Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Drew Petersen jurors
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=73098
Page 1 of 3

Author:  Krazy Ivan [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Drew Petersen jurors

You're not allowed to convict people of murder because you think it sucks that they can't find his fourth wife's body, think he's a total douche or saw a Lifetime movie about him.

Not one of you had a doubt in your mind based on hearsay evidence? I, for one, would hope 12 people wouldn't convict me of something based on stuff people say they heard....maybe.

He probably did it, btw. But the prosecution clearly didn't eliminate all doubt of his guilt.

Author:  The Original Kid Cairo [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

I was gonna say...this isn't right.

Like I said, he obviously did it but hopefully this doesn't set some kind of precedent.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

I like you very much.

And I agree with you just as much.

Author:  beervendor [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

I still don't think he did it.

Author:  Big Chicagoan [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

I thought this would be for asking the judge to define "unanimously".

Author:  Krazy Ivan [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

Big Chicagoan wrote:
I thought this would be for asking the judge to define "unanimously".



That too...

Author:  jimmypasta [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

I understand and respect your thoughts but I'm as happy as hell this a-hole is going away.

Author:  FavreFan [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

I'm in this camp.

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

Agreed on the sentiment of the thread

Here's at least SOME evidence.



There was damning testimony not based on hearsay.

A former co-worker of Peterson's, Jeff Pachter, testified that Peterson offered him $25,000 to hire a hit man to kill Savio, though he never followed through. After Savio was found dead, Peterson told him, "That favor I asked you - I don't need it anymore."

Prosecutors had to establish the most basic fact for a murder trial: that there was actually a murder.

Pathologists testified for the defense that Savio's wounds indicated an accident. But equally well-respected pathologists for the state said it was impossible for a single fall to cause both the wound on the back of her head and bruises on the front of her body.

Author:  Gloopan Kuratz [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

Big Chicagoan wrote:
I thought this would be for asking the judge to define "unanimously".

Me too

Author:  312player [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

jimmypasta wrote:
I understand and respect your thoughts but I'm as happy as hell this a-hole is going away.



amen sir.

Author:  Krazy Ivan [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

jimmypasta wrote:
I understand and respect your thoughts but I'm as happy as hell this a-hole is going away.



That's just it, James. I wish they would have convicted him based on actual evidence...

Author:  Big Chicagoan [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

Everyone should be happy that a white man can be convicted on jury bias, not just minorities.

Author:  The Original Kid Cairo [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

Big Chicagoan wrote:
Everyone should be happy that a white man can be convicted on jury bias, not just minorities.

:|

That's fucking ignorant. Why should anybody be happy about that? Nobody should be convicted on jury bias.

Tell the prosecution to put together a better case.

Not surprisingly, Big Chicagoan turns it into a race thing.

Author:  beni hanna [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

rogers park bryan wrote:
Agreed on the sentiment of the thread

Here's at least SOME evidence.



There was damning testimony not based on hearsay.

A former co-worker of Peterson's, Jeff Pachter, testified that Peterson offered him $25,000 to hire a hit man to kill Savio, though he never followed through. After Savio was found dead, Peterson told him, "That favor I asked you - I don't need it anymore."

Prosecutors had to establish the most basic fact for a murder trial: that there was actually a murder.

Pathologists testified for the defense that Savio's wounds indicated an accident. But equally well-respected pathologists for the state said it was impossible for a single fall to cause both the wound on the back of her head and bruises on the front of her body.

I agree with this point, but one could still state that it is hearsay as I don't believe they had it on a government run tape device.

Author:  jimmypasta [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

This is the evidence: Major back of the head bruising and contusions on the front of her body does not sound like an accident unless she fell into the tub from a airplane.

Author:  beni hanna [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

jimmypasta wrote:
This is the evidence: Major back of the head bruising and contusions on the front of her body does not sound like an accident unless she fell into the tub from a airplane.

Jimmy, she had blond roots. It was possible.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

beni hanna wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
This is the evidence: Major back of the head bruising and contusions on the front of her body does not sound like an accident unless she fell into the tub from a airplane.

Jimmy, she had blond roots. It was possible.


:lol:

Fucking asshole...

Author:  badrogue17 [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

rogers park bryan wrote:
Agreed on the sentiment of the thread

Here's at least SOME evidence.



There was damning testimony not based on hearsay.

A former co-worker of Peterson's, Jeff Pachter, testified that Peterson offered him $25,000 to hire a hit man to kill Savio, though he never followed through. After Savio was found dead, Peterson told him, "That favor I asked you - I don't need it anymore."

Prosecutors had to establish the most basic fact for a murder trial: that there was actually a murder.

Pathologists testified for the defense that Savio's wounds indicated an accident. But equally well-respected pathologists for the state said it was impossible for a single fall to cause both the wound on the back of her head and bruises on the front of her body.

Pete the Killer wrote:
I took care of that thing for ya'

Author:  Big Chicagoan [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
Everyone should be happy that a white man can be convicted on jury bias, not just minorities.

:|

That's fucking ignorant. Why should anybody be happy about that? Nobody should be convicted on jury bias.

Tell the prosecution to put together a better case.

Not surprisingly, Big Chicagoan turns it into a race thing.


Not surprisingly, OKC can't take a joke and bitches and moans about the bias' and racists of the world. Waaaaa. Waaaaa. Quit being such a baby, and lighten up.

Author:  beni hanna [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

Terry's Peeps wrote:
beni hanna wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
This is the evidence: Major back of the head bruising and contusions on the front of her body does not sound like an accident unless she fell into the tub from a airplane.

Jimmy, she had blond roots. It was possible.


:lol:

Fucking asshole...

GUILTY as charged.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

Image

Author:  Ugueth Will Shiv You [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

Nomination seconded.

Author:  Drop In [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

I get KI's point, but I'm tired of high profile murderers, or other offenders, getting off because of a great attorney. If you'll pardon the expression. I hope he's in general population now. A police that kills women should last a couple seconds after Sandusky. If he was available to the crowd.

Author:  beni hanna [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

Hearsay has to be used in context and appropriately. This is no different than a eye witness. Some are better than others. To be fair to defendants, we should eliminate eye witnesses too if we want to be more judicious in making sure we don't incarcerate people wrongly.

I had a whole bunch of stuff written and I think I will let Aggravated Sox Fan Bob and others give us a true lesson what this hearsay thing means. As a defendant I can see this making some nervous. As a dead or potentially dead victim I can see this providing some solace.

Author:  312player [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

Krazy Ivan wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
I understand and respect your thoughts but I'm as happy as hell this a-hole is going away.



That's just it, James. I wish they would have convicted him based on actual evidence...





I understand what you are saying but I would like to see the phrase "reasonable doubt" be replaced with common sense..not every crime has a high def videotape of the actual crime..this guy is as guilty as they come.

Author:  KDdidit [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

312player wrote:
Krazy Ivan wrote:
jimmypasta wrote:
I understand and respect your thoughts but I'm as happy as hell this a-hole is going away.



That's just it, James. I wish they would have convicted him based on actual evidence...





I understand what you are saying but I would like to see the phrase "reasonable doubt" be replaced with common sense..not every crime has a high def videotape of the actual crime..this guy is as guilty as they come.

No way 12 jurors will have the same idea of common sense.

Author:  312player [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

Do you believe that hillbilly with the big tits in Florida killed her baby?...I don't see how anyone could NOT see that..I would be in favor of professional jurors..there are just too many stupid people in this country, and all it takes is one of 12 to not have common sense.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

312player wrote:
Do you believe that hillbilly with the big tits in Florida killed her baby?...I don't see how anyone could NOT see that..I would be in favor of professional jurors..there are just too many stupid people in this country, and all it takes is one of 12 to not have common sense.


Why do you want to take away our freedoms comrade?

Author:  Douchebag [ Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Drew Petersen jurors

Terry's Peeps wrote:
312player wrote:
Do you believe that hillbilly with the big tits in Florida killed her baby?...I don't see how anyone could NOT see that..I would be in favor of professional jurors..there are just too many stupid people in this country, and all it takes is one of 12 to not have common sense.


Why do you want to take away our freedoms comrade?

I've changed my mind. I'm voting 312player poster of the year.

Sorry SHARK.

Page 1 of 3 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/