 1:51 pm
Posts: 6302
Location: Calumet City
pizza_Place: Johns in Cal City
Big Chicagoan wrote:
I thought this would be for asking the judge to define "unanimously".

Me too

_________________
STU-GOTZ wrote:
Well Mac told me to to tell you to go FUCK YOURSELF!!! ..So now it's been said .. .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
jimmypasta wrote:
I understand and respect your thoughts but I'm as happy as hell this a-hole is going away.



amen sir.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
jimmypasta wrote:
I understand and respect your thoughts but I'm as happy as hell this a-hole is going away.



That's just it, James. I wish they would have convicted him based on actual evidence...

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Everyone should be happy that a white man can be convicted on jury bias, not just minorities.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Everyone should be happy that a white man can be convicted on jury bias, not just minorities.

:|

That's fucking ignorant. Why should anybody be happy about that? Nobody should be convicted on jury bias.

Tell the prosecution to put together a better case.

Not surprisingly, Big Chicagoan turns it into a race thing.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Last edited by The Original Kid Cairo on Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:25 am
Posts: 10462
pizza_Place: Investigating
rogers park bryan wrote:
Agreed on the sentiment of the thread

Here's at least SOME evidence.



There was damning testimony not based on hearsay.

A former co-worker of Peterson's, Jeff Pachter, testified that Peterson offered him $25,000 to hire a hit man to kill Savio, though he never followed through. After Savio was found dead, Peterson told him, "That favor I asked you - I don't need it anymore."

Prosecutors had to establish the most basic fact for a murder trial: that there was actually a murder.

Pathologists testified for the defense that Savio's wounds indicated an accident. But equally well-respected pathologists for the state said it was impossible for a single fall to cause both the wound on the back of her head and bruises on the front of her body.

I agree with this point, but one could still state that it is hearsay as I don't believe they had it on a government run tape device.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:46 am
Posts: 26636
Location: NW SUBURBS OF CHICAGO
pizza_Place: any from anywhere
This is the evidence: Major back of the head bruising and contusions on the front of her body does not sound like an accident unless she fell into the tub from a airplane.

_________________
favrefan said:"Chris Coghlan isn't gonna pay your rent, Jimmy."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:25 am
Posts: 10462
pizza_Place: Investigating
jimmypasta wrote:
This is the evidence: Major back of the head bruising and contusions on the front of her body does not sound like an accident unless she fell into the tub from a airplane.

Jimmy, she had blond roots. It was possible.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
beni hanna wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
This is the evidence: Major back of the head bruising and contusions on the front of her body does not sound like an accident unless she fell into the tub from a airplane.

Jimmy, she had blond roots. It was possible.


:lol:

Fucking asshole...

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38696
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
Agreed on the sentiment of the thread

Here's at least SOME evidence.



There was damning testimony not based on hearsay.

A former co-worker of Peterson's, Jeff Pachter, testified that Peterson offered him $25,000 to hire a hit man to kill Savio, though he never followed through. After Savio was found dead, Peterson told him, "That favor I asked you - I don't need it anymore."

Prosecutors had to establish the most basic fact for a murder trial: that there was actually a murder.

Pathologists testified for the defense that Savio's wounds indicated an accident. But equally well-respected pathologists for the state said it was impossible for a single fall to cause both the wound on the back of her head and bruises on the front of her body.

Pete the Killer wrote:
I took care of that thing for ya'

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Everyone should be happy that a white man can be convicted on jury bias, not just minorities.

:|

That's fucking ignorant. Why should anybody be happy about that? Nobody should be convicted on jury bias.

Tell the prosecution to put together a better case.

Not surprisingly, Big Chicagoan turns it into a race thing.


Not surprisingly, OKC can't take a joke and bitches and moans about the bias' and racists of the world. Waaaaa. Waaaaa. Quit being such a baby, and lighten up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:25 am
Posts: 10462
pizza_Place: Investigating
Terry's Peeps wrote:
beni hanna wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
This is the evidence: Major back of the head bruising and contusions on the front of her body does not sound like an accident unless she fell into the tub from a airplane.

Jimmy, she had blond roots. It was possible.


:lol:

Fucking asshole...

GUILTY as charged.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Image

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:24 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Nomination seconded.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
I get KI's point, but I'm tired of high profile murderers, or other offenders, getting off because of a great attorney. If you'll pardon the expression. I hope he's in general population now. A police that kills women should last a couple seconds after Sandusky. If he was available to the crowd.

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:25 am
Posts: 10462
pizza_Place: Investigating
Hearsay has to be used in context and appropriately. This is no different than a eye witness. Some are better than others. To be fair to defendants, we should eliminate eye witnesses too if we want to be more judicious in making sure we don't incarcerate people wrongly.

I had a whole bunch of stuff written and I think I will let Aggravated Sox Fan Bob and others give us a true lesson what this hearsay thing means. As a defendant I can see this making some nervous. As a dead or potentially dead victim I can see this providing some solace.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Krazy Ivan wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
I understand and respect your thoughts but I'm as happy as hell this a-hole is going away.



That's just it, James. I wish they would have convicted him based on actual evidence...





I understand what you are saying but I would like to see the phrase "reasonable doubt" be replaced with common sense..not every crime has a high def videotape of the actual crime..this guy is as guilty as they come.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23845
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
312player wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
I understand and respect your thoughts but I'm as happy as hell this a-hole is going away.



That's just it, James. I wish they would have convicted him based on actual evidence...





I understand what you are saying but I would like to see the phrase "reasonable doubt" be replaced with common sense..not every crime has a high def videotape of the actual crime..this guy is as guilty as they come.

No way 12 jurors will have the same idea of common sense.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
Do you believe that hillbilly with the big tits in Florida killed her baby?...I don't see how anyone could NOT see that..I would be in favor of professional jurors..there are just too many stupid people in this country, and all it takes is one of 12 to not have common sense.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
312player wrote:
Do you believe that hillbilly with the big tits in Florida killed her baby?...I don't see how anyone could NOT see that..I would be in favor of professional jurors..there are just too many stupid people in this country, and all it takes is one of 12 to not have common sense.


Why do you want to take away our freedoms comrade?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Drew Petersen jurors
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43575
Terry's Peeps wrote:
312player wrote:
Do you believe that hillbilly with the big tits in Florida killed her baby?...I don't see how anyone could NOT see that..I would be in favor of professional jurors..there are just too many stupid people in this country, and all it takes is one of 12 to not have common sense.


Why do you want to take away our freedoms comrade?

I've changed my mind. I'm voting 312player poster of the year.

Sorry SHARK.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group